Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Building on flare testing of the A-10C and AV-8B, I've conducted a study of the flare effectiveness of the F/A-18C.

 

TL;DR: FLAR: 8 RPT: 1 INT: N/A provides the best protection, of the tested profiles, with the minimum required flares.

 

For this study, I did a bit more testing to determine the effects of the three variables that can be programmed in the F/A-18C: Flares per cycle, cycle repeats, and cycle intervals. There were some interesting results, but overall they are consistent with the previous testing.

 

You can find the results of the F/A-18C study here:

F/A-18C Flare Effectiveness Study

 

You can find the results of the A-10C study here:

A-10C Flare Effectiveness Study

 

You can find the results of the AV-8B study here:

AV-8B Flare Effectiveness Study

 

 

[16AGR]Rocketman

Edited by RocketmanAL
  • Like 1
Posted

Thank you!

PC: Windows 10 Pro X64, AMD FX8120 8 Core @ ~4.0GHz, 32GB DDR3-1600, GTX 1080 8Gb, 1 TB EVO 860 SSD | Displays: 3 Dell HD 1920x1080 @ 5520x1080 windowed ||| Hardware : TM Warthog HOTAS Stick+Throttle | 3x TM Cougar MFD's | WW Combat Panel | WW Landing Panel ||| Mods: F/A-18C | F-16 | P51-D | UH-1H | C130-J | NTTR | Persian Gulf | Syria | Channel | Normandy | WWII Assets | Super Carrier | Combined Arms

 

  • 4 years later...
Posted

Thank you very much for your quantitative study! The data are really useful.
The results and test method from V2.0 and from "DCS 2.7.1 New Flare Type Analysis, How effective are they?" are somehow different. I am confused but will try to combine both of tests.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...