All Activity

Раритет первых серий. С гребнями под килями и без блоков выброса ловушек.

More informative error messages would certainly help. Same applies to the Error 500 issue. It shouldn't be too difficult to add human-readable error messages to the popup and the dcs.log, so users are not left absolutely clueless as to what is going on. I've even detailed a straightforward way to implement that. Should be feasible in a day's work.

Thank you so much brother. I appreciate your hard work!

Фото старое и не моё. А я там уже 3-4 года не появлялся. Так что всё возможно. ...Вот тоже не моё но уникальное точно.

Btw is it actually false warning? I thought it was more like the 21s RWR, where it just picks up radar from the entire battlefield but cant seperate them effectively. Outside of the own radar interference, that sounds pretty troubling.

347

Вот тут с 8.40 наглядно. При выборе пушки при захвате маркер именно на цели лежит.

Which page is this?

And youre not wrong with that. Maybe im bad at communicating it, but I think the difference isnt quite as big as people sometimes think. For example, is an F4 more suitable for solo operation than a Mig-21 in DCS? Sure! Yet if the Mig-21 gets AWACS support (like EWRS mod), it will immediately dominate the F4 in terms of SA. Give it real soviet style GCI and its not even funny anymore. I would assume the Mig-29 has better SA than the F4 tho, aside from the RWR. Its radar is superior and so is the view out of the cockpit. Aerodynamics/thrust also helps navigating and reacting to dangerous situations. The SPO15 is a weakpoint, but it can see SARH launches I 'think', which the F4 cant.

Overall, I agree with you, except for the missiles. The missiles in DCS are the best in any simulator. I've been following their development for many years. Also, ED guys wrote that the MiG-29 radar is completely based on the new physics and is currently the best in the simulator. Give it a try. We also got the completely new SPO, implemented as closely as possible to the original, and now I hope all future developments will be just as good.

Это баг или фича? по-моему у 29 не показывает (т.е в привычном для нас понимании) маркер на цель, показывает только отклонение антенны. Или я не прав?

From the changelog: With every update of the mod packs, I remove the assets that are now in DCS core.

Да? по-моему его уже там нет. В этом году июне по крайней мере точно не было

I haven't said there is anything better out there; if there were, I'd be there. DCS is the best there is. It doesn't change the fact, however, that overall ecm, rwr (especially blue), iff, radar (except maybe the F4s excellent pulse radar), missile behavior implementations in DCS are imaginative suppositions, which by the way is understandable as these are top secret pieces of info. And therefore realism is targeted by ED; it is not a set in stone promise or provision in DCS. If you have no problem rearming/repairing within minutes, then the same should apppy to other aspects. Gameplay is a thing.

The map should have nothing to do with it. Check for AI wingmen in your flight.

I agree. That's why the first batch of MiG-29s didn't have countermeasures dispensers at all. They did later, but they were only intended for flares. The threat from radar missiles was likely considered insignificant.

I have the same issue, that the Applicatiuon closes after a few seconds. Where do i check if the MENU Key is binded or not? In DCS?

Предыдущий не то выложил. Там уже значительно переделали. Это 29СМ вроде самый первый. Вот 29М. По сути обычный 29 только гак прикрутили. https://disk.yandex.ru/mail/?hash=FTFFQgmh6dGeNc5zSHOxEj9xx5%2B4m8dPfBpq04fI9S8Weo0LazvH8Rwq0WJRJesGq%2FJ6bpmRyOJonT3VoXnDag%3D%3D https://disk.yandex.ru/mail/?hash=9j%2B%2Bd7%2FJL3BLJovxfzbUsH3ha1e8n7Kodck47LCZUODEpKRnhncxWEOpCWfEv5d7q%2FJ6bpmRyOJonT3VoXnDag%3D%3D

Yes that is also a reason to dig deep and see if SPO works with radar in ДОГОН mode (P). Zoraja had his radar in ДОГОН while fighting which he stated.

That's what I do, as all the spo 15 does is distracting you with false warnings.

You're mistaken. The combat manual for the 9-13 aircraft (as you know, a later version than the 9-12) states the following in Russian: When the radar is switched on, it is impossible to use the information from the SPO-15 due to its erroneous and chaotic nature. And this isn't the only source of information prohibiting the use of SPO when the radar is switched on.

My point was more about the role the controller played in each doctrine. The F-4 was a multirole aircraft, and didn't always get AWACS coverage, for instance when escorting, or on a strike mission. The MiG, while it can be shoehorned into doing something other than GCI-guided DCA or CAP, really isn't very well equipped for that. Worth noting that in general, the impulse for developing the RWR system wasn't air combat, it was the SAMs. Which, notably, the Soviets were much less worried about, what with NATO being somewhat deficient in that area. There's a reason SPO-15 features a separate light (that gets absolute priority) and a whole subsystem for detecting what Nike Hercules is doing - you want to know when you're being painted by a nuclear-tipped SAM. Likewise, F-4's RWR was mostly a response to the proliferation of the SA-2, and further development took place to account for superior Soviet SAMs. Early on, RWRs on fighters simply weren't a thing, even when they were expected to face radar guided missiles in air combat. IRL, air combat depended not on locating the missile, but on watching what the launch aircraft is doing. As such, the SPO-15 was mostly concerned with ensuring the MiG didn't blunder into a Nike Herc envelope and get nuked out of the sky. It is adequate for the purpose of countering radar guided SAM threats of the era, not so much for surviving in a modern Fox 3 environment.

Manual page 89: What does it mean "before issuing the gorka command"? What is a Gorka command, and how do/why should I issue it? What does it mean "the aiming ring moves up or down in a jump"? I'm using difficulty making sense of these statements. Can someone please explain?

Same problem. Pimax Crystal. And turning off secondary shadows helped as well. Looks like it's VR specific. Crash log is the same every time OS-Version: 10.0.26100 () 0x100-0x1 0x00000000000a2782 (GraphicsCore): render::SecondaryShadowmapModule::collectShadowmaps + 0x42 0x00000000000a121b (GraphicsCore): render::SecondaryShadowmapModule::SecondaryShadowmapModule + 0x2AB 0x00000000000a2b96 (GraphicsCore): render::SecondaryShadowmapModule::collectShadowmaps + 0x456 0x000000000005d0e2 (GraphicsCore): render::BaseRenderingPass::prePass + 0x22 0x000000000005c627 (GraphicsCore): render::RenderGraph::lightsPrePass + 0x67 0x000000000016d8e4 (Visualizer): smSceneManager::regLua + 0x11C4 0x0000000000156ef4 (Visualizer): smCamera_Implement::getClipRegion + 0x1CC74 0x000000000014076c (Visualizer): smCamera_Implement::getClipRegion + 0x64EC 0x000000000015b602 (Visualizer): smSceneManager::DestroySceneManager + 0x1222 0x00000000000331e1 (edCore): ed::thread::_get_current_thread_id + 0x71 0x00000000000037b0 (ucrtbase): wcsrchr + 0x150 0x000000000002e8d7 (KERNEL32): BaseThreadInitThunk + 0x17

На вкус и цвет фломастеры разные. Вам удобно, мне не удобно. Должно быть удобно всем, а лучше как в реале. Буду добиваться от ED добавления команд в инпут. Их должно быть по три на каждую гашетку - убрано/откинуто/нажато. Посмотрите как отлично это реализовано в модуле Мираж Ф1, и полностью соответствует реалу. Плюс есть настройки реалистичности управления гашетками, чтобы всем фломастеры подошли. За это низкий поклон Аргесам как разработчикам. Почему ED скупятся с вариантами инпута мне не понятно. Надеюсь, что это просто ещё не проработано.