Maverick Fixes

[Jetguy06]

Please, for the love of Hawg, can ED fix the incorrect pointing cross behavior for the upcoming A-10C 2.0? The cross should flash for an invalid track and be steady for a valid one. It's the opposite right now, and has been for as long as I've been flying the Hawg (2013). Ive brought it up in the A-10C thread a while back, but it never got acknowledged by anyone at ED.

 

 

Also, please, please implement correct modeling of the Maverick keyhole constraints, as well as the pitch angle/rate and roll angle/rate restrictions. The -65 is NOT an AIM-9X, but it currently flies off the jet at or near gimbal limits as if it were one, and still manages to hit its target. Admittedly, it's been a while since I've used IR Mavs in the Hornet or Harrier, but IIRC, keyhole was correctly modeled in both.

 

 

I understand if these items won't be fixed before A-10C 2.0. I mean, why put these features into the original just to do the work again relatively soon for 2.0? But please, once 2.0 is released, put these items somewhere in the features/bug fix list.

 

 

Thanks!!

[QuiGon]

I thought the keyhole constraints were implemented to the A-10Cs Mavericks in an update 2 or 3 years ago? :huh:

Edited September 3, 2020 by QuiGon

[Habu23]

The AGM-65 as it exists in DCS: A-10C v1 does indeed need some work: steady vs. pointing cross, HOTAS switchology to employ, and lock on range.

 

 

 

Habu

[falconbr]

Please, for the love of Hawg, can ED fix the incorrect pointing cross behavior for the upcoming A-10C 2.0? The cross should flash for an invalid track and be steady for a valid one. It's the opposite right now, and has been for as long as I've been flying the Hawg (2013). Ive brought it up in the A-10C thread a while back, but it never got acknowledged by anyone at ED.

 

 

Also, please, please implement correct modeling of the Maverick keyhole constraints, as well as the pitch angle/rate and roll angle/rate restrictions. The -65 is NOT an AIM-9X, but it currently flies off the jet at or near gimbal limits as if it were one, and still manages to hit its target. Admittedly, it's been a while since I've used IR Mavs in the Hornet or Harrier, but IIRC, keyhole was correctly modeled in both.

 

 

I understand if these items won't be fixed before A-10C 2.0. I mean, why put these features into the original just to do the work again relatively soon for 2.0? But please, once 2.0 is released, put these items somewhere in the features/bug fix list.

 

 

Thanks!!

 

+1

 

Well written!!!

 

I have made same wishes:

 

https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=3885604&postcount=9

 

Best regards,

Edited September 3, 2020 by falconbr

[falconbr]

The AGM-65 as it exists in DCS: A-10C v1 does indeed need some work: steady vs. pointing cross, HOTAS switchology to employ, and lock on range.

 

 

 

Habu

 

Dear Sir,

 

What about keyhole constraints?

 

Do you think that is correct implemented in DCS A-10C v1?

 

I think that Jetguy06 is right in a.m post.

 

Thank you in advance.

 

Best regards,

[Jetguy06]

I just want to bump this, hoping for a response from BN/NL :thumbup: