Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
EW radars may be too low of a frequency to target with the HARM...

But shouldn't they appear on the HUD nonetheless?

Intel i7-12700K @ 8x5GHz+4x3.8GHz + 32 GB DDR5 RAM + Nvidia Geforce RTX 2080 (8 GB VRAM) + M.2 SSD + Windows 10 64Bit

DCS Panavia Tornado (IDS) really needs to be a thing!

Tornado3 small.jpg

Posted
Why would the pilot want "S" radars (EW / Search radars) cluttering up his HUD?

 

And no, I've never seen HUD footage with "S" emitter strobes

Alright then

Intel i7-12700K @ 8x5GHz+4x3.8GHz + 32 GB DDR5 RAM + Nvidia Geforce RTX 2080 (8 GB VRAM) + M.2 SSD + Windows 10 64Bit

DCS Panavia Tornado (IDS) really needs to be a thing!

Tornado3 small.jpg

Posted
Why would the pilot want "S" radars (EW / Search radars) cluttering up his HUD?

 

And no, I've never seen HUD footage with "S" emitter strobes

But the stick is still present. Isn't that the worst of all worlds, with the stick still taking up space but no indication of what type of emitter it is, and no way to designate it as a target?

Posted
EW radars may be too low of a frequency to target with the HARM...

 

I seem to remember in the 91 Gulf War that area / sector air defence radars where engaged and destroyed by anti-radiation missiles so they should be targetable.

Posted
I seem to remember in the 91 Gulf War that area / sector air defence radars where engaged and destroyed by anti-radiation missiles so they should be targetable.

 

 

Yeah but those were probably hit with predefined data

g8PjVMw.png

Posted (edited)

wiki mentions that the AGM-88C version got an additional bandwidth of 500-2000 MHz.. Which tells me the original couldn't see that low.

 

This paper describes the transparency of the HARM radome between 8000-12000 MHz. Though that doesn't mean that's the total range of reception.

 

http://1.16

 

It also mentions the seeker to be capable of multi-octave reception (extremely wide RF range).

 

We also know the HARM is able to detect and home in on the SA-2 which operates in the E band (2000-3000 MHz) or G band (4000-6000 MHz) depending on the version of the SA-2.

https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/fan-song.htm

 

Thus, as far as we know, the HARM originally operated between 2000-12000 MHz, and the C version was upgraded to see 500 - 12000 MHz. Its possible it could see higher than 12 GHz, but I haven't yet found the evidence.

 

 

Never the less, a radar operating below 500 MHz shouldn't be seen or target-able by the AGM-88C. For instance, the HARM should not be capable against 'Spoon Rest', as it operates in the VHF band. https://fas.org/nuke/guide/russia/airdef/v-75.htm

 

Military Bands: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E_band_(NATO)

Edited by NineLine
Posted
Why would the pilot want "S" radars (EW / Search radars) cluttering up his HUD?

 

And no, I've never seen HUD footage with "S" emitter strobes

 

 

When I would run Wild Weasel missions in Falcon it was useful because you could use the HTS to get their location to easily set up a maverick or a bomb to take them out. Just had to get closer of course.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...