AC130 Posted yesterday at 06:45 PM Posted yesterday at 06:45 PM With the upcoming addition of the F-35 and its advanced features like the AN/ASQ-239 ew suite bringing offensive electronic warfare, it could be a good time to introduce specialized electronic attack aircraft like the EF-111 and/or EA-6B to DCS.
twistking Posted 23 hours ago Posted 23 hours ago 9 minutes ago, AndyJWest said: Good luck finding any documentation... Fair. Could be interesting as AI aircraft though... 1 My improved* wishlist after a decade with DCS *now with 17% more wishes compared to the original
Kang Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Could be interesting, but would require the whole EW side of things in DCS to at least have a simple modeling that is reasonably consistent throughout the world. Not even talking about the whole multiplayer balance thoughts that I understand many people don't care about, but in any scenario such a concept would be wildly disappointing if it was only effective for a select few targets and others were completely immune. 2
twistking Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Just now, Kang said: [...] but in any scenario such a concept would be wildly disappointing if it was only effective for a select few targets and others were completely immune. Amen! DCS needs consistency... and i'm not even a PvP guy. 2 My improved* wishlist after a decade with DCS *now with 17% more wishes compared to the original
Silver_Dragon Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 19 minutes ago, twistking said: Amen! DCS needs consistency... and i'm not even a PvP guy. This isn't about "balance," it's about reality. If you can't build something because there's no documentation (since much of that information is classified), then good luck trying to invent its functionality on your own (it's like trying to add both elctronic offensive and defensive capabilities to a ship)... For Work/Gaming: 28" Philips 246E Monitor - Ryzen 7 1800X - 32 GB DDR4 - nVidia RTX1080 - SSD 860 EVO 1 TB / 860 QVO 1 TB / 860 QVO 2 TB - Win10 Pro - TM HOTAS Warthog / TPR / MDF
MAXsenna Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago This isn't about "balance," it's about reality. If you can't build something because there's no documentation (since much of that information is classified), then good luck trying to invent its functionality on your own (it's like trying to add both elctronic offensive and defensive capabilities to a ship)...He never mentioned "balance", he specifically wrote consistency, and in this context it means that it should be on the same level of "reality" across all the modules.You are of course correct about the documentation. Cheers! Sent from my SM-A536B using Tapatalk 1
Recommended Posts