Request for a legacy SPO-15 realism option

[=MiG=karapus78]

7 hours ago, Thirsty said:

No, I think you need to read the answer again.

 

 

And no again, might be lanauge barrier here, but what you saying is about something completly different.
For following the logic that you are saying, everything that is unrealistic (labels, F-16s with 4 harms, magic rwrs, list goes on) or just a big estimation should be removed from DCS as a whole since they can't be authentic, what is never going to happen.
cough F-35

And again, this is a toggleable options in the mission editor (potentionally in the special menu, but enforced by the mission editor) as the original creator of this post suggested

Giving options to people how and what they want to implement, so it is kind of hard to see why it does bother you a lot.

You misunderstand me. You can say that you don't understand at all. Apparently, it's really about the language barrier. It's better to leave this argument.
I just repeat that I am against simplifications in modules that are not related to Flaming Cliffs 3.

[draconus]

1 hour ago, Ramius007 said:

Tomcat without Aim-54

Why not? It was flying with Phoenix from the start in the 70s.

3 hours ago, swartbyron said:

I feel lost, confused and helpless with this new SPO-15  

Sorry you feel that way but here's reality kicking you hard. Haven't you expect this to happen? Didn't you read the thread:

A lot of things work differently. Rules of the game have changed. Either adapt and learn it or keep flying FC3 verison but you can't expect to have good results when flying the aircraft in missions that are simply not suitable for this airframe - trying to force it as SEAD or BVR machine vs Fox 3 is just tormenting yourself.

[Ramius007]

I wonder if F-35 drop, we get thread like: "allow F-35 to be visible on radars" becouse stealth gives unfair adventage on servers, and is not balanced, just a little realism option, what's wrong with this?

[AeriaGloria]

46 minutes ago, Ramius007 said:

I wonder if F-35 drop, we get thread like: "allow F-35 to be visible on radars" becouse stealth gives unfair adventage on servers, and is not balanced, just a little realism option, what's wrong with this?

I’m sure there will be a luneberg lens option

[Ramius007]

25 minutes ago, AeriaGloria said:

I’m sure there will be a luneberg lens option

Elegant solution!

[Mainstay]

18 hours ago, Ramius007 said:

I dont think that this "video game" designers, have to bow to small minority of arcade pvp servers participants, and balance modules around arcade style servers. For many people, only thing that DCS have going for them is realism, if you remove it, you can fly FC modules, free DCS mods or other game forever, there will be no diffrence with FF modules made in a way you like them to see. Issue is not realistic Fulcrum, but enviroment made by pvp server admins, that is balanced around assymetrical early XXI centaury conflicts, and made for majority of XXI centaury jets, and people who belive that Sparrow=CW. When they get actual CW technology they are shocked. This version of Fulcrum should compete vs F1, F-4, 530D less M2k, Tomcat without Aim-54, and all CW Fox-2 only fighters, and a lot of helos and attack planes, still plenty of platforms to choose from, and potential for great REAL CW server, where FF Fulcrum would be top of the food chain, yet difficult to master plane.

Get off your high horse sir and stop pretending your the chosen pilot to lead the pack! 

People are simply asking ED to come up with a middle way that suits everyones "Happy" GAME experience. 

 

[Ramius007]

59 minutes ago, Mainstay said:

Get off your high horse sir and stop pretending your the chosen pilot to lead the pack! 

People are simply asking ED to come up with a middle way that suits everyones "Happy" GAME experience. 

 

Except, that it's not middle way, it's just "realism on" or "realism of" setting. It's same middle way that man and his dog on avarage have 3 legs. Solution is not change realism, but to change enviroment. We will be in same spot with F-100, F-104, Mig-17, and then EF, F-35 and non announced Rafale. People will be asking to adjust them to fit pseudo Fox-1 servers, instead of making one that suit those planes. Like add fictional chaff/flares dispansers on first 3, and/or disable some features of most avanced jets.