Went from 2080 to 7900XTX.

[r_vandenbroek]

Hello there!

I’m not much of a benchmarkers but thought I’d share my initial and bery crude benchmark results. 
I went from a 2080 non-super to the AMD reference 7900XTX. 

On the Supercarrier, in rain, I went from 40 to 84 fps. On a low level run over Cyprus, I went from 49 to 113. 
 

All settings were kept the same. There is still some noticable microstuttering from time to time with frametimes bouncing a little. I’ll include a graph below. Anyway, expect a good doubling of FPS if you bite the bullet!
 

I’m on a monitor, 5120x1440. MSAA off.

Edited December 25, 2022 by r_vandenbroek

[Mr_sukebe]

In VR or on a monitor?

[applesinduck]

Do you mind sharing the settings? I'm still on the fence whether to go full idiot and buy 4090 or 7900XTX.

[r_vandenbroek]

4 hours ago, Mr_sukebe said:

In VR or on a monitor?

Monitor, 5120x1440

3 hours ago, applesinduck said:

Do you mind sharing the settings? I'm still on the fence whether to go full idiot and buy 4090 or 7900XTX.

I can have a look later. It’s meant as a relative performance comparison though!

[MadKreator]

12 hours ago, r_vandenbroek said:

Hello there!

I’m not much of a benchmarkers but thought I’d share my initial and bery crude benchmark results. 
I went from a 2080 non-super to the AMD reference 7900XTX. 

On the Supercarrier, in rain, I went from 40 to 84 fps. On a low level run over Cyprus, I went from 49 to 113. 
 

All settings were kept the same. There is still some noticable microstuttering from time to time with frametimes bouncing a little. I’ll include a graph below. Anyway, expect a good doubling of FPS if you bite the bullet!
 

I’m on a monitor, 5120x1440. MSAA off.

 

I just went from a 3080 to 4080 on 5120x1440 and while on other games it was a huge jump  in performance ( cod settings maxed out went from 90/100 ish fps to 195/205 ish fps), FS2020 I can run everything on ultra including ray tracing and its silky smooth(huge cities like Tokyo or NYC put it down in the 50’s).  DCS gained some but not by  much when lots of objects are in view or big missions. Going straight up in the sky I jumped from 100 ish to 160 ish fps with most setting on high with msaa x2. DCS’s hinderance is definitely processor bottlenecked. I got the microstutters here and there on both cards. It is nice to be able to turn up some settings and still get similar fps as before. Running a pretty good Syria mission on liberation last night and fps wasn’t much better since its logical things clogging the pipeline. I think once/ if/when/hopefully Multicore comes out, if done right we will start to see the bigger cards shine like they should.  I haven’t tried VR yet to compare, but I’m convinced DCS is the worst game to try to compare hardware on Same when I went from 2080 to 3080. It Improved but not near the improvement I saw in every other game, thats for sure. 

Edited December 25, 2022 by MadKreator

[Thinder]

On 12/25/2022 at 8:48 AM, r_vandenbroek said:

Hello there!

I’m not much of a benchmarkers but thought I’d share my initial and bery crude benchmark results. 
I went from a 2080 non-super to the AMD reference 7900XTX. 

On the Supercarrier, in rain, I went from 40 to 84 fps. On a low level run over Cyprus, I went from 49 to 113. 
 

All settings were kept the same. There is still some noticable microstuttering from time to time with frametimes bouncing a little. I’ll include a graph below. Anyway, expect a good doubling of FPS if you bite the bullet!
 

I’m on a monitor, 5120x1440. MSAA off.

 

In theory I should get mine within a week, I'll be starting to set up my system and conduct back-to-back tests on 3D Mark first before getting into DCS. I'll post my results in a relevant topic if not this one. Happy New Year.

Update: It's been shiped to me today.

Edited January 4, 2023 by Thinder