Gunfreak Posted April 15, 2022 Posted April 15, 2022 The R-3R? 1 i7 13700k @5.2ghz, GTX 3090, 64Gig ram 4800mhz DDR5, M2 drive.
TLTeo Posted April 15, 2022 Posted April 15, 2022 (edited) Some combination of R-3S or R-13 would be my guess. The -R is not an IR missile, the R-13M1 was introduced in 1976 from what I can tell. Edited April 15, 2022 by TLTeo
Hiromachi Posted April 16, 2022 Posted April 16, 2022 Depends for who and depends where. Warsaw Pact and export customers would almost exclusively have R-3S Atoll, rather than newer R-13M missiles. Soviet Union would have higher % of R-13Ms but still primary missile would be R-3S. 4 1 AMD Ryzen 5900X @ 4.95 Ghz / Asus Crosshair VII X470 / 32 GB DDR4 3600 Mhz Cl16 / Radeon 6800XT / Samsung 960 EVO M.2 SSD / Creative SoundBlaster AE-9 / HP Reverb G2 / VIRPIL T-50CM / Thrustmaster TPR Pendular Rudder Pedals / Audio Technica ATH-MSR7
Alexmarine Posted April 17, 2022 Posted April 17, 2022 Given that even the Soviets only started to see the R-13M in 1974 along the early models of the R-60, for the 1969-1972 period the only IR missile you would have seen on MiGs is the R-3S. The R-3R was not cleared for export untill the mid-70s at the earliest, and ended mainly only in some Warpac countries arsenals. But I mean, the Bis itself probably started to get issued to soviet fighters units by the end of 1972/early 1973 so we are really on the edge of the timeframe. A better timeframe for more Bis flying around (at least for Soviets, and maybe the DDR) is from 1975 to 1979 (not counting units still flying them well into the 80s). Remember to take off the countermeasures pods too if you are flying anything pre-80s at the very least 1
MiG21bisFishbedL Posted April 17, 2022 Posted April 17, 2022 2 hours ago, Alexmarine said: Remember to take off the countermeasures pods too if you are flying anything pre-80s at the very least 2 Reformers hate him! This one weird trick found by a bush pilot will make gunfighter obsessed old farts angry at your multi-role carrier deck line up!
Gunfreak Posted April 17, 2022 Author Posted April 17, 2022 5 hours ago, Alexmarine said: Given that even the Soviets only started to see the R-13M in 1974 along the early models of the R-60, for the 1969-1972 period the only IR missile you would have seen on MiGs is the R-3S. The R-3R was not cleared for export untill the mid-70s at the earliest, and ended mainly only in some Warpac countries arsenals. But I mean, the Bis itself probably started to get issued to soviet fighters units by the end of 1972/early 1973 so we are really on the edge of the timeframe. A better timeframe for more Bis flying around (at least for Soviets, and maybe the DDR) is from 1975 to 1979 (not counting units still flying them well into the 80s). Remember to take off the countermeasures pods too if you are flying anything pre-80s at the very least It's for a fictitious scenario with Soviet MiG21s meeting Norwegian F-5s. Norway used the A model, so not the Tiger II. But it's a close as I get, but at least the F-5 can use Sidewinder Bs which I know Norway used. So I was looking foe the correct missiles for the MiG21. 1 i7 13700k @5.2ghz, GTX 3090, 64Gig ram 4800mhz DDR5, M2 drive.
MiG21bisFishbedL Posted April 18, 2022 Posted April 18, 2022 (edited) 2 hours ago, Gunfreak said: It's for a fictitious scenario with Soviet MiG21s meeting Norwegian F-5s. Norway used the A model, so not the Tiger II. But it's a close as I get, but at least the F-5 can use Sidewinder Bs which I know Norway used. So I was looking foe the correct missiles for the MiG21. Hiromachi can correct me on this. I suspect he has better materials than I. I'd imagine: You're looking at the very precipice of this more modern generation of MiG-21 which includes the bis. MiG-21S and MiG-21M come to mind. So, two pairs of R-3S's would be the load out I'd believe you'd run into if patrols bumped into each other. If it's a longer range patrol, it'd be of course the triple tank with a single pair of R-3S's. The bis' performance isn't too far above that kind of MiG-21, too. Provided you don't take into account the emergency reheat where you do get a significant boost of power. But, you're also using the Tiger II, so you've got a significant power bump over the wimpy little A. Balances out a bit? If your fictional scenario grows into a greater conflagration (more than one mission), I'd expect -21 operations to prefer rockets in ground attack as opposed to bombs as the Soviets seemed to love their rocketry from what I've read and found. I can try to find more about numbers of aircraft in a flight, if you'd like. Edited April 18, 2022 by MiG21bisFishbedL 2 Reformers hate him! This one weird trick found by a bush pilot will make gunfighter obsessed old farts angry at your multi-role carrier deck line up!
Gunfreak Posted April 18, 2022 Author Posted April 18, 2022 7 hours ago, MiG21bisFishbedL said: Hiromachi can correct me on this. I suspect he has better materials than I. I'd imagine: You're looking at the very precipice of this more modern generation of MiG-21 which includes the bis. MiG-21S and MiG-21M come to mind. So, two pairs of R-3S's would be the load out I'd believe you'd run into if patrols bumped into each other. If it's a longer range patrol, it'd be of course the triple tank with a single pair of R-3S's. The bis' performance isn't too far above that kind of MiG-21, too. Provided you don't take into account the emergency reheat where you do get a significant boost of power. But, you're also using the Tiger II, so you've got a significant power bump over the wimpy little A. Balances out a bit? If your fictional scenario grows into a greater conflagration (more than one mission), I'd expect -21 operations to prefer rockets in ground attack as opposed to bombs as the Soviets seemed to love their rocketry from what I've read and found. I can try to find more about numbers of aircraft in a flight, if you'd like. That would be great. As of now. It's just a 2 version 2 to dogfight. I'm really waiting for the South Atlantic map so I can get my "Norwegian " fjords. But I'm doing some AI vs AI test on Caucasians. i7 13700k @5.2ghz, GTX 3090, 64Gig ram 4800mhz DDR5, M2 drive.
MiG21bisFishbedL Posted April 20, 2022 Posted April 20, 2022 On 4/18/2022 at 3:09 AM, Gunfreak said: That would be great. As of now. It's just a 2 version 2 to dogfight. I'm really waiting for the South Atlantic map so I can get my "Norwegian " fjords. But I'm doing some AI vs AI test on Caucasians. From what I've found, a two ship formation is the minimum size of an air patrol. As to be expected. Nothing terribly strange to be found here. Reformers hate him! This one weird trick found by a bush pilot will make gunfighter obsessed old farts angry at your multi-role carrier deck line up!
303_Kermit Posted April 27, 2022 Posted April 27, 2022 As people said. '69-'72 there is no MiG21bis as far as I remember. So you may simulate some older versions... MF or M maybe? As for a rockets. R13M was brand new design, and it was "just introduced" , there is however a catch. Russians used to press a brand new equipment first into first line regiments. (It was common in whole Warsaw Pact) - they were sending older equipment to second line units. If you're simulating some engagement - probably you're dealing with a front-line unit. Better equipped and trained. 2
Recommended Posts