SD-10 chaff resistance

[Max1mus]

Hello, some patches ago the CCM of the SD-10 was changed from 1.5 to 0.08. This was done for it to be in line with the new 120s.

 

However, the new 120s got a new way of calculating chaff resistance, this seems to not be the case with the SD-10. It makes a large turn when notched (instead of using autopilot or just going straight), which by my understanding means that its still using the old formula (R-77 does the same thing, while AIM-54 and AIM-120 do not).

 

SD_10_oldmodelling.trk

 

Am i wrong and has it been changed to use the new formula? The old 120C was at 0.1 and the 120B was at 0.2, so according to the old calculation the SD-10 should have a coefficient of at least 0.1.

[[PTF]Ali]

Hello, some patches ago the CCM of the SD-10 was changed from 1.5 to 0.08. This was done for it to be in line with the new 120s.

 

However, the new 120s got a new way of calculating chaff resistance, this seems to not be the case with the SD-10. It makes a large turn when notched (instead of using autopilot or just going straight), which by my understanding means that its still using the old formula (R-77 does the same thing, while AIM-54 and AIM-120 do not).

 

[ATTACH]245851[/ATTACH]

 

Am i wrong and has it been changed to use the new formula? The old 120C was at 0.1 and the 120B was at 0.2, so according to the old calculation the SD-10 should have a coefficient of at least 0.1.

 

can you please report it here at weapon issues: https://forums.eagle.ru/forumdisplay.php?f=658

, indeed there is bug with sd-10 chaff resistance, acting more than stupid

[Chiron]

Hello, some patches ago the CCM of the SD-10 was changed from 1.5 to 0.08. This was done for it to be in line with the new 120s.

 

However, the new 120s got a new way of calculating chaff resistance, this seems to not be the case with the SD-10. It makes a large turn when notched (instead of using autopilot or just going straight), which by my understanding means that its still using the old formula (R-77 does the same thing, while AIM-54 and AIM-120 do not).

 

[ATTACH]245851[/ATTACH]

 

Am i wrong and has it been changed to use the new formula? The old 120C was at 0.1 and the 120B was at 0.2, so according to the old calculation the SD-10 should have a coefficient of at least 0.1.

 

what a surprise ( r u the one who complained before about how SD-10 is so OP and still beat aim-120c after the new API patch now u are complaining about how SD-10 Poor now ? u attacked us for months ) now u get it ? hilarious isn't it ?

Edited August 26, 2020 by Chiron

[AeriaGloria]

what a surprise ( r u the one who complained before about how SD-10 is so OP and still beat aim-120c after the new API patch now u are complaining about how SD-10 Poor now ? ) now u get it ? hilarious isn't it ?

 

You don’t have to accuse everyone, they made the effort and made a good report

[Chiron]

You don’t have to accuse everyone, they made the effort and made a good report

 

i just surprised cuz he did more effort to attack us everyday if u remember for months

[dundun92]

FWIW he never attacked the CCM, it was the uber low drag, which has been fixed.

[J20Stronk]

Even with ccm_k0 set to 0, the missile still refuses to guide properly...

SD-10 notch with Chaff invulnerability.zip