Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

For FLIR, a MV TGT option needs to appear while tracking and that needs to be boxed for AUTO to calculate lead. But it's not modeled.

 

For GMTT, I need to look into it, not sure off the top of my head.

  • 2 months later...
Posted

TACMAN for Harrier apg65 confirms this is a feature for that jet. So far the two implementations have been identical. Don't know if that helps, as the MC's are different.  That pod feature would be really nice....

  • Like 3
Posted
TACMAN for Harrier apg65 confirms this is a feature for that jet. So far the two implementations have been identical. Don't know if that helps, as the MC's are different.  That pod feature would be really nice....
Well that's a Harrier with a different radar. The Hornets did have the APG-65, but what have is the APG-73. Also our Harrier of course doesn't have a radar and uses the DMT for ABRS I believe.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Hulkbust44 said:

Well that's a Harrier with a different radar. The Hornets did have the APG-65, but what have is the APG-73. Also our Harrier of course doesn't have a radar and uses the DMT for ABRS I believe.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
 

I don't know what "our" harrier has to do with the point I made.

 

Again, not an expert here, just pointing out the two systems have been 100% identical so far. 

Edited by LastRifleRound
Posted
On 4/8/2021 at 1:09 PM, Hulkbust44 said:

Well that's a Harrier with a different radar. The Hornets did have the APG-65, but what have is the APG-73.

The APG-73 is an upgraded -65 though, so it's not crazy to expect our Hornet to have the same features.

  • Like 1
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...