add the lack of details

[Arad12]

there is a lot of missing things in the map like highways and poor cities details or like Historical landmark and building in the map ( Masada , University of Haifa , unifil helipad near naqoura )

[Panny]

I think you need to be much more specific than anecdotal evidence such as just 'Masada , University of Haifa , unifil helipad near naqoura'.

The title 'add the lack of details' is useful to no one

[Arad12]

11 hours ago, Panny said:

I think you need to be much more specific than anecdotal evidence such as just 'Masada , University of Haifa , unifil helipad near naqoura'.

The title 'add the lack of details' is useful to no one

it is just an example for things that are missing in the game (at least for me )

 

[Rudel_chw]

2 hours ago, Arad12 said:

it is just an example for things that are missing in the game (at least for me )

 

 

Honestly, I care more for details on the airbases than landmarks, else I would be flying that other civil Sim that can't be mentioned  

[Minsky]

15 hours ago, Arad12 said:

it is just an example for things that are missing in the game (at least for me )

The devs call these the "medium detail zones", and as far as I understand, they weren't meant to have any landmarks. Only a couple airbases for flying to neighboring countries, surrounded by generic OSM data.

Unless they choose to further develop these zones by adding more airfields, I wouldn't expect anything you have listed.

[Minsky]

On 7/15/2025 at 11:40 AM, Panny said:

I think you need to be much more specific than anecdotal evidence such as just 'Masada , University of Haifa , unifil helipad near naqoura'.

Anyone with the basic knowledge of the area (which obviously includes the devs) understands that OP is referring to the most prominent landmark in Haifa and to the UN headquarters in Lebanon. Being "much more specific" would require him to provide the building's blueprints.

On 7/15/2025 at 11:40 AM, Panny said:

The title 'add the lack of details' is useful to no one

How else would you call a wish list topic that requests more POIs for a map that is missing dozens (if not hundreds) of them?

 

[Minsky]

14 hours ago, Rudel_chw said:

Honestly, I care more for details on the airbases than landmarks, else I would be flying that other civil Sim that can't be mentioned  

They are both important. Personally, however, I would prefer a landmark that makes a city recognizable and unique over a correct HAS model.

[Northstar98]

On 7/16/2025 at 1:39 PM, Minsky said:

They are both important. Personally, however, I would prefer a landmark that makes a city recognizable and unique over a correct HAS model.

The problem though is when the wrong HAS model is so wrong to the point it bears very little resemblance to the real place (e.g. Gütersloh) or even worse, stops you from basing aircraft that were really based there (such as A-10s at Spangdahlem).

Edited Friday at 11:57 AM by Northstar98

[Minsky]

1 hour ago, Northstar98 said:

The problem though is when the wrong HAS model is so wrong to the point it bears very little resemblance to the real place (e.g. Gütersloh) or even worse, stops you from basing aircraft that were really based there (such as A-10s at Spangdahlem).

If it breaks something, as in your example, then it's a bug that needs fixing. No arguing here.

But if it's purely cosmetic, then I'm not bothered. Considering there's likely a very tight budget for a number of unique objects they can put on a map. And I would rather have it spent on a city-defining building or monument instead of a slightly different shelter.

Contrary to what some people may believe, landmarks are not useless eye-candies or a waste of resources.