tigershark1-1 Posted yesterday at 12:40 AM Posted yesterday at 12:40 AM I've been wondering about this. While the visual differences are immediately apparent, are there any differences in the in-game flight models? And what might those differences be? I've heard that the UK Corsair saw improved roll rate due to its clipped wingtips – is this also reproduced in DCSF4U?
-Rudel- Posted yesterday at 01:42 AM Posted yesterday at 01:42 AM The tests that the FAA performed, found that the rollrate is negligible compared to the standard US wing rollrate. https://magnitude-3.com/ https://www.facebook.com/magnitude3llc https://www.youtube.com/@magnitude_3 i9 13900K, 128GB RAM, RTX 4090, Win10Pro, 2 x 2TB SSD, 1 x 15TB SSD U.2 i9 10980XE, 128GB RAM, RTX 3090Ti, Win10 Pro, 2 x 256GB SSD, 4 x 512GB SSD RAID 0, 6 x 4TB HDD RAID 6, 9361-8i RAID Controller i7 4960X, 64GB RAM, GTX Titan X Black, Win10 Pro, 512GB PCIe SSD, 2 x 256GB SSD
Saxman Posted yesterday at 04:30 AM Posted yesterday at 04:30 AM There's anecdotal claims the clipped wing Corsairs had a faster sink rate during landing, but AFAIK there's no actual flight tests that confirm this.
tigershark1-1 Posted yesterday at 08:36 AM Author Posted yesterday at 08:36 AM 6 hours ago, -Rudel- said: FAA が実施したテストでは、ロールレートが米国の標準的な翼のロールレートと比較して無視できるほど小さいことが判明しました。 Is the flight model the same?
-Rudel- Posted 13 hours ago Posted 13 hours ago Yes https://magnitude-3.com/ https://www.facebook.com/magnitude3llc https://www.youtube.com/@magnitude_3 i9 13900K, 128GB RAM, RTX 4090, Win10Pro, 2 x 2TB SSD, 1 x 15TB SSD U.2 i9 10980XE, 128GB RAM, RTX 3090Ti, Win10 Pro, 2 x 256GB SSD, 4 x 512GB SSD RAID 0, 6 x 4TB HDD RAID 6, 9361-8i RAID Controller i7 4960X, 64GB RAM, GTX Titan X Black, Win10 Pro, 512GB PCIe SSD, 2 x 256GB SSD
AndyJWest Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago I'd be surprised if the small change to the wingtip profile made any meaningful difference to performance in real life. Maybe with very careful testing they might have been able to detect a difference, but why would they bother? It needed to be done (to fit some RN carriers), so they did it. Pilots who expected a difference might have thought there was one, but given all the other variables, there's no particular reason to assume this was more than imagination. And even if there was a difference, we don't have data on it...
Raven (Elysian Angel) Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago Were wings not clipped to improve low-altitude performance? That’s why the Spitfire’s wings were clipped in some variants, I believe… Spoiler Ryzen 7 9800X3D | 96GB G.Skill Ripjaws M5 Neo DDR5-6000 | Asus ProArt RTX 4080 Super | ASUS ROG Strix X870E-E GAMING | Samsung 990Pro 2TB + 990Pro 4TB NMVe | VR: Varjo Aero VPC MT-50CM2 grip on VPForce Rhino with Z-curve extension | VPC CM3 throttle | VPC CP2 + 3 | FSSB R3L | VPC Rotor TCS Plus base with SharKa-50 grip | Everything mounted on Monstertech MFC-1 | VPC R1-Falcon pedals with damper | Pro Flight Trainer Puma OpenXR | PD 1.0 | 100% render resolution | DCS graphics settings Win11 Pro 24H2 - VBS/HAGS/Game Mode ON
Scotch75 Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago I believe they were clipped to fit into the slightly smaller British carriers.Cheers!Sent from my SM-G998B using Tapatalk W10 Home 64Bit, Intel Skylake I5 6600K 3.50GHz, ASUS ROG Stryx Z270F MoBo, 64GB G.Skill RipJaws V DDR4 3200 RAM, Samsung 960 Pro 512GB M.2 SSD (OS), Samsung 850 Pro 512GB SSD, 2TB Seagate SDHD, 2TB WD Green HDD, Gigabyte 3060 12GB VRAM
AndyJWest Posted 10 hours ago Posted 10 hours ago 8 minutes ago, Scotch75 said: I believe they were clipped to fit into the slightly smaller British carriers. Cheers! Sent from my SM-G998B using Tapatalk Yup. Sources say by 8 inches - not sure if that's per tip, or overall. Either way, it was because some RN carriers had hangers which were just too low to take an unclipped Corsair with wings folded. There are a lot of myths floating around with regard to RN Corsairs, and the idea that this minor modification was made for any more significant reason is one of them. The RN also operated land-based Corsairs, unclipped, so they clearly didn't think it mattered otherwise.
Holbeach Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago 1 hour ago, AndyJWest said: Yup. Sources say by 8 inches - not sure if that's per tip, or overall. Either way, it was because some RN carriers had hangers which were just too low to take an unclipped Corsair with wings folded. There are a lot of myths floating around with regard to RN Corsairs, and the idea that this minor modification was made for any more significant reason is one of them. The RN also operated land-based Corsairs, unclipped, so they clearly didn't think it mattered otherwise. It was too low for Corsairs because the armoured deck, which was 4 inches thick, produced a lot of top weight, so it had to be as low as possible to maintain stability. This created a hangar much reduced in height from a US carrier. Luckily the wing tips could be removed. History might have been very different otherwise. .. ASUS 2600K 3.8. P8Z68-V. ASUS ROG Strix RTX 2080Ti, RAM 16gb Corsair. M2 NVME 2gb. 2 SSD. 3 HDD. 1 kW ps. X-52. Saitek pedals. ..
Saxman Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago 2 hours ago, Raven (Elysian Angel) said: Were wings not clipped to improve low-altitude performance? That’s why the Spitfire’s wings were clipped in some variants, I believe… Those clipped-wing Spits (and the A6M3 Model 32) were clipped CONSIDERABLY more than the Corsair's. 1
Hiob Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago (edited) 2 hours ago, Raven (Elysian Angel) said: Were wings not clipped to improve low-altitude performance? That’s why the Spitfire’s wings were clipped in some variants, I believe… I think it was to improve roll-rate. I can't think of any other flight dynamics benefit. The induced drag is smaller with rounded wingtips if I'm not mistaken (that's why the spit has them in the first place I guess). But I might be completely mistaken - that's out of my league to be honest. Edited 9 hours ago by Hiob 1 "Muß ich denn jedes Mal, wenn ich sauge oder saugblase den Schlauchstecker in die Schlauchnut schieben?"
Saxman Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago 1 hour ago, Hiob said: I think it was to improve roll-rate. I can't think of any other flight dynamics benefit. The induced drag is smaller with rounded wingtips if I'm not mistaken (that's why the spit has them in the first place I guess). But I might be completely mistaken - that's out of my league to be honest. Correct, the clipped wings were to improve roll rate. However, as I stated they were considerably more clipped than what was done to the Corsair.
Recommended Posts