Jump to content

Nomatic

Members
  • Posts

    200
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Nomatic

  1. so much yes. A modern 53... yes.... yes, please.
  2. A physicalized and physics based destruction model would be real nice.
  3. Hey Everyone and ED, I have not found this request before, so I'm setting a new topic for it. I would love to see a public tracker showing aircraft that have been wish listed and what their interest level has been. A change to the wishlist functionality was deployed previously - it was for us users to Rate a wish listed item to show interest (the bubbles or stars in the upper right of a topic). Is there a way to turn this into an automated graph with a count of ratings? For Example - one row would be the P38 Lighting on the wishlist. This would have a bar showing the amount of ratings given by us users. This count of ratings would identity it's level of interest and how high/low the interest is in comparison to other wish listed aircraft. Further - it can help us provide more specific data when wish-listing an AC, for example requesting a Fixed Wing AC vs a Rotorcraft; providing more specific conditions to narrow the report. That would allow us to identify what planes vs helo's people are interested in. I'm asking for this to see if we can get a visual representation of what AC have a lot of public interest. This would require clean up as modules that may be on that list are deployed to production or chosen for recreation. I don't have all the answers, but I'm assuming this forum already has some version of tracking this information for the developers on the back end. And the graph wouldn't need to be all encompassing - maybe just the top 10 items. Thoughts? Opinions? I'm just really interested in a single, automated if possible, visual representation of what people are interested in the most. Right now, I can mark an item as interested - but how does it stack up to say - the B25 wishlisted item? Or the H60 wishlisted item? This may be a heavy lift, and I understand if that's a no go right now, but I still want to get the request out there.
  4. Agreed, unfortunately I think you are correct. Maybe one day we’ll get a digital combat simulation for maritime warfare.
  5. So you have it.. https://forum.dcs.world/topic/325555-ground-bomb-explosion-effect/#comment-5216197
  6. I really hope either combined arms gets a major refresh, or we get a major Troop/ground forces AI update. I would love to see troops embarking and disembarking my aircraft; C-130, MI-24, Huey, <profanity>hook, all of them. We’ll see. ED has a lot on their plate at the moment, so maybe in a few years. I’m hopeful though. I’m very excited for the 47. I can’t wait to see it in the game.
  7. It sounds like the MT option will be enabled this next OB update. I’m looking forward to seeing if this changes with the 7950X3D. It’s on my radar as my next CPU as well.
  8. Nomatic

    P38L

    +1 Would love a P-38
  9. Agreed with both. Would love more logistics gameplay. Rearming FOBs and FARPS could be great multiplayer gamplay. Same with medevac.
  10. With the core enhancements coming, I agree. This needs to be updated. Comms in VR sucks atm.
  11. For me.. Modern H-60 EH-101 CSAR Missions Updated/Improved Troop Movement/Deployment/Fast Rope Animations And a Dynamic Mission Generator. Like a quick mission generator, different than the dynamic campaign.
  12. I just did a search and didn’t find any threads asking for a Eurocopter Tiger. Gotta be honest, that surprises me. I fell in love with here because of James Bond. I’d love to see one in the game. It would be nice to see how the old world accomplishes the Attack Helicopter role. Can’t lie, I’d also dig an NH-90. While not Eurocopter, an EH-101 Merlin would be great as well. I’d buy them all, no questions asked.
  13. I would pay for a FF F-15C. I hope it happens.
  14. I'm also deflated - but let's clarify a few things. The initial release will be dual core (or three including sound), but the plan is to expand from there. Effectively, they're going to separate graphical and logic threads, then multi-thread those individual threads. How long that takes, who knows and I'm not holding my breath, but I do hope that we get at least an appreciable performance hike - most especially in VR - with the upcoming release. But it may be a (long) while until DCS uses all cores. At least, that's how I interpret their post. We'll see though.
  15. Regarding the multicore & graphics engine update- this may seem arbitrary, but will you indicate when/if promotional videos are made using the new build? I know that may seem useless, but would be awesome to get 'eye's on', so to speak. Thanks! edited: changed wording to sound less dumb
  16. Agreed - I was just coming to request the Eastern Seaboard. Would be massive, but would be great.
  17. Rotors look good, I like the new effect. They just seemed to be visibly repeating, like a stutter. I'm excited to buy! After multicore release, obviously.
  18. An H-60 would be an instabuy for for me. Hauling trash and ass sounds like fun. Plus CSAR and the usual cool guy stuff. But not vert rep. No thanks. FTS. Lol
  19. Hell yes. It’s not like there isn’t an incredible abundance of ordnance videos from the last 20-30 years. Lol. I would love to see more variety and effect. I’m hoping that’ll come after the eventual EDGE modernization and optimization coming eventually. That way we can enjoy some frames and some flames!! p.s. I would also love to see more diversity in the destruction animations and rubble. Maybe eventually entirely dynamic destruction. That would be cool.
×
×
  • Create New...