Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
I am a little confused, according to this https://www.navy.mil/navydata/fact_display.asp?cid=2200&tid=700&ct=2 there were 3 C variants: C, C+ and ECCM. The original deployed in 1985 required cooling. The later models did not (or is C+ just another designation for ECCM?). Perhaps all Cs were upgraded to C+ standards eventually?

Anyway, it depends on what HB is modelling.

 

Yeah, not sure. The NATOPS I referenced is from 2001. I agree, none of this is going to matter in the sim.

Former USN Avionics Tech

VF-41 86-90, 93-95

VF-101 90-93

 

Heatblur Tomcat SME

 

I9-9900K | Gigabyte Z390 Aorus Ultra | 32GB DDR4 3200 | Samsung 970 EVO Plus NVMe | RTX 2070 Super | TM Throttle | VPC Warbird Base TM F-18 Stick

Posted
Did the D not have the plumbing for early AIM-54? Or could it carry A-C+?

 

I believe the D had liquid coolant for the radar, but not for Phoenix. So it would have been limited to the C.

Former USN Avionics Tech

VF-41 86-90, 93-95

VF-101 90-93

 

Heatblur Tomcat SME

 

I9-9900K | Gigabyte Z390 Aorus Ultra | 32GB DDR4 3200 | Samsung 970 EVO Plus NVMe | RTX 2070 Super | TM Throttle | VPC Warbird Base TM F-18 Stick

Posted
D model Bombcats carried 1 Phoenix on the left wing, well at least the Blacklions did.

 

Yeah I have no doubt things changed when A/G became more prevalent, and especially when the need for coolanol went away. Maintaining that system out to the wing pylons was a nightmare.

Former USN Avionics Tech

VF-41 86-90, 93-95

VF-101 90-93

 

Heatblur Tomcat SME

 

I9-9900K | Gigabyte Z390 Aorus Ultra | 32GB DDR4 3200 | Samsung 970 EVO Plus NVMe | RTX 2070 Super | TM Throttle | VPC Warbird Base TM F-18 Stick

Posted

Was it for actual self-escort or just used as ballast to offset the weight of the TGP on the other side, like the supposed GBU-12 that was kept on Harriers back when they were limited to using the TGP on a wing pylon?

Posted (edited)
Was it for actual self-escort or just used as ballast to offset the weight of the TGP on the other side, like the supposed GBU-12 that was kept on Harriers back when they were limited to using the TGP on a wing pylon?

 

It always seemed logical to me it was to offset the TGP weight.

 

The LTS pod is not quite as heavy as the Phoenix (550 lbs according to HOTM page, I guess without the adapter?), but there's also the adapter weight, plus the pod is hanged lower than the Phoenix so I guess it might not be that far off.

Edited by Dudikoff

i386DX40@42 MHz w/i387 CP, 4 MB RAM (8*512 kB), Trident 8900C 1 MB w/16-bit RAMDAC ISA, Quantum 340 MB UDMA33, SB 16, DOS 6.22 w/QEMM + Win3.11CE, Quickshot 1btn 2axis, Numpad as hat. 2 FPH on a good day, 1 FPH avg.

 

DISCLAIMER: My posts are still absolutely useless. Just finding excuses not to learn the F-14 (HB's Swansong?).

 

Annoyed by my posts? Please consider donating. Once the target sum is reached, I'll be off to somewhere nice I promise not to post from. I'd buy that for a dollar!

Posted

Yeah to offset the weight is probably the most logical explanation. The only time I have seen more than 1 Phoenix carried on the wings is in the Domesday load out config.

Posted
If I remember correctly, one 18-gallon pump/reservoir (in the station 6 Phoenix fairing) supplies coolant to all Phoenix. There are no dependencies on which stations need to be loaded, I.e. you can have Phoenix on the wing pylons only, if you choose.

 

I was quoting the manual from DCS F-14, because i was guessing exactly the OP question.

 

http://www.heatblur.se/F-14Manual/weapons.html states:

The F-14 is capable of carrying up to 6 AIM-54 missiles, four on rails on the fuselage and one each on the glove pylons. Because of the missile cooling system used the two front phoenix pylons must always be mounted meaning that the rear fuselage pylons can’t be used if the front ones aren’t present. The glove pylons contain their own cooling systems.

 

Of course i don't know how reliable is that information...

 

In DCS, with the first release version, i tested up a bit, IIRC 2 AIM-54 on wing stations and 4 AIM-7 on semi-recessed belly stations were less draggy than 2 AIM-54 on belly pilons, and 3 AIM-7 (one on semi-recessed belly station and 2 on wing stations). AIM-54 belly pylons seemed to pay a penality, the combination of the missile+pylon drag seemed to be not properly accounted. I might retry whith the current update (or the next one).

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...