Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Yesterday, I flew some DACT vs an F-15E. This is what the eagle driver reported:

Also, that MiG-19 has a ridiculously large RCS in DCS. I was able to get a solid TWS track on the MiG-19 at over 70NM while schurem in his MiG-21 didn’t even create a TWS return at this range. I was able to get blips of him in RWS but I was only able to track him in STT below 70NM… Something funky going on there.

  • Like 1

I5 9600KF, 32GB, 3080ti, G2, PointCTRL

Posted

In DCS, the Mig-19 has a RCS value of 5 while the Mig-21 has one of 3.

I'm far from an expert on RCS, but 2m² more doesn't seem to be a ridiculous amount.

  • 2 months later...
Posted (edited)

What are the units? 5 m² ?

This is an interesting chart (found in the F-16 section):

null

image.png

Edited by Tiger-II

Motorola 68000 | 1 Mb | Debug port

"When performing a forced landing, fly the aircraft as far into the crash as possible." - Bob Hoover.

The JF-17 is not better than the F-16; it's different. It's how you fly that counts.

"An average aircraft with a skilled pilot, will out-perform the superior aircraft with an average pilot."

  • 3 months later...
Posted
Am 13.1.2024 um 13:56 schrieb schurem:

Yesterday, I flew some DACT vs an F-15E. This is what the eagle driver reported:

Also, that MiG-19 has a ridiculously large RCS in DCS. I was able to get a solid TWS track on the MiG-19 at over 70NM while schurem in his MiG-21 didn’t even create a TWS return at this range. I was able to get blips of him in RWS but I was only able to track him in STT below 70NM… Something funky going on there.

Normal thing for the F15 to track a RCS 5 target at 70nm

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...