Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi all,

 

I've been silently watching this board for over a year. Today I decide it's time to kick start and I got my CAD draw finished.

 

My pit project is simple:

- An ACES II seat with side table for TM Cougar

- Ability to use with TM Warthog (center stick placeholder)

- 12mm flat board only (with 30x30mm column for reinforcement), no curve for easy build

- Parachute container to be build with paper, again, easy build

- No need to be 100% size accurate

- Spare space used as storage area

 

 

I do need some help on size check. Although I'm not aiming for 100% size accurate, I do still like to have it "similar" to actual size. Therefore if you saw any size is way off, please lemme know.

 

splantop.jpg splanback.jpg

 

Any help would be very welcome.

 

 

CAD is draw with Google Sketchup, with refer to lots of photos, 1:48 model, HowToAceII.pdf. Total time is about 4hrs planning, 8hrs drawing, over a year watching this board...;ppp

Posted

Excellent job mate..!

It's strange, but you'll get a much better feeling of immersion just from being seated in a chair like this.. I promise you..!

 

I would maybe tr to curve the back just a little. Or at least use padding that does this for you.. And I'm talking from my own back-aching experience.. LoL.

"But (504)Brewber said they were'nt friendly.. So I took'em out.!"

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Posted

I take Triggerhappy's advice, make the back simple curved...:)

 

Also add central stick mount for TM Warthog, assuming that it's d=110mm, 62x62mm square placement for screw. All gear tables are in yellow, and paper parts are in blue.

 

Now I need to finish the size checking, then I can get boards cutted in about 1month time...:)

 

view1e.jpg view2.jpg

Posted

Hi !

This thing looks great !

 

Finally someone who thinks like me...

Yet, here two things that "jumped" to my eyes...

 

I would consider removing the upper edges of the seat (as Im convinced they will not "get along" with my legs. and I'm pretty fit...) marked on edited picture with no.1

 

I don't really understand what is the angle marked with question mark no.2

 

It look's like it's too small. and more than It will not be the most comfy to sit at, it may cause some back problems... I would go on,say +95 degrees ...

(if you can place two plates over some sort of a jig you could find the best angle that will suit you and apply it on the design...)

 

Sure it's only my opinion.

 

Better safe than sorry...

view2.jpg.5b66a2191e798365ed424a0c138ec4a6.jpg

Nir Bar

"Schredder"

 

"In the warrior code there's no surrender,

though his body says stop,his spirit cries...

NEVER !!!"

Posted

The upper edges are from the original AcesII plans. Also, angle number 2 that you had a question about--I'm pretty sure it is not 90 degrees, as pilots are sort of laid back a bit, sort of like space shuttle pilots--but not to that extreme. Some brainiacs over the past 60 years figured out that is the "best" sitting position, at least for fighters? Would be interested to hear other's ideas on this--

 

BTW--TT--you've inspired me--I'm doing a very similar pit. Thanks for sharing!

 

Hi !

This thing looks great !

 

Finally someone who thinks like me...

Yet, here two things that "jumped" to my eyes...

 

I would consider removing the upper edges of the seat (as Im convinced they will not "get along" with my legs. and I'm pretty fit...) marked on edited picture with no.1

 

I don't really understand what is the angle marked with question mark no.2

 

It look's like it's too small. and more than It will not be the most comfy to sit at, it may cause some back problems... I would go on,say +95 degrees ...

(if you can place two plates over some sort of a jig you could find the best angle that will suit you and apply it on the design...)

 

Sure it's only my opinion.

 

Better safe than sorry...

Posted

Latest progress, added head-rest, purple color parts, plan to made in foam

new3q.jpg

 

The rear side of back rack, is laid 18deg. The seat, is kickup 18deg

So, yes, the cross-angle is 90deg on the back/seat corner. But you actually seat at 18deg back, not 90deg upright to horizontal plane.

 

A cutoff, hopefully explain better

new4k.jpg

Posted

Thanks Deadman, yes I aware A-10/F-15 is 15deg, F-16 is 30deg :)

 

But it looks like for A-10/F-15, the seat is actually install 3~4deg nose down, makes the back 15deg angle, and F-16 is install with 12deg kickup, make the back 30deg angle, am I right?

 

For me, I want the sideline of seat bulkhead to be horizontal, so my back is actually 18deg, not 15deg (which would make seat sideline 3deg nose down) ..:)

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...