Scientist Built a Home Made Magnetic Generator 24 KW Free Home Electricity

[Guest drondrik]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w8TJlQlPi4s

from the article: ... A magnetic power generator is basically a Free Energy Generator. It uses magnets, and magnetic force to induce l motion. It runs by itself, indefinitely without stopping, thus creating completely free electrical energy...

--------------------------------

comment from youtube; Yes possible and works...working magnetic generator uses TWO batteries - one is to help disk with magnets to keep running and another to store energy and recharge the 1st battery. 100 % working scheme..no magic at all

[GGTharos]

This should be your reaction to any claim of 'free energy':

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w1t0I7OQAWw

[Pilotasso]

Its a farce. An old one and not original by a long shot. There are thousands of self perpectual generator patents but they are all hoaxes. Theres a thing called counter electro force that oposes the generator motion. Its impossible to crate energy from nothing.

[kaiserb_uk]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perpetual_motion

 

What a surprise - you too can build your own and the kit only costs a very reasonable $47! Who'd have thunk?

 

"Remember, the information described in this guide is TOP SECRET! I’m not sure when another opportunity to slash your energy bill by up to $36,000 in the next 10 years and get paid by your energy company will be released againn. The CIA has made sure this information has been suppressed for over 30 years and could easily cover it up for the next 30 years. So, Act Now!"

 

Priceless! Curse the CIA, trying to keep us in the dark ages.

Edited August 31, 2009 by kaiserb_uk

[asparagin]

News Update!!

 

Sky News reports that scientists were able to use the magnetic power generator and supply a pc. FPS boost of 40% playing a game called "Locks on" (on a crowded map) was detected.

[joey45]

Nothing to do with the limitations of the game engines then.

[A.S]

http://peswiki.com/energy/Main_Page

 

 

Im also very amused to see those dogma fixated modern scientists suprised of things they cant "theorise" :smilewink: but its good to see, that more and more high level science steps forward in regions beyond

previous convictions... ( publically, not to forget ;) )

Edited September 1, 2009 by A.S

[CyBerkut]

News Update!!

 

Sky News reports that scientists were able to use the magnetic power generator and supply a pc. FPS boost of 40% playing a game called "Locks on" (on a crowded map) was detected.

 

Ah yes, that['s what our computers need... good magnets! Be sure to get the magnets especially close to the hard drives so that they spin faster (for better transfer rates, doncha' know!).

[GGTharos]

There's a huge difference between a solar cooker and 'free' energy. ;)

Free energy doesn't exist - you can't create or destroy it, period. Nothing has ever broken that basic principle of physics.

 

I'm very amused to see that you can't tell the difference. ;)

 

http://peswiki.com/energy/Main_Page

 

 

Im also very amused to see those dogma fixated modern scientists suprised of things they cant "theorise" :smilewink: but its good to see, that more and more high level science steps forward in regions beyond

previous convictions... ( publically, not to forget ;) )

[A.S]

There's a huge difference between a solar cooker and 'free' energy. ;)

Free energy doesn't exist - you can't create or destroy it, period. Nothing has ever broken that basic principle of physics.

 

I'm very amused to see that you can't tell the difference. ;)

 

And you study quantum physics? me lolz ..go learn again (I used to use that old prayers too....in school days :P, besides that BOLD line is a contradiction of "creation" itself, furthermore due to the lack of the definition of energy itself, commonly as such understood and teached )

Remind you, mathematical framwork to explain phenomons are not always pure immutable laws capturing the whole depth. As you also know there are still things unexplainable, at least in published establishment), but yet, we have extraordinary phenomons appearing beyond conventional explanations, leading to conclusions that we have to rework our golden "prayers".

 

( be carefull with the word "free", because objectivly observed....energy is always there and free ;), and creativity is not repeating the dogmas of your teachers...)

 

There are many fields and experts out there, what would revolution your and mine normal "wisdom"....i save picking them out for you....once you ask...you will discover yourself.

Edited September 2, 2009 by A.S

[GGTharos]

AS, that was one huge fail on your part.

 

Since you are incapable of understand the statement you yourself bolded, and call it a contradiction, you have shown yourself incapable of understanding the fundamentals of physics.

Your last statement is also nothing but wise-crackery.

 

Sorry, but ... F.

Edited September 2, 2009 by GGTharos

[A.S]

AS, that was one huge fail on your part.

 

Since you are incapable of understand the statement you yourself bolded, and call it a contradiction, you have shown yourself incapable of understanding the fundamentals of physics.

Your last statement is also nothing but wise-crackery.

 

Sorry, but ... F.

 

Dude, every school-kid learns that BOLD line.......and surely im aware of that law..... YET ...i disagree !!

 

confused now?......nothing else expected......if you leave the box ....ask again

[GGTharos]

I'm not confused. You're simply wrong. :)

 

In other words, you lack understanding because you lack knowledge :)

 

 

Come talk to me when you get a clue. Right now all you have is a lot of faith in snake oil.

[A.S]

I'm not confused. You're simply wrong. :)

 

In other words, you lack understanding because you lack knowledge :)

 

I havent expected you to understand or even trying to understand it.

Your background is backed up by things you dont dare to question.

You repeat "knowledge" as letters as i also learnt them in time...or could just re-read them....that kind of knowledge is pffft

You disagree with me, becuase your professor told you=?...or you because you havent seen anything else proofing the opposite?....yes i know...that´s why you answer that way .....logically....in your understanding ..it makes sense.

(I have more understanding in math and physics then you guess...btw)

 

KILL TIME

Edited September 2, 2009 by A.S

[GGTharos]

I'm sorry, why did you assume that I disagree with you just because I've been told to?

 

I happen to know how the physics work here, and I happen to know you're wrong - you know, with the help of formal proofs and other tools ... unlike you who read something somewhere and decided to 'question the party line because it's cool'. You're the fool here, not me ;)

 

Go ahead, present a SINGLE argument for your little fantasy. Go ahead and attempt to prove what countless people have attempted to, and failed miserably, because MOTHER NATURE, not some textbook, prevented them from doing so.

[A.S]

I'm sorry, why did you assume that I disagree with you just because I've been told to?

 

I happen to know how the physics work here, and I happen to know you're wrong - you know, with the help of formal proofs and other tools ... unlike you who read something somewhere and decided to 'question the party line because it's cool'. You're the fool here, not me ;)

 

Go ahead, present a SINGLE argument for your little fantasy. Go ahead and attempt to prove what countless people have attempted to, and failed miserably, because MOTHER NATURE, not some textbook, prevented them from doing so.

 

Fool hah? ok then...next time you meet your professors...ask them...if there could be any circumstance, where your "you cant create or kill energy, just transform" blaa blaa (god how often i have been told same shit in school) could be wrong.....just ask him, or look it up in few classes higher.....then come back calling someone fool. Fool is someone with 2 eyes, 2 ears, 1 mouth but no phantasie....:megalol:

 

KILL TIME part 2

[RvEYoda]

Well there is a problem there.

The "higher classes" probably abstract things simply out of

you cant create or kill energy, just transform. So it is the main

point the classes start out of. How do disprove our definition

by theory based on it? ;).

We cannot.

 

you cant create or kill energy, just transform - may be false?

I dont know. But certainly every single device seen and produced in the

world so far has worked according to it.

 

Just means it is a good model so far :P.

I dont think you can actually prove an empiric law...(it is one right?).

 

but...go ahead. you can try to finda working solution for it. I dont know .

If you make it you are rich, but so far everybody failed

Edited September 2, 2009 by =RvE=Yoda

[A.S]

I know yoda..... im just trying to discuss with that GG man...he also should know that im not totally nutcase here.....

 

But alot research and interest and also a bit my own conclusions lead me to that fact, that that so well known law is not always consistent...cant be....

 

whatever....only idiots like einstein would go ahead and question time :music_whistling:

[GGTharos]

Show me how your fantasy predicts physical events. :)

 

Because that is what sets science apart from fantasy ... science is the testing of a hypothesis - you can attempt to prove it directly or indirectly. It has little to do with imagination in the sense you're trying to portray.

 

The only one going bla bla bla here is you. You have been wrong, you still are wrong, and you will be wrong - but it must be fun living in your own delusion. ;)

 

 

I suppose Yoda put it very succintly above though, what we have is a model. You still just have your fantasy.

 

Fool hah? ok then...next time you meet your professors...ask them...if there could be any circumstance, where your "you cant create or kill energy, just transform" blaa blaa (god how often i have been told same shit in school) could be wrong.....just ask him, or look it up in few classes higher.....then come back calling someone fool. Fool is someone with 2 eyes, 2 ears, 1 mouth but no phantasie....:megalol:

 

KILL TIME part 2

[RvEYoda]

I know yoda..... im just trying to discuss with that GG man...he also should know that im not totally nutcase here.....

 

But alot research and interest and also a bit my own conclusions lead me to that fact, that that so well known law is not always consistent...cant be....

 

whatever....onyl idiots like einstein go ahead and question time :music_whistling:

 

 

Try putting in full sentences and less "....." in your posts AS ;P.

I have to read each post about 5 times to understand it.

 

I'm not defending either side here, but I belive

that energy is not destroyed. Not because of some law - no.

 

I believe so because I have my own definition of energy

[A.S]

If energy cant be created or destroyed ( at least in all to us known applications and calculations, excluding the other possibilities of its dis- or/and apperance in other "dimensions" - so i shoud be allowed to call it -)..

 

how can "existence itself" of anything INCLUDIND energy, what defines most fields by itself already, come into being in first place?

 

that simple question shows me, even i cant explain it also, that THERE MUST BE more then we use to preach to others calling them fools. :smilewink:

Edited September 2, 2009 by A.S

[A.S]

I believe so because I have my own definition of energy

 

shoot :D, i promise i will not use "fool" as others...no matter how wild it is

 

..oh btw...the secret of universe supposed to be 7129/6105195

 

 

I think John Searl, Ed Leedskalnin and Tesla touched a very interesting Perspective so to say...even not being able to fully explain it...but clearly showing...it shouldnt work, but it does.

 

That reminds me school days...

 

Theory: All know how, but it doesnt work.

Practise: It works, noone knows why.

 

hahahaa :lol:

Edited September 2, 2009 by A.S

[RvEYoda]

If energy cant be created or destroyed ( at least in all to us known applications and calculations, excluding the other possibilities of its dis- or/and apperance in other "dimensions" - so i shoud be allowed to call it -)..

 

how can "existence itself" of anything INCLUDIND energy, what defines most fields by itself already, come into being in first place?

 

that simple question shows me, even i cant explain it also, that THERE MUST BE more then we use to preach to others calling them fools. :smilewink:

 

There is a list of "god proofs" which includes this question and others.

 

My answer is. Why do you assume things must have a beginning or end?

Having a beginning or end imo is just a human simplification of a continous situation,

Q ph guys call it a collapse of wavefunctions.

[GGTharos]

Here's your mistake:

 

We don't know where the universe came from.

We just know the laws it is governed by.

 

Your question is a question of origins in disguise. There is no real answer, though there are several theories. None of them indulge this free energy fantasy though - work is the flow of energy (or transformation of energy) along the dimension of time. The amount of energy, assuming you could trap it such that none of it may escape (but then you wouldn't be able to observe your own experiment) always remains constant.

 

This should tell you a couple things: Perpetual motion machines can only run in an unobserved environment (ie you would never observe it doing any work) or they are not perpetual motion machines.

 

Anything that does work transforms energy, and this quantity of energy remains known and unchanged. This is simply a fact of nature which is also reflected in the physics model currently known.

 

Energy is the universe's measuring tape, or weight scale if you will. It is the very substance of existance, and the very means of interacting with spacetime.

 

You can ask where it comes from all you want, but the fact still remains ... there's no such thing as a zero-point energy generator, and there won't be. Just because there's some residual energy left in the particle itself, doesn't mean it is accessible to you - unless you destroy the particle, and then it's gone, because that residual energy is the particle itself.

 

The sooner you wrap your head around this, the sooner you'll figure out why this free energy (free as in comes from nowhere, not as in you don't have to pay for it) bollocks is bollocks.

 

I suggest that you think about it, instead of spouting off to others about closing their minds. ;)

 

If energy cant be created or destroyed ( at least in all to us known applications and calculations, excluding the other possibilities of its dis- or/and apperance in other "dimensions" - so i shoud be allowed to call it -)..

 

how can "existence" of anything INCLUDIND energy, what defines most fields by itself already, come into being in first place?

 

that simple question shows me, even i cant explain it also, that THERE MUST BE more then we use to preach to others calling them fools. :smilewink:

[A.S]

i cant yoda.....from my stomick i tend to believe as long time being there is a beginning and a end of things....even if that wouldnt even include totall disappearance of excitence....

 

all i know is this....the only constant (beside the cosmic constants, which are mysterious already themself) is change.