New missile mod for FC 2.0

[SESova]

ED team always say thay have documents from real life,and lock on is based on them.We would like to see that documents,charts and math.calculations.

[SESova]

THere are some servers out there that get good numbers. I think it is also a problem for stability of the DCSW client. Remember, a lot of people have moved onto DCSW. You guys are still talking about FC2 right?

 

With purpose.

You cant do changes at FC3.To have FC 3 server,you need ED approval.If you do something thay dont like it,no approval.Dictatorship.

In FC 2 you have freedom to act.And why to do for FC 3.What is different at FC3? F15 skin?And to pay more for that?

[Jona33]

With purpose.

You cant do changes at FC3.To have FC 3 server,you need ED approval.If you do something thay dont like it,no approval.Dictatorship.

In FC 2 you have freedom to act.And why to do for FC 3.What is different at FC3? F15 skin?And to pay more for that?

 

What are you on about? Or on for that matter?

[SESova]

What are you on about? Or on for that matter?

 

We want to do the Lock on at right way.It is to good and beautifull to be wasted becouse off someones opinion.

We want players back.

We want reality as much as possible.

We are going to fight for it.ED also would get a lot off money fot that,but somehow thay dont see that,or thay are forbiden to see.

[Jona33]

We want to do the Lock on at right way.It is to good and beautifull to be wasted becouse off someones opinion.

Yet your thread is based on "some guy's" opinion

 

We want players back.

And making yourself look stupid doesn't accomplish that.

 

We want reality as much as possible.

Then don't believe Bullsh*t

 

We are going to fight for it.ED also would get a lot off money fot that,but somehow thay dont see that,or thay are forbiden to see.

 

You're trying (fruitlessly) to change a game. Not inspire an uprising against ED.

[SESova]

Yet your thread is based on "some guy's" opinion

 

 

And making yourself look stupid doesn't accomplish that.

 

 

Then don't believe Bullsh*t

 

 

 

You're trying (fruitlessly) to change a game. Not inspire an uprising against ED.

 

He he he,you are realy ready to do and say enything for 40 USD worth game.That kind off people we are traing to put in the line.No more Capos like in Auschvic.Sorry,you losing the game.

[Jona33]

The fact you can't come up with a related answer... well. That's poor.

 

Also, going by your sentence your trying to put people who can think on a line? What type, railway line, front line, helpline? :D Also what is "capos" and "Auschvic".

Edited February 10, 2013 by Jona33

[SESova]

The fact you can't come up with a related answer... well. That's poor.

 

Also, going by your sentence your trying to put people who can think on a line? What type, railway line, front line, helpline? :D Also what is "capos" and "Auschvic".

 

We thrying to put in the line people who dont think,wich rather listen and dont like or cant think.That way thay wont make problems the others who can do something.

[Krebs20]

Are you just trolling now?

 

With purpose.

You cant do changes at FC3.To have FC 3 server,you need ED approval.If you do something thay dont like it,no approval.Dictatorship.

 

What are you talking about?

 

DCS world (FC3) is extremely flexible. You can change just about anything. I've seen ka50s flying with hellfires, Su with r77s, every aircraft in the game flyable. What can't I do in FC3? Name one thing I cannot do?

 

ANYONE can host FC3. If you lack the knowlege to do so, that's your problem. If your angry about unstable connections in 1.2.2, so is the testing team. It's being worked on to make it better than your glory days.

 

What dictatorship? Your so far into left field I starting to think your trying to be a troll.

[Boberro]

You mean on that same crippled ecm with 10-15sec delay which was inserted into the game in purpose only to allow the F-15 undisturbed TWS missile guidance.:doh:

 

I thing problem is yours man.Why do you think only US inwest the money in the weapons?Thay told you so?

If is just the game,and it is not important,why only one side is intentionally degraded? With purpose or...?If you clame it is a game,and cant be so real,why Ed team clame it is?If is so bad why we have to pay for that?

 

Most countries invest money in militarism. But US has been doing it for long years and XXXX more intensive than Russia.

That gives big gap between Russian and US equipment.

 

I sugest challange for all proud ED testers.

Lets organize dedicated server with FC 2+ragnarok mod,and other with FC 3 or FC 2 with no mod.

Lets see who is going to be winer.

Of course,you wont do that at eny cost.In that situation,nobody would not by FC 3.

 

What would be the condition of winning? More populated server? If so don't be silly.

 

Russian technology not depends much of the invested money, but from a quality and educated scientists depends very much. University graduates have much more in Russia than in the U.S.

Russian scientist may be because of the money to go to America to make a cooker, but when you need to make weapons, he remains in his Russia.

It takes many years of poverty for the destruction of education. USA is today's science center in the world, but Russia is a scientific pearl today.

 

This is why we see all the time Russian discoveries. Russian new, amazing technologies. This is why we see Russian first stealth prototype 20 years after US, and this is why we see only 1 ship so called "carrier". This is why we see almost same Bulava missile fails and ambitious plans to modernize army.... next ambitious plan because previous one, great one failed again.

 

We are not interested to do missiles to be good or bad.Mod is madeed that missiles become as thay are and as thay shud be,and closer to the real world as much as possibe with this "construction" of the Lock on.Totally accidentaly result US-Russia is more less equal.In my opinion it is graet stuff.

So is it now R 77 bad or good,we are not interested much.It is based on the information from real life,and thats the way it is.If somebody dont like new R 77,it is his problem.

 

LOL good joke :D Closer to the real world based on encyclopedia and perhaps wikipedia :D

[Jona33]

We thrying to put in the line people who dont think,wich rather listen and dont like or cant think.That way thay wont make problems the others who can do something.

 

What is "the line"

[squinkys]

During pass 2 years we have provide a lots of tracks,videos...no use enymore.Diplomacy and science didnt give results agains propaganda and interests.Now,we are starting to act.

 

Oh boy, the SE guys are acting out!

 

Honestly, all these ridiculous postings are doing nothing more than making me never want to fly with this group of people. You're the one spewing propaganda buddy. And your laughable notion of "balancing" the game? I fly DCS because it's the closest thing to reality, not some HAWX-esque "sim." You're unwilling to post the track because it's going to contradict with what you're saying.

 

Someone pass the popcorn, this has been entertaining.

[104th_Maverick]

And your laughable notion of "balancing" the game? I fly DCS because it's the closest thing to reality, not some HAWX-esque "sim."

 

 

This comedy is not lost on me either, I'm sure with some quick searching I can come up with a good number of threads where =SE= have accused F-15 drivers of being 'HAWX' wannabe's or saying certain people should go and play HAWX because of the way they fly in the F-15.

 

Pretty ironic that they are now pushing a mod that balances missiles so everyone has a 'fair' chance...... sounds like...... Hawx :music_whistling:

 

I sugest challange for all proud ED testers.

 

 

Yeah I was well up for it actually, until I watched this video ....

 

 

Now I'm just plain terrified! So.... not so much

Edited February 10, 2013 by [Maverick]

[SESova]

;1672392']This comedy is not lost on me either, I'm sure with some quick searching I can come up with a good number of threads where =SE= have accused F-15 drivers of being 'HAWX' wannabe's or saying certain people should go and play HAWX because of the way they fly in the F-15.

 

Pretty ironic that they are now pushing a mod that balances missiles so everyone has a 'fair' chance...... sounds like...... Hawx :music_whistling:

 

 

 

 

Yeah I was well up for it actually, until I watched this video ....

 

 

Now I'm just plain terrified! So.... not so much

 

LOL,video is done by original Lock on,FC2,not with Ragnaroks mod.

Edited February 10, 2013 by =SE=Sova

[SEwhiteG]

LOL,video is done by original Lock on,FC2,not with Ragnaroks mod.

 

Yup this show only that they just talking without checking......

[SESova]

Maverik,in your opinion,if we fly at 10 000 meters altitude,face to face,1 000 km/h,and whole the time we dont change course,speed and altitude.What is the maximum range of AIM 120C in this conditions?

[159th_Viper]

Maverik,in your opinion,if we fly at 10 000 meters altitude,face to face,1 000 km/h,and whole the time we dont change course,speed and altitude.What is the maximum range of AIM 120C in this conditions?

 

By Gawd you guys crack me up :music_whistling:

 

You have been told that all missiles are a W.I.P. at present. Yet here you are arguing about who knows what (personally have no idea due to all the BS cluttering this thread). Why not wait till modelling is complete before arguing the odds?

 

It's not rocket science, or is it........:megalol:

[Krebs20]

Sova, I am calling you out as a troll. Can you respond to my last post?

[SEwhiteG]

Maverik,in your opinion,if we fly at 10 000 meters altitude,face to face,1 000 km/h,and whole the time we dont change course,speed and altitude.What is the maximum range of AIM 120C in this conditions?

Good one, but this should be question for all others because they are acting like they know everything.

[SESova]

Sova, I am calling you out as a troll. Can you respond to my last post?

 

My translator cant translate correctly your post.

What does it mean troll?

If post is not abouth mod and missile possibilities in the mod,i am not much interested to answer.

[SESova]

Maverik,in your opinion,if we fly at 10 000 meters altitude,face to face,1 000 km/h,and whole the time we dont change course,speed and altitude.What is the maximum range of AIM 120C in this conditions?

 

Still no answer,why do you need so much time?You are the testers,come on.

[Pilotasso]

nice roles reversal, but still you havent made a single valid point to the whole matter.

[Krebs20]

Sova, you went off topic and claimed many evil bad things. I called you out. Now you refuse to answer for your rant because its off topic. You are a hypocrite troll now.

[Teknetinium]

I guise those who don't want to fly whit this mod don't have to. Its not a good development but that's what happens if big group of people don't agree whit EDs realism assumptions. Lets wait for final release of FC3 and then judge missiles performance and how it effect the the simulator.

[zerver]

This is why we see all the time Russian discoveries. Russian new, amazing technologies. This is why we see Russian first stealth prototype 20 years after US, and this is why we see only 1 ship so called "carrier". This is why we see almost same Bulava missile fails and ambitious plans to modernize army.... next ambitious plan because previous one, great one failed again.

You are comparing military technology of two countries (which every one have different approach to military itself) by amount of aircraft carriers currently in service or stealth planes technology? Way to go.

 

 

As for 120s, or 77s. I think all was already said.

You guys really need some reality check. AMRAAM development started in mid 70`s, and 77`s few years later. The only problem is, that USSR collapsed in 91, following massive economic crisis in Russia in early 90`s. Nobody even thought about further developing of new air to air missiles at that time and it was put into service “as is”, so it was a little bit “delayed” compared to US program.

 

 

Before you make any more “mods”, can you please make sure, which version of those missiles (120, 77) are actually modeled in the sim? Please note, DCS is home for aircrafts/tech from all different eras, some things are just non-comparable.

Edited February 10, 2013 by zerver