All Activity

Берёза, Россь...к нам как на запасной садились, разница в индикации в глаза не бросалась...

пол часа на бетоне провёл.... А вы заметили что кабина (как минимум обод фонаря) на самолёт весь зашаркан? Это не "нулёвый" самолёт, и нигде не написано что его обслуживали такой добросовестный ИТС, как Вы) По этому будем считать что они выцвели. Как и на всех кадрах которые я вам скидывал) Мне отвечал лётчик, который летал на МиГ-29 на ТРЁХ аэродромах. И нигде из этих Трёх аэродромах не видел зелёной индикации. Получается везде в ВКС раздолбаи, кроме Вас)

"Вы в каком полку служили?"

Thanks. Yes, I barely understand English. Except for a few words and sentences. Perhaps I expressed myself a bit unclearly. Sorry. Still, constantly reading "It works for me" or "Read the manual" instead of providing real solutions doesn't help anyone. To get back to the topic: If I'm flying the helicopter freely on a map, hovering the mouse over each switch, etc., and see that you can move those two black levers with the mouse, I assume you can use them in a cold boot. This isn't the case. So, my post was justified.

Достаточно живу и уж точно побольше вашего.... а не "совпадает" из- за простого раздолбайства и не желании личного состава поддерживать технику в требуемом состоянии...вы сами то сколько времени на "бетоне" провели?

Если не секрет, на каком аэродроме вы видели зелёную индикацию на МиГ-29?)

И в каких годах вы на этих самолётах летали? Я вот с 1981-го в ВВС, а с 2001-го непосредственно занимаюсь контролем за разработкой и испытаниями разнообразной а/т и ни где не встречал требования в ТТЗ(ТЗ),РКД, ТУ, РЭ, РТО и т.д о обозначении выпущенного положения шасси и механизации ЖЁЛТЫМ цветом.

ВЫ сколько на белом свете живёте товарищь...?null Надо как бы привыкнуть, что в жизни не всегд всё с документами совпадает. Вот вам ещё два примера)

First of all, I repeat again that by balance I am referring to having ALL systems of ALL aircraft modelled by same standards, meaning if MiG-29A RWR is modelled with flaws, then all other aircraft need to be done the same (but they are not), not to mention the flaws put into this RWR are put as the way the system was designed to function by default, and this is just wrong, I don't care what you believe in, I have noticed that you have that typical western bias against Russian/Soviet (and I think I am safe to assume Chinese also) anything, and second because of this you don't seem to add anything valuable with your comments.

Вы действительно не понимаете, что такое "стандартизация"???? Вам РУССКИМ языком со ссылкой на нормативные документы показали, как ОБЯЗАТЕЛЬНО должно быть и выставлять чьё то раздолбайство в виде примера, как минимум глупо!

If you're looking for balance, you can find it in plenty of other games. A simulator is designed to simulate the technology as it was, not how some players wants it to be. You can believe what you want, but in reality, all systems have their limitations. And electronic intelligence systems have many of them too. As for the SPO-15, there's nothing surprising about it. The Soviets were never strong in electronics and lagged behind the US by a decade.

I appreciate and respect your passion, but please stay on the topic.

The average power of the APG-63 is also greater than the average power of the N001: 2 kW versus 1.5 kW. You don't know history well. The first AWACS appeared in the US and were used during the Vietnam War, at a time when the USSR was still only considering it. The SAGE semiautomatic interceptor guidance system also first appeared in the US on F-102/106 aircraft. And after that, the Soviets began copying it, developing their own VOZDUKH systems.

Мало. Тащи ещё. Только ещё копипасту про скоростные характеристики 9-12 на уровне моря принеси уж тогда.

Ещё раз ПОВТОРЯЮ, обозначение выпущенного положения шасси и механизации ЗЕЛЁНОГО цвета, до приведённого ОСТа были другие нормативные документы, но цвет не менялся, не надо "натягивать сову на глобус" и придумывать детские отмазки, это всё равно, что спорить о цветах светофора...

Just as a data point, I tried a instant action mission yesterday (cold start caucasus), and wouldn’t you know it, I almost crashed because the frickin trim was inverted. I didn’t change a thing from earlier. Neither in DCS nor in VP config or TelemFFB. Tried another mission I made myself and everything went back to normal…… Can‘t wrap my head around it so far…..

B-1R The B-1R was a 2004 proposed upgrade of existing B-1B aircraft.[163] The B-1R (R for "regional") would be fitted with advanced radars, air-to-air missiles, and new Pratt & Whitney F119 engines (from the Lockheed Martin F-22 Raptor). This variant would have a top speed of Mach 2.2, but with 20% shorter range.[164] Existing external hardpoints would be modified to allow multiple conventional weapons to be carried, increasing overall loadout. For air-to-air defense, an active electronically scanned array (AESA) radar would be added and some existing hardpoints modified to carry air-to-air missiles

Yes, that effects Single Player all the same. The biggest offenders (next to Anti Virus real time protection) ate those I mentioned above. The Power service can be disabled permanently on a desktop system (well you loose any power savings functionality of course but I figured that performance is the No. 1 priority here). It is important that this isn’t the same as choosing a performance power plan (which will have the service probing the system all the time nevertheless). There is more in the services that can be permanently disabled but that’s a topic on its own and can be researched on youtube (Chris Titus e.g.) For reference, my system shows <100 processes in the task manager when idling on the desktop (whereas an unoptimised system can easily have >200). Admittedly most of this is OCD hygiene and not really noticeable as performance improvement since most processes are sound asleep when not needed. Different story with apps that are actually running WHILE you are flying. RGB, Hardware Monitoring, etc….. the more of those you can live without, the better. Some are worse than others. I couldn’t find an issue with Afterburner/Riva telemetry. But the fancy Aquasuit I control my custom waterloop with chops up the frame time pretty badly. Fortunately it doesn’t need to run.

it happened to me today, its a little bit different from yours but mostly caused by desync in MP A MIG29 fired 2 R27 in my direction, i visually saw the missile miss me, but still got me somehow Btw, Server TACVIEW trackfile

И что дальше следует из этой копипасты?

Actually you are wrong on this, in fact when it comes to both a game and realism, ED should in fact strive towards balance, and balance not meaning to make every jet working the same, but making a standard across all modules in terms of modelling of FM, avionics, damage, weapons etc... and not have one module done this way, while others the other way. Doing so IMHO just creates BIAS and away from realism, because realism doesn't just mean one thing being done realistically, while others which it is interacting with, are not. PS: I for one, do not accept that SPO-15 was done properly as I just can't believe Russian engineers would have designed this system this way. To model the system to always have some possible issues due to maintenance etc as if it was designed to work this way all the time, is just wrong and it seems this is how MiG-19A RWR has been modelled which is not alright.

B-1A The B-1A was the original B-1 design with variable engine intakes and Mach 2.2 top speed. Four prototypes were built; no production units were manufactured.[133][162] B-1B The B-1B is a revised B-1 design with reduced radar signature and a top speed of Mach 1.25. It is optimized for low-level penetration. A total of 100 B-1Bs were produced

Just remember that only works in CCIP when pipper is moving up the HUD

Yes, it’s in the manual by ED. You can try it yourself