metalhaze Posted February 2, 2009 Author Posted February 2, 2009 Yeah imho the radome, cockpit glass and engine nacells on the MiG need more rounding to update it to the SU-25/F-15/A-10 and SU-27 3GO standards.
TOMCATZ Posted February 2, 2009 Posted February 2, 2009 Hello. 3GO standard? :cry: Maybe...I touch these skill in 600years or more. Well, I learned much stoff the last weeks course the comunity helped me very well. So I have to get more experience. Anyways, Thank you all for the great support. Greetings, TOM 1 Born to fly but forced to work.
rattler Posted February 3, 2009 Posted February 3, 2009 Tom, if everyone had to be held to 3G0 standards, nothing would get done. Great job. Continue please.:thumbup:
mikoyan Posted February 3, 2009 Posted February 3, 2009 man I wish I have the time and skills to do some new models for lock-on, what you are doing is a great effort, it takes time, skills and a critic eye to create a model. One thing is being able to build an accurate model and other is to build an model that captures the essence or the soul of the real machine. Keep the good work !
metalhaze Posted February 3, 2009 Author Posted February 3, 2009 Hello. 3GO standard? :cry: Maybe...I touch these skill in 600years or more. Well, I learned much stoff the last weeks course the comunity helped me very well. So I have to get more experience. Anyways, Thank you all for the great support. Greetings, TOM Hi Tom, I wasn't comparing your model to anyone else's when I said that. :doh: I certainly meant no disrespect toward your work. Keep on workin' that MiG dude...BTW I like that last screenshot a lot!
TOMCATZ Posted February 3, 2009 Posted February 3, 2009 (edited) Yes, its hard to correct ALL mistakes in some days. On the left hand site its hard to do all what a complete team did alone. On the right hand site its allways simple to show hundreds of little mistakes at every model! Well, I`m not a proffesional designer who studyed hundreds of different programms. So I`m happy about every helpings -not angry words- thats my reason why I use these forum! Many good builders and symphatic people here. A really perfect higly polygoned model?! Sure- simple while using thousends of polygons! I`ll curioso how does it work in Online-sessions! Anybody wan`t to have a correct model? You can use these nice one: http://www.turbosquid.com/3d-models/mig-29-mig29-3ds/230786 By the way: Why you present me Mig29S pics? However, I`m sure I missunderstud many things. Edited May 20, 2009 by TOMCATZ Born to fly but forced to work.
golfsierra2 Posted February 3, 2009 Posted February 3, 2009 Is it a really good model:mad:??? If you aren’t correcting mistakes in your model, it will be a biggest failure :noexpression:. If you don't like it, do not install it. Tomcatz is doing an excellent job only a very few talented guys are able to accomplish ! kind regards, Raven.... [sigpic]http://www.crc-mindreader.de/CRT/images/Birds2011.gif[/sigpic]
Cpt Stark Posted February 3, 2009 Posted February 3, 2009 Is it a really good model:mad:??? do you need to be in anger to make remarks ? did you ever make any 3Dmodel from scratch ? do you think that your post is constructive in order to help tomcatz to improve this model ? If you aren’t correcting mistakes in your model, it will be a biggest failure :noexpression:. if you consider that the model of tomcatz always contains some mistakes ... just help him by pointing mistakes, comparing photos and screenshots, write some explications but your post don't help Tomcatz if everyone post some non constructive remarks, moders would not want anymore to create new models. we will be happy if Tomcatz still have motivation to improve this model and release it bye 1
VireVolte_tigrou Posted February 3, 2009 Posted February 3, 2009 Anybody wan`t to have a correct model? You can use these nice one: http://www.turbosquid.com/3d-models/3d-mig-fighter-model/283793 I'm sorry, but yours is better... BTW, TurboSquid models are often poor, but always expensive. In fact, your MiG model has a major failure... It should use the same slot than Gripen ! :D
rattler Posted February 3, 2009 Posted February 3, 2009 Tom, don't ever stop what you are doing. It is easy to point out mistakes but it's harder to get to where there is mistakes. In other words don't make negative statements unless you have walked the same path. Built a 3D model. Very few can do this, it takes a lot of time, effort, correcting what you see and then get it into lockon. You are doing great and don't ever stop because someone else does not appreciate what it takes. Been there and I know how it feels but I do it for the enjoyment it brings me and to a bigger majority of people than we think. Keep it up and don't ever stop. Your hard work will always be appreciated by the people that really count. Cheers and remember you have more support here than you know!!!!!! This site would be worse off for some of the things you have already done. Fixing the little things is easy. Getting it in lockon and flying with animation and damage , well lets say not many can do it and you can!!!!!!:thumbup:
Szelma Posted February 4, 2009 Posted February 4, 2009 That's true rattler... Tomcatz dont stop your hard work for our comunity. We still waiting on MIG-29UB:worthy:
S.T.A.LK.E.R. Posted February 4, 2009 Posted February 4, 2009 if you consider that the model of tomcatz always contains some mistakes ... just help him by pointing mistakes, comparing photos and screenshots, write some explications but your post don't help Tomcatz http://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=629338&postcount=71:huh: . I said: if you need help, write me in PM. However, some people think, that TOMACTZ"s model is better than model by Eagle Dynamics. TONCATZ, please write me in PM.
Cpt Stark Posted February 4, 2009 Posted February 4, 2009 http://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=629338&postcount=71:huh: . I said: if you need help, write me in PM. However, some people think, that TOMACTZ"s model is better than model by Eagle Dynamics. TONCATZ, please write me in PM. I already see that ;) I think you didnot have "bad intentions", but the way you wrote what you was thinking (in your previous post) was bad and too "agressive" and maybee TOMCATZ is not a Mig29 "specialist" like you :noexpression: he could consider that his 3D is correct (because making a 3Dmodel means to be a lot of hour in 3Dmax on the model :)) so at the end, he don't have enought retreat to see his own errors (and if he don't see errors, he would not PM you :)) and don't forget TOMCATZ is german ;) maybe he prefer make a Mig29G instead of a C ;) 3D could be different ^^ have a nice day
S.T.A.LK.E.R. Posted February 4, 2009 Posted February 4, 2009 To TOMCATZ: http://depositfiles.com/files/p3qy314m9
BrumTx Posted February 4, 2009 Posted February 4, 2009 Tomcatz PLEASE DON'T STOP MAKING YOUR MOD'S WE NEED THEM!!!!!!! Keep them coming:):):) Remember the 346 Fire Fighters, Medics & Police who died on 9-11....... Selective memory is a wonderful thing, especially when certain posts simply disappear into the ether never to be seen again, unless I have a copy of the original post copied and pasted into word documents and saved .... just in case :) Am I an abusive idiot ? Due to physical incapacity my Wife types my post's for me
S.T.A.LK.E.R. Posted February 4, 2009 Posted February 4, 2009 Hello TOMCATZ. I found some mistakes in your model:). Please, look at the pictures... 1
golfsierra2 Posted February 4, 2009 Posted February 4, 2009 Much, much better !!! Thank you, Stalker ! :thumbup: kind regards, Raven.... [sigpic]http://www.crc-mindreader.de/CRT/images/Birds2011.gif[/sigpic]
Vekkinho Posted February 4, 2009 Posted February 4, 2009 That's a pretty old screenshot of MiG and leading edges of vertical fins have been fixed and look much better as can be seen in latest screenshots! [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Cpt Stark Posted February 5, 2009 Posted February 5, 2009 That's a pretty old screenshot of MiG and leading edges of vertical fins have been fixed and look much better as can be seen in latest screenshots! that's right ;) STALKER : see PM for "screenshots" :smilewink:
TOMCATZ Posted February 6, 2009 Posted February 6, 2009 Hello, ...I was a little bit angry about myself and to directly. So all I can say is sorry. I looked about Stalkers pictures and compared it with my mig and I started to become confuse. So I loaded all my HighRes.blueprints into my 3Dprogram and pulled it over my model. And damm- I started to build the fuselage with absolutly right sizes and many sizes went to hell. Stalker was absolutly right about the nose section, conopy, nozzles and airleron. I fixed some of these parts- primary nozzles, intakes, canopy and nose section. Now the overall look is an complete another one as before. I was really confused. Them I found the reason for many mistakes- I use different blueprints and not all of them are correct. My biggest problems I had was to correct the intakes. I`ll send some pics if I go online next weekend. Thistime my wife had the fantastic idea to paint our flat and buy IKEA-funitures.:) However, I missunderstud a message- I`m sorry. As I sad: Many specialists and even more symphatic people here, My best wishes, TOM Born to fly but forced to work.
shaggy Posted February 6, 2009 Posted February 6, 2009 Sounds really good Tomcatz. Cant wait to se the new pictures :) Intel Core i7-8700 3,20GHz - EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti SC2 - 32Gb Ram - DCS on 500 GB SSD - Windows 10 - Thrusmaster Warthog - Thrustmaster TPR pedals - Track Ir 5 - Samsung Odyssey+ [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] http://www.virtualredarrows.com
VireVolte_tigrou Posted February 6, 2009 Posted February 6, 2009 In fact, here aren't any correct blueprints. Just some are better than others... Of course, they give a basic framework, which often must be corrected, but none is able to describe a complex shape such as a plane. That's why the 3D modeller has to compare his work with a LOT of pictures, which never lie... ;) "Never trust the blueprints" became my motto ! ;)
S.T.A.LK.E.R. Posted February 6, 2009 Posted February 6, 2009 Hello, ...I was a little bit angry about myself and to directly. So all I can say is sorry. I looked about Stalkers pictures and compared it with my mig and I started to become confuse. So I loaded all my HighRes.blueprints into my 3Dprogram and pulled it over my model. And damm- I started to build the fuselage with absolutly right sizes and many sizes went to hell. Stalker was absolutly right about the nose section, conopy, nozzles and airleron. I fixed some of these parts- primary nozzles, intakes, canopy and nose section. Now the overall look is an complete another one as before. I was really confused. Them I found the reason for many mistakes- I use different blueprints and not all of them are correct. My biggest problems I had was to correct the intakes. I`ll send some pics if I go online next weekend. Thistime my wife had the fantastic idea to paint our flat and buy IKEA-funitures.:) However, I missunderstud a message- I`m sorry. As I sad: Many specialists and even more symphatic people here, My best wishes, TOM If you have some questions, please, write me in PM. I think that some blueprints have got mistakes a lot. Because original blueprints are saving in RSK MiG:smartass:. So perhaps the best thing to do would be to make your model by photos, I can sand some photos in new archive. My best wishes:thumbup:, Andrew.
Vekkinho Posted March 1, 2009 Posted March 1, 2009 MiG-29 Hydro systems: http://www.flightlevel350.com/Aircraft_Mikoyan-Gurevich_MiG-29-Airline_Hungary_-_Air_Force_Aviation_Video-8249.html BTW what's up with this mod?! [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
TOMCATZ Posted March 3, 2009 Posted March 3, 2009 (edited) Hi all, well...I sent all my max files and datas up to Andrew. At last time I switch ba´ck to the Eurofighter project after I corrected many mistakes in Mig29`s construction. So I uploaded all stoff into these adress: http://www.fileuploadx.de/205100 Rave´n made a MODMAN- file but couldn`t test it: http://www.fileuploadx.de/882188 My best wishes, TOM Edited March 3, 2009 by TOMCATZ Born to fly but forced to work.
Recommended Posts