Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Here's an excerpt from the manual:

p44. "As with the fuselage tanks, the tanks are self-sealing and filled with a flexible foam to prevent a fuel tank explosion. Note that the external tanks do not have such precautions and are never flown with in combat."

 

Is this modelled in game? e.g. When flying in a combat area with external tanks and taking hits to those tanks, will you risk a fuel tank explosion?

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

 

Asus Z390-E, 32GB Crucial Ballistix 2400Mhz, Intel i7 9700K 5.0Ghz, Asus GTX1080 8GB, SoundBlaster AE-5, G15, Streamdeck, DSD Flight, TM Warthog, VirPil BRD, MFG Crosswind CAM5, TrackIR 5, KW-908 Jetseat, Win 10 64-bit

 

”Pilots do not get paid for what they do daily, but they get paid for what they are capable of doing.

However, if pilots would need to do daily what they are capable of doing, nobody would dare to fly anymore.”

Posted

Well it's not supposed to happen. That's something different.

There's nothing preventing me from flying with external tanks to a hot zone. I won't bump into an invisible wall in the sky or insta-stall. ;)

 

So the question remains valid, doesn't it? ;)

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

 

Asus Z390-E, 32GB Crucial Ballistix 2400Mhz, Intel i7 9700K 5.0Ghz, Asus GTX1080 8GB, SoundBlaster AE-5, G15, Streamdeck, DSD Flight, TM Warthog, VirPil BRD, MFG Crosswind CAM5, TrackIR 5, KW-908 Jetseat, Win 10 64-bit

 

”Pilots do not get paid for what they do daily, but they get paid for what they are capable of doing.

However, if pilots would need to do daily what they are capable of doing, nobody would dare to fly anymore.”

Posted

I don't get this bit. The F-16 tanks aren't particularly survivable either, but we'd bring them along in Falcon all the time and punch them off when an enemy got to engagement range.

Posted
I don't get this bit. The F-16 tanks aren't particularly survivable either, but we'd bring them along in Falcon all the time and punch them off when an enemy got to engagement range.

 

Well, is not the fuel you have to worry the most is the fumes. Anyway. F-16 has a different fire suppression idea. We use Halon, which will suppress fire even on the external tanks.

 

http://pdf.aiaa.org/preview/1981/PV1981_1638.pdf

To whom it may concern,

I am an idiot, unfortunately for the world, I have a internet connection and a fondness for beer....apologies for that.

Thank you for you patience.

 

 

Many people don't want the truth, they want constant reassurance that whatever misconception/fallacies they believe in are true..

Posted
Why model something that won't happen? :)

 

 

Why would you fly it in combat anyway? you lose all your belly stations with it loaded and the extra weight would probably mean less muns. Alos IRC this was made as a trainer for the guard correct? So thats why its modeled

 

 

 

Posted

Like what Gearbox said about dropping the external tanks when entering combat. Most external tanks are built to be retreivable and also refered to as "Drop Tanks". It was more-so on the prop fighters so they could go the distance on externals, drop, fight, then RTB(or other location). But having those tanks on creates extra drag which would be the last thing you want if you get engaged and need to avoid something/someone on your tail.

 

With the A10(any) it's already flying tank as is, anything to reduce that drag and allow less resistance and be abit more agile helps.

 

Besides, the last thing I would want to do is bring those fuel tanks into a combat situation incase a highpowered round does strike the tank and create an explosion of any sort. Any less hazard is a pilots best hope.

Posted
I don't get this bit. The F-16 tanks aren't particularly survivable either, but we'd bring them along in Falcon all the time and punch them off when an enemy got to engagement range.

 

Well, is not the fuel you have to worry the most is the fumes. Anyway. F-16 has a different fire suppression idea. We use Halon, which will suppress fire even on the external tanks.

 

http://pdf.aiaa.org/preview/1981/PV1981_1638.pdf

 

Also, by the time a 16 gets into battle the ext tanks should be empty anyway. External tank transfer first on the F-16, unlike the F15, but that's a different story.

i7-4820k @ 3.7, Windows 7 64-bit, 16GB 1866mhz EVGA GTX 970 2GB, 256GB SSD, 500GB WD, TM Warthog, TM Cougar MFD's, Saitek Combat Pedals, TrackIR 5, G15 keyboard, 55" 4K LED

 

Posted
Like what Gearbox said about dropping the external tanks when entering combat. Most external tanks are built to be retreivable and also refered to as "Drop Tanks". It was more-so on the prop fighters so they could go the distance on externals, drop, fight, then RTB(or other location). But having those tanks on creates extra drag which would be the last thing you want if you get engaged and need to avoid something/someone on your tail.

 

With the A10(any) it's already flying tank as is, anything to reduce that drag and allow less resistance and be abit more agile helps.

 

Besides, the last thing I would want to do is bring those fuel tanks into a combat situation incase a highpowered round does strike the tank and create an explosion of any sort. Any less hazard is a pilots best hope.

 

Retrievable....in what sense?...maybe back in the day that's what they had in mind. Every ext tank I have seen that was "dropped" off a jet was not usable again. I'll see if I can get some pics of one, I think we have one sitting in our tank yard.

i7-4820k @ 3.7, Windows 7 64-bit, 16GB 1866mhz EVGA GTX 970 2GB, 256GB SSD, 500GB WD, TM Warthog, TM Cougar MFD's, Saitek Combat Pedals, TrackIR 5, G15 keyboard, 55" 4K LED

 

Posted

Guys we're missing the point here ;) : The question was wether it was modelled or not.

 

I understand the sillyness of doing something you're not supposed to do, but if everyone in the world only did what they are supposed to do they were no accidents at all, ever.

 

I am curious, seperate from the whole discussion about wether it would be wise to do so, if the sim actually models the difference in fuel tanks.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

 

Asus Z390-E, 32GB Crucial Ballistix 2400Mhz, Intel i7 9700K 5.0Ghz, Asus GTX1080 8GB, SoundBlaster AE-5, G15, Streamdeck, DSD Flight, TM Warthog, VirPil BRD, MFG Crosswind CAM5, TrackIR 5, KW-908 Jetseat, Win 10 64-bit

 

”Pilots do not get paid for what they do daily, but they get paid for what they are capable of doing.

However, if pilots would need to do daily what they are capable of doing, nobody would dare to fly anymore.”

Posted
Guys we're missing the point here ;) : The question was wether it was modelled or not.

 

I understand the sillyness of doing something you're not supposed to do, but if everyone in the world only did what they are supposed to do they were no accidents at all, ever.

 

I am curious, seperate from the whole discussion about wether it would be wise to do so, if the sim actually models the difference in fuel tanks.

 

Why don't you try it out? Don't hold your breath if you are hoping to get an answer from a dev, i think they spend their time elswhere atm. ;)

Good, fast, cheap. Choose any two.

Come let's eat grandpa!

Use punctuation, save lives!

Posted

How would you try it out? There is no way to see if a hit to your plane was registered on a fuel tank. For all we know its not even modelled and you fly until the end of time with those tanks without anything happening.

You would keep on wondering wether it was being hit or not and a) its not modelled so the explosion stays out or b) it was not hit at all.

 

Its not something that's easy 'to try out'. ;)

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

 

Asus Z390-E, 32GB Crucial Ballistix 2400Mhz, Intel i7 9700K 5.0Ghz, Asus GTX1080 8GB, SoundBlaster AE-5, G15, Streamdeck, DSD Flight, TM Warthog, VirPil BRD, MFG Crosswind CAM5, TrackIR 5, KW-908 Jetseat, Win 10 64-bit

 

”Pilots do not get paid for what they do daily, but they get paid for what they are capable of doing.

However, if pilots would need to do daily what they are capable of doing, nobody would dare to fly anymore.”

Posted

Its not something that's easy 'to try out'. ;)

 

Set up an AI flight of A-10s and put some 30mm peas in those tanks. Should be doable.

Good, fast, cheap. Choose any two.

Come let's eat grandpa!

Use punctuation, save lives!

Posted

Are these reusable?

 

F-16 centerline 300gal tank

IMG_1877%20%28Medium%29.JPG

 

Another view

IMG_1876%20%28Medium%29.JPG

 

 

Center section of a 370gal tank

IMG_1878%20%28Medium%29.JPG

 

Tail section of a 370gal tank F-16

IMG_1879%20%28Medium%29.JPG

i7-4820k @ 3.7, Windows 7 64-bit, 16GB 1866mhz EVGA GTX 970 2GB, 256GB SSD, 500GB WD, TM Warthog, TM Cougar MFD's, Saitek Combat Pedals, TrackIR 5, G15 keyboard, 55" 4K LED

 

Posted
Are these reusable?
Of course they are. As scrap, of course.

I only respond to that little mechanical voice that says "Terrain! Terrain! Pull Up! Pull Up!"

 

Who can say what is impossible, for the dream of yesterday is the hope of today and the reality of tomorrow.

-Robert Goddard

 

"A hybrid. A car for enthusiasts of armpit hair and brown rice." -Jeremy Clarkson

 

"I swear by my pretty floral bonet, I will end you." -Mal from Firefly

Posted

LMAO, anything and everything is reusable then.

i7-4820k @ 3.7, Windows 7 64-bit, 16GB 1866mhz EVGA GTX 970 2GB, 256GB SSD, 500GB WD, TM Warthog, TM Cougar MFD's, Saitek Combat Pedals, TrackIR 5, G15 keyboard, 55" 4K LED

 

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...