TomcatFan1976 Posted December 18, 2024 Posted December 18, 2024 5 hours ago, Naquaii said: Just to clarify, this is a change in the AWG-9, nothing has been changed with the missiles themselves. But it should definitely help with some of the lost track situations. At least it's a start....
teewhite7 Posted January 7 Author Posted January 7 On 12/18/2024 at 4:04 PM, Karon said: Pulse does not guide the Phoenix. It is a glorified maddog with some angles provided until the missile magically acquires the target you locked initially. It's a launch-and-leave TWS, if you will. Add some manual loft to it, and it will go quite far. It's a neat trick to show your friends. Example here. Also: > i dont have tacview, i never really used it > i have a feeling that that multiple aim-54s are colliding, to me thats a big sign of something going on You have just proved why you need TacView. Jokes aside, TV is single-handedly the most important software you can add to DCS. It teaches you how things work or don't, and exponentially accelerates your growth as a virtual pilot. Grab it, it's free Btw, I had two SD-10 collide whilst testing for my recent video about Active Radar Homing missiles, and I remember even managed to have one Phoenix chasing a previously fired one. However, the setup was outside DCS' laws of physics. I think maybe I worded that wrong- what I meant is that multiple 54s colliding is a fact, & I'm seeing it over and over again 1 Intel i9-10900K 3.7GHz RTX 2080 Super Windforce OC G. Skill Trident Z DDR4 3600MHz (128GB) Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe M.2 (2TB) HP Reverb G2,WINWING Super Taurus, Super libra, PTO & PCR panels
draconus Posted January 7 Posted January 7 3 hours ago, teewhite7 said: I think maybe I worded that wrong- what I meant is that multiple 54s colliding is a fact, & I'm seeing it over and over again Can you reproduce it in SP short track? Win10 i7-10700KF 32GB RTX4070S Quest 3 T16000M VPC CDT-VMAX TFRP FC3 F-14A/B F-15E CA SC NTTR PG Syria
Karon Posted January 7 Posted January 7 6 hours ago, teewhite7 said: I think maybe I worded that wrong- what I meant is that multiple 54s colliding is a fact, & I'm seeing it over and over again Ah, sorry, I understand now. I often see the problem in my missile test mission, and it is very easy to reproduce. The cause is the low Vc of the first shot that leads the follow-ups (at decreased separation) to arrive even earlier than the first one. Quite often they smash into each other. However, I've never seen this happening in the wild, only once with SD-10s. Post a Tacview track, it would make everything easier. 1 "Cogito, ergo RIO" Virtual Backseaters Volume I: F-14 Radar Intercept Officer - Fifth Public Draft Virtual Backseaters Volume II: F-4E Weapon Systems Officer - Scrapped Phantom Articles: Air-to-Air and APQ-120 | F-4E Must-know manoevure: SYNC-Z-TURN
draconus Posted January 7 Posted January 7 6 minutes ago, Karon said: Post a Tacview track On 12/18/2024 at 8:39 PM, teewhite7 said: Nah, unfortunately i dont have tacview, i never really used it 1 Win10 i7-10700KF 32GB RTX4070S Quest 3 T16000M VPC CDT-VMAX TFRP FC3 F-14A/B F-15E CA SC NTTR PG Syria
Karon Posted January 8 Posted January 8 23 hours ago, draconus said: I know, but this post was opened over a month ago. If, after such a long time, he still struggles and TacView can solve everything in 30 seconds, perhaps it's better to get it, isn't it? I mean, it's free. 4 "Cogito, ergo RIO" Virtual Backseaters Volume I: F-14 Radar Intercept Officer - Fifth Public Draft Virtual Backseaters Volume II: F-4E Weapon Systems Officer - Scrapped Phantom Articles: Air-to-Air and APQ-120 | F-4E Must-know manoevure: SYNC-Z-TURN
Recommended Posts