Frostie Posted February 13, 2016 Posted February 13, 2016 (edited) Well one RVV at least :D Edited February 13, 2016 by Frostie "[51☭] FROSTIE" #55 'Red 5'. Lord Flashheart 51st PVO "Bisons" - 100 KIAP Regiment Fastest MiG pilot in the world - TCR'10 https://100kiap.org
Boberro Posted February 13, 2016 Posted February 13, 2016 Sarcasm on 20 years ago they didn't have even one :D Now 1 pylon. That's outstanding progress :) Sarcasm off Russians want to test what they've developed. I've heard more Pancir SAM systems came to Syria too. It is interesting what more would they send there. Reminder: Fighter pilots make movies. Bomber pilots make... HISTORY! :D | Also to be remembered: FRENCH TANKS HAVE ONE GEAR FORWARD AND FIVE BACKWARD :D ಠ_ಠ ツ
GGTharos Posted February 13, 2016 Posted February 13, 2016 It may be rvv-sd LRIP, who knows. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Reminder: SAM = Speed Bump :D I used to play flight sims like you, but then I took a slammer to the knee - Yoda
mvsgas Posted February 14, 2016 Posted February 14, 2016 Well, I'm glad for all those guys that for over ten years on this forums have talk about that missile. You get to finally see one loaded on a aircraft in a combat situation. To whom it may concern, I am an idiot, unfortunately for the world, I have a internet connection and a fondness for beer....apologies for that. Thank you for you patience. Many people don't want the truth, they want constant reassurance that whatever misconception/fallacies they believe in are true..
Drona Posted February 14, 2016 Posted February 14, 2016 I really doubt there's only one of those missiles brought to Syria. There's probably lots more in a IIluyshin 76 that would've come earlier.
Dudikoff Posted February 14, 2016 Posted February 14, 2016 It may be rvv-sd LRIP, who knows. It has to be, although IIRC that's the export designation; the Russian one is R77-1. i386DX40@42 MHz w/i387 CP, 4 MB RAM (8*512 kB), Trident 8900C 1 MB w/16-bit RAMDAC ISA, Quantum 340 MB UDMA33, SB 16, DOS 6.22 w/QEMM + Win3.11CE, Quickshot 1btn 2axis, Numpad as hat. 2 FPH on a good day, 1 FPH avg. DISCLAIMER: My posts are still absolutely useless. Just finding excuses not to learn the F-14 (HB's Swansong?). Annoyed by my posts? Please consider donating. Once the target sum is reached, I'll be off to somewhere nice I promise not to post from. I'd buy that for a dollar!
AlexHunter Posted February 14, 2016 Posted February 14, 2016 (edited) This "product" 170-1 otherwise: RVV-SD - modification, presented in 2009 increased to 110 km launch range, the test is complete in 2013 Edited February 14, 2016 by AlexHunter Открылась бездна звезд полна; Звездам числа нет, бездне дна. (М. В. Ломоносов)
NOLA Posted February 14, 2016 Posted February 14, 2016 Logically it is R-77-1 as R-77 (RVV-AE as known in export designation) was never in service in RuAF. However visually it looks like R-77 and not R-77-1. But that might be due to lack of any good pictures i am left with that impression.
ФрогФут Posted February 14, 2016 Posted February 14, 2016 Logically it is R-77-1 as R-77 (RVV-AE as known in export designation) was never in service in RuAF. However visually it looks like R-77 and not R-77-1. But that might be due to lack of any good pictures i am left with that impression. Why do you think it does not look like 77-1? "Я ошеломлён, но думаю об этом другими словами", - некий гражданин Ноет котик, ноет кротик, Ноет в небе самолетик, Ноют клумбы и кусты - Ноют все. Поной и ты.
*Rage* Posted February 14, 2016 Posted February 14, 2016 Can we have it in DCS? :) [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] 64th "Scorpions" Aggressor Squadron Discord: 64th Aggressor Squadron TS: 195.201.110.22
karambiatos Posted February 14, 2016 Posted February 14, 2016 Can we have it in DCS? :) in 300 years when we get the su-35 A 1000 flights, a 1000 crashes, perfect record. =&arrFilter_pf[gameversion]=&arrFilter_pf[filelang]=&arrFilter_pf[aircraft]=&arrFilter_DATE_CREATE_1_DAYS_TO_BACK=&sort_by_order=TIMESTAMP_X_DESC"] Check out my random mods and things
GGTharos Posted February 14, 2016 Posted February 14, 2016 I imagine it could 'easily' be upgraded with a bigger rocket motor by miniaturizing electronics like AIM-120C5, so there would be no need to change the body. Why do you think it does not look like 77-1? [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Reminder: SAM = Speed Bump :D I used to play flight sims like you, but then I took a slammer to the knee - Yoda
Seaeagle Posted February 14, 2016 Posted February 14, 2016 I imagine it could 'easily' be upgraded with a bigger rocket motor by miniaturizing electronics like AIM-120C5, so there would be no need to change the body. The RVV-SD is some 10 cm longer than the RVV-AE and weighs about 15 kg more. The electronics, assuming that it involves the new 9B-1103M seeker in place of the old 9B-1348E, is some 6 kg lighter(10 kg. versus 16 kg. respectively).
GGTharos Posted February 14, 2016 Posted February 14, 2016 Is there any reliable information regarding the RVV-SD? [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Reminder: SAM = Speed Bump :D I used to play flight sims like you, but then I took a slammer to the knee - Yoda
NOLA Posted February 14, 2016 Posted February 14, 2016 Why do you think it does not look like 77-1? Even though the length increase is only 11cm, visually it should look longer even from a distance. The ones in Syria just look R-77 like, ie with short motor part.
Seaeagle Posted February 14, 2016 Posted February 14, 2016 Is there any reliable information regarding the RVV-SD? Some - at least the basic specs as published by the manufacturer(Tactical Missiles Corporation JSC) at: http://eng.ktrv.ru/production_eng/323/503/567/ Length: 3,7 m versus 3,6 m(RVV-AE) Weight: 190 kg versus 175 kg(RVV-AE) Body diameter is the same(200 mm), while the dimensions for wing- and rudder span varies by a couple of mm - don't know if this signifies any change or if they are just rough numbers. In regards to the sekerhead there is information available(from AGAT) for the new 9B-1103M.
Recommended Posts