Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, Cylus Scratcher Resi said:

Functional ALARM anti-radiation missile with both direct and indirect modes.

Perfect for the upcoming Tornado and Eurofighter Typhoon.

Its not like as if we already have them....

Screen_230513_002657.png

Screen_230513_003733.png

Screen_230513_003741.png

My skins

Posted

True, but then I haven't found a way to get the AI to use them in indirect mode ever. Coming to think of it, it's already rather hard to get the AI to use them at all.

Posted

We are getting the IDS Tonka so it'll be the HARM missile and I believe the EF doesn't use the missile...

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

The only way to make sense out of change is to plunge into it, move with it, and join the dance.

"Me, the 13th Duke of Wybourne, here on the ED forums at 3 'o' clock in the morning, with my reputation. Are they mad.."

https://ko-fi.com/joey45

 

Posted

More advanced weapon modeling in general would make big difference in the sim. More varied behavior means weapons have different capabilities and need to be used/defended against differently. And of course it's also more realistic.

Awaiting: DCS F-15C

Win 10 i5-9600KF 4.6 GHz 64 GB RAM RTX2080Ti 11GB -- Win 7 64 i5-6600K 3.6 GHz 32 GB RAM GTX970 4GB -- A-10C, F-5E, Su-27, F-15C, F-14B, F-16C missions in User Files

 

Posted
On 5/12/2023 at 5:39 PM, Mike_Romeo said:

Its not like as if we already have them....

Screen_230513_002657.png

Screen_230513_003733.png

Screen_230513_003741.png

 

What made the ALARM paticualrly nasty was that it would climb 45000 feet deploy a parachute then reignite a second stage if the radar turned on again. 

  • Like 1
Posted
On 5/13/2023 at 1:36 AM, joey45 said:

We are getting the IDS Tonka so it'll be the HARM missile and I believe the EF doesn't use the missile...

I know the Tornado that is in planning is going to be a Luftwaffe IDS, but that doesn't quite disqualify the idea of getting a proper modelling of the ALARM missile reality in DCS (as MR pointed out they are in the sim albeit somewhat lacking). Perhaps one might be persuaded to include such an improved, actually working ALARM missile for use in said Tonka, to stand in for a Gr 1; as far as I know there is no technical reason for it not to work on a German Tornado, just that Germany didn't buy any.

As for the 'nope that would be wrong because no Luftwaffe IDS carried an ALARM operationally' talk, I am not even that sure any IDS ever carried a HARM either - ECR variants routinely do.

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Kang said:

I know the Tornado that is in planning is going to be a Luftwaffe IDS, but that doesn't quite disqualify the idea of getting a proper modelling of the ALARM missile reality in DCS (as MR pointed out they are in the sim albeit somewhat lacking). Perhaps one might be persuaded to include such an improved, actually working ALARM missile for use in said Tonka, to stand in for a Gr 1; as far as I know there is no technical reason for it not to work on a German Tornado, just that Germany didn't buy any.

As for the 'nope that would be wrong because no Luftwaffe IDS carried an ALARM operationally' talk, I am not even that sure any IDS ever carried a HARM either - ECR variants routinely do.

I don't care if the German tornadoes never used the ALARM they could be used by AI RAF Tornadoes. 

  • Like 1
Posted
On 5/13/2023 at 12:36 AM, joey45 said:

We are getting the IDS Tonka so it'll be the HARM missile and I believe the EF doesn't use the missile...

I agree. RAF retired them from inventory at least a decade ago and I don't think they ever carried them on anything but the Tornado.

  • Like 1
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...