UH-60M for DCS

[GrahamReiter]

I know that there is already a UH-60L for DCS, but a study level UH-60M for DCS would be amazing.

[corbu1]

A DCS:UH60 Blackhawk full official module would be fantastic!! It‘s the correct utility buddy to the Apache. I‘d wanna fly missions Blackhawks flying air assault or CSAR while Apache fly cover……

The Mike Model is the latest variant with glass cockpit and autopilot, which would be a beautiful full module.
The existing Lima Model in DCS is a mod, which is really awesome and I love to fly. I‘d also be more than happy if the mod-team got the chance to make it‘s way to a full official module for DCS.

[Nomatic]

Heck yeah. 100% insta buy for me. 

[Kev2go]

Hopefully this is the next rotorary project to come from ED now that ch47f is out.

[Czar66]

7 minutes ago, Kev2go said:

Hopefully this is the next rotorary project to come from ED now that ch47f is out.

but...but but... the Cobra. : (

AH-1S Huey Cobra was/is on the pipeline.
https://forums.eagle.ru/topic/248262-weekend-newsletters-2018/?do=findComment&comment=3517055

[Kev2go]

18 minutes ago, Czar66 said:

but...but but... the Cobra. : (

AH-1S Huey Cobra was/is on the pipeline.
https://forums.eagle.ru/topic/248262-weekend-newsletters-2018/?do=findComment&comment=3517055

 

belsimtek doesn't exist anymore. F4e was on pipeline and even had early developmental screenshots shared by bst but was scrapped but  its ok because it ended  up  coming from another 3rd party anyways.

 

Ah64a was also once on pipeline had some old 3d models of the cockpit but its evident that was scrapped in favour for ah64d. 

If any cobra is done I hope its going to be an ah1w instead of ah1s

 

 

Edited August 13, 2024 by Kev2go

[Proof]

From the Ch-47 Cold Start Video: 

[Gunfreak]

Why do the M, when a 90 early 00 model is much more useful for historical scenarios we can make in DCS. And would probably be much easier to get the references too.

If the M is so important make the M as a paid upgrade like the Black Shark or A10CII. When references become available. And make a 90s Blackhawk now. That can be used for Desert storm, Balkans, much of Afghanistan and much or the Iraq war. As well stuff like Mogadishu stuff.

[Kev2go]

Because there is the uh60L mod. So even if a proper uh60L module would have higher detail in 3d texture and systems modelling I'd rather just get a modern glass cockpit variant to match ah64d and ch47f.

Edited August 13, 2024 by Kev2go

[Gunfreak]

9 minutes ago, Kev2go said:

Because there is the uh60L mod. So even if a proper uh60L module would have higher detail in 3d texture and systems modelling I'd rather just get a modern glass cockpit variant to match ah64d and ch47f.

 

But mods can't be used in campaigns, or official missions, and only a few select servers use mods.

And there's always the possibility that mods will permanently break. They can also break DCS. And it doesn't have AI side gunners.

[Bob_Petuss]

53 minutes ago, Gunfreak said:

Зачем M, когда модель 90-х ранних 00-х гораздо полезнее для исторических сценариев, которые мы можем сделать в DCS. И, вероятно, было бы намного проще получить ссылки.

Если M так важен, сделайте M платным обновлением, как Black Shark или A10CII. Когда появятся ссылки. И сделайте Blackhawk 90-х сейчас. Его можно использовать для «Бури в пустыне», Балкан, большей части Афганистана и многого в войне в Ираке. А также для таких вещей, как Могадишо.

Oh, it would be magical to make an extension for UH-1H in the form of UH-1Y. But these are just dreams(((

[Czar66]

5 hours ago, Kev2go said:

 

belsimtek doesn't exist anymore. F4e was on pipeline and even had early developmental screenshots shared by bst but was scrapped but  its ok because it ended  up  coming from another 3rd party anyways.

 

Ah64a was also once on pipeline had some old 3d models of the cockpit but its evident that was scrapped in favour for ah64d. 

If any cobra is done I hope its going to be an ah1w instead of ah1s

 

 

 

Understood, but wasn't Belsintek absorbed by ED, hence ED started pumping out helicopters after? This would be why I'd presume the pipeline would stay as they were.

The Apache ended up coming out although it is really a no brainer to build a module for it..

Thanks btw.

Edited August 13, 2024 by Czar66

[Kev2go]

12 hours ago, Proof said:

From the Ch-47 Cold Start Video: 

 

Makes me wonder what documentantation does ED lack besides operators manual? Via  google search you can find TM 1-1520-280-10 ( UH60M operators manual) published 2017.

 its weird they find documentation on a Ch47F ( It was only supposed to be a 2007 variant but then ED stated on sale page its a  circa 2011-2013  Ch47F implying they found more up to date manuals)  but cant find it for a UH60M which entered operational service in a similar timeframe as the Ch47F's? 

 

Ultimately both CH47F and Uh60M have a similar level of avionics. Neither have any weapon systems apart from door guns. The chief difference between the two is just category they fall into, Chinook is heavy lift, Blackhawk medium lift.

 

Edited August 14, 2024 by Kev2go

[rob10]

3 hours ago, Kev2go said:

Makes me wonder what documentantation does ED lack besides operators manual? Via  google search you can find TM 1-1520-280-10 ( UH60M operators manual) published 2017.

 its weird they find documentation on a Ch47F ( It was only supposed to be a 2007 variant but then ED stated on sale page its a  circa 2011-2013  Ch47F implying they found more up to date manuals)  but cant find it for a UH60M which entered service only a couple years later after the first Ch47F's?

It's not just a matter of FINDING documentation, it's a matter of finding documentation that they can LEGALLY use.  And there's lots of little details that mean they can or can't use it.

[Kev2go]

43 minutes ago, rob10 said:

It's not just a matter of FINDING documentation, it's a matter of finding documentation that they can LEGALLY use.  And there's lots of little details that mean they can or can't use it.

nearly all of the modules be it by ED or 3rd parties are based on documentation that is  marked with ITAR/FOUO restrictions. SO i don't know what they mean by "public" as none of them with such markings are technically supposed to be "public". So i don't know what legal loophole they use to use for any such modules, hence why its a moot argument to even bring up against a potential module that is no different in said regards to sort of documentation needed. There's nothing more for either of us to say unless you are privy to the behind the scenes  inner workings on these particular matters within these development teams.

Edited August 14, 2024 by Kev2go

[Czar66]

19 minutes ago, Kev2go said:

nearly all of the modules be it by ED or 3rd parties are based on documentation that is  marked with ITAR/FOUO restrictions. SO i don't know what they mean by "public" as none of them with such markings are technically supposed to be "public". So i don't know what legal loophole they use to use for any such modules, hence why its a moot argument to even bring up against a potential module that is no different in said regards to sort of documentation needed.

 

"Public" is not the right word. "Unclassified" is.

It has been stated by community managers and staff countless times against sharing leaked documents, even worse using them for development. Keyword is: "leaked".

[Kev2go]

15 minutes ago, Czar66 said:

"Public" is not the right word. "Unclassified" is.

It has been stated by community managers and staff countless times against sharing leaked documents, even worse using them for development. Keyword is: "leaked".

IF thats your idea of classification. ( which its not accurate) then i could  say on that thinking that 95% of modules in DCS are based on "leaks".

Edited August 14, 2024 by Kev2go

[Czar66]

10 hours ago, Kev2go said:

IF thats your idea of classification. ( which its not accurate) then i could  say on that thinking that 95% of modules in DCS are based on "leaks".

 

I don't know what you're on about. I can't comment on it.

[MAXsenna]

Why do the M, when a 90 early 00 model is much more useful for historical scenarios we can make in DCS. And would probably be much easier to get the references too.
If the M is so important make the M as a paid upgrade like the Black Shark or A10CII. When references become available. And make a 90s Blackhawk now. That can be used for Desert storm, Balkans, much of Afghanistan and much or the Iraq war. As well stuff like Mogadishu stuff.

Wildly speculating here. They might want to have it done in the pro version, while still being able to "give" it to us.

Sent from my SM-A536B using Tapatalk

[Bushog]

hey I'm not sure which topic I should use, I had UH60 in my DCS . I had to update my pc I down loaded dcs to my d drive not c because it has more room , I can't load the 60, my saved game folder is on my c drive is that the issue? the 60 is one of my favorites, any help is appreciated

[MAXsenna]

23 minutes ago, Bushog said:

hey I'm not sure which topic I should use, I had UH60 in my DCS . I had to update my pc I down loaded dcs to my d drive not c because it has more room , I can't load the 60, my saved game folder is on my c drive is that the issue? the 60 is one of my favorites, any help is appreciated

This is the wishlist thread for the UH-60M. The UH-60L community module has its own thread in the drivable/flyable mods section. 

Anyway, it needs to be in Saved Games DCS mods "UH-60L". Post your DCS log in that thread with additional information you might have. 

Cheers! 

[Bushog]

thanks