Jump to content

Mirage supercruising?


Veritech

Recommended Posts

M2K can "supercruise" due to the delta wing arround 40k high. The only problem is that it initially needs AB to go supersonic. Then can supercruise MAX dry low supersonic. Something arround 1.2M if I am right :-).


Edited by Panthir

My Hardware: ROG Strix X570-F Gaming - AMD 5600X @ 4.7 ghz - G.SKILL TRIDENT 32GB DDR4 3200 (14-14-14-34 CL) - GigaByte 3080ti OC 12gb - Corsair MP600 Force 1TB - 2 x EVO Nvme 500GB - Virpil Warbird Base T-50CM2 and TM Throttle + Trackhat + G25 + AOC AG271QG 27"

My Modules: JF-17, F-16C, AV-8N/A, F-18C, ASJ37, MiG-15Bis, MiG-21Bis, Fw-190D, Bf-109K, P-51D, F-86F, Ka-50 III, UH-1H, Mi-8MTV2, NS430, FC3, A-10C, Mirage 2000C, L-39, F-5E-3, SA342, Spitfire, AH-64, Mirage F-1CE.

My Maps: Nevada, Normandy, Persian Gulf, Syria, South Atlantic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No. Just no. You`d need a much more powerful dry-thrust engine for this :) Drag is still very high at M1.2.

 

M2K can "supercruise" due to the delta wing arround 40k high. The only problem is that it initially needs AB to go supersonic. Then can supercruise MAX dry low supersonic. Something arround 1.2M if I am right :-).

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Reminder: SAM = Speed Bump :D

I used to play flight sims like you, but then I took a slammer to the knee - Yoda

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My Hardware: ROG Strix X570-F Gaming - AMD 5600X @ 4.7 ghz - G.SKILL TRIDENT 32GB DDR4 3200 (14-14-14-34 CL) - GigaByte 3080ti OC 12gb - Corsair MP600 Force 1TB - 2 x EVO Nvme 500GB - Virpil Warbird Base T-50CM2 and TM Throttle + Trackhat + G25 + AOC AG271QG 27"

My Modules: JF-17, F-16C, AV-8N/A, F-18C, ASJ37, MiG-15Bis, MiG-21Bis, Fw-190D, Bf-109K, P-51D, F-86F, Ka-50 III, UH-1H, Mi-8MTV2, NS430, FC3, A-10C, Mirage 2000C, L-39, F-5E-3, SA342, Spitfire, AH-64, Mirage F-1CE.

My Maps: Nevada, Normandy, Persian Gulf, Syria, South Atlantic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The primary advantage of the delta wing is that, with a large enough angle of rearward sweep, the wing’s leading edge will not contact the shock wave boundary formed at the nose of the fuselage as the speed of the aircraft approaches and exceeds transonic to supersonic speed. The rearward sweep angle vastly lowers the airspeed normal to the leading edge of the wing, thereby allowing the aircraft to fly at high subsonic, transonic, or supersonic speed, while the over wing speed of the lifting air is kept to less than the speed of sound. Some other advantages of Delta wings are:-

 

Rise in Transsonic drag is gradual and peak drag in supersonic flight is reduced

My Hardware: ROG Strix X570-F Gaming - AMD 5600X @ 4.7 ghz - G.SKILL TRIDENT 32GB DDR4 3200 (14-14-14-34 CL) - GigaByte 3080ti OC 12gb - Corsair MP600 Force 1TB - 2 x EVO Nvme 500GB - Virpil Warbird Base T-50CM2 and TM Throttle + Trackhat + G25 + AOC AG271QG 27"

My Modules: JF-17, F-16C, AV-8N/A, F-18C, ASJ37, MiG-15Bis, MiG-21Bis, Fw-190D, Bf-109K, P-51D, F-86F, Ka-50 III, UH-1H, Mi-8MTV2, NS430, FC3, A-10C, Mirage 2000C, L-39, F-5E-3, SA342, Spitfire, AH-64, Mirage F-1CE.

My Maps: Nevada, Normandy, Persian Gulf, Syria, South Atlantic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Somehow that doesn`t look like a performance chart for the Mirage. This might help your argument a bit better. :)

 

Even a drag force or drag coefficient graph would help your argument much better. What you types is really no different between the mirage and the vast majority of other fighters. Delta wings don`t magically make an aircraft super-slick and able to super-cruise.

 

I might add that you`ll one day notice - if you look deep enough - that descriptions of what the peak is doing aren't terribly relevant without other information, nor indeed the complete graph of the coefficient of drag at minimum.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Reminder: SAM = Speed Bump :D

I used to play flight sims like you, but then I took a slammer to the knee - Yoda

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My dear friend, I can't provide you with a performance chart right now and I don't intend to do it :-) .Eventually, Delta wings have some pros and cons as well. One advantage is the comparative drag reduction while being supersonic due to the fact that eventually the wing is still subsonic. This advantage is significant 40k high. This is the truth my friend, whatever you say. I quit now :-)

My Hardware: ROG Strix X570-F Gaming - AMD 5600X @ 4.7 ghz - G.SKILL TRIDENT 32GB DDR4 3200 (14-14-14-34 CL) - GigaByte 3080ti OC 12gb - Corsair MP600 Force 1TB - 2 x EVO Nvme 500GB - Virpil Warbird Base T-50CM2 and TM Throttle + Trackhat + G25 + AOC AG271QG 27"

My Modules: JF-17, F-16C, AV-8N/A, F-18C, ASJ37, MiG-15Bis, MiG-21Bis, Fw-190D, Bf-109K, P-51D, F-86F, Ka-50 III, UH-1H, Mi-8MTV2, NS430, FC3, A-10C, Mirage 2000C, L-39, F-5E-3, SA342, Spitfire, AH-64, Mirage F-1CE.

My Maps: Nevada, Normandy, Persian Gulf, Syria, South Atlantic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Again, this is absolutely meaningless.

 

It's like saying that an 11m barrier is lower than a 12m barrier. It's comparatively lower, yes. You still won't be jumping over it :)

 

One advantage is the comparative drag reduction while being supersonic due to the fact that eventually the wing is still subsonic. This advantage is significant 40k high. This is the truth my friend, whatever you say. I quit now :-)

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Reminder: SAM = Speed Bump :D

I used to play flight sims like you, but then I took a slammer to the knee - Yoda

Link to comment
Share on other sites

M2K can "supercruise" due to the delta wing arround 40k high. The only problem is that it initially needs AB to go supersonic. Then can supercruise MAX dry low supersonic. Something arround 1.2M if I am right :-).

 

Chiming in, heard ~the same indeed.

40-45K.

No more than 2 Fox2.

M1.2, perhaps a bit less? Was not specific.


Edited by Azrayen

spacer.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 7 years later...

This is an old thread, but I looked it up because I was surprised to be exceeding Mach 1.02 in level flight at angels 22 without AB. I had two heaters on the outside pylons and an empty pylon in the middle after bombing a runway with BAPs (or whatever they're called). I don't know how realistic this is, or if the indicator in the HUD is correct, but using F3 (external flyby) I was definitely witnessing  the DCS sonic boom. Whether it's accurate or not, the DCS M-2000 will kind of supercruise with the lightest AA combat load.

Now, as I write this I a few things have occurred to me. At Angels 22, it wasn't getting past 1.1 so maybe I was using a ton of fuel, probably less than when using AB but still. It may not be the most efficient way to get around. When I find the time I might see what it's like above Angels 30, maybe it's further away from transonic and thus more efficient. Any other comments, criticism or knowledge is welcome on my part.

 

EDIT - IIRC, I did use AB to get past Mach 1, but it was definitely holding steady without AB at those low supersonic speeds once it was over the worst of the hump.


Edited by Bashibazouk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It might be worth testing this after dropping the bombs and also having never had the bombs on the plane but otherwise a similar loadout. A few DCS modules have had weapons drag bugs where using a weapon results in less overall drag then never having carried the weapon in the first place.

  • Like 2

Ryzen 5800x@5Ghz | 96gb DDR4 3200Mhz | Asus Rx6800xt TUF OC | 500Gb OS SSD + 1TB Gaming SSD | Asus VG27AQ | Trackhat clip | VPC WarBRD base | Thrustmaster stick and throttle (Deltasim minijoystick mod).

 

F14 | F16 | AJS37 | F5 | Av8b | FC3 | Mig21 | FW190D9 | Huey

 

Been playing DCS from Flanker 2.0 to present 😄

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

The above mentioned refer to a facebook post which is sourced off Wikipedia. People have a funny concept of what constituates a good source. Can't wait till Tiktok becomes the next best around here.

 

In any case, the ability to supercruise is really dependant on two factors: thrust-to-weight ratio and aircraft layout (aerodynamic properties). It isn't however as simple as stating that an aircraft posessing both will be capable of supercruising. It's more individual than that. Fact is, unless a proper CFD simulation, reliable chart is presented or actual pilot (possibly someone knowing one), it's pure speculation.

 

Checked "Manuel Pilote Mirage 2000 C" (don't ask me how I got it, or to post it) and there is no mention of the capability. That doesn't, however, mean anything. An SME could provide valuable input here (to which Razbam should have access) or a confirmation from Razbam. Eventually, there are French forums, where a user might have a friend of a friend in the French Air Force. Until then, speculation.


Edited by zerO_crash

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...