All Activity

there has been an 'engine cooling' update about a year ago, or more, not sure if you haven't flown for that long. For the most part if you stay within the advertised engine regimes there's not a lot of 'bugs' that pop-up. However, if you start firewalling the throttle (even for very short periods of time) the answers to the questions such as "why did this fail?" become pretty elusive. That's DCS for you.

Actually, when I'm looking to the side to my wing tip. The missile is mich bigger than an Aircraft 1 NM away...... I can't really follow that argument. But hey, I've no clue. It's possible that you are right.

In MSFS and Xplane you're able to sync up your table on apps such as foreflight or Garmin pilot to see the aircraft and charts like a situational awareness app. It would be incredible if someone could figure out an ATAK plug in that allowed the same type of functionality. This will allow you to mission plan, have a moving map display of imagery, measure accurate distances from ground forces, have more information like phase lines and GRGs, and much more. ATAK is a free app made by the government and is only available to android users so no apple products unfortunately. But the capabilities for situational awarness atak brings is really cool and it would be amazing to use in DCS.

I need help to find the template folder for installing the mod. Where is it? Thank you.

Подскажите, знатоки. Немного запутался. Как должна выглядеть совместная работа РЛПК и ОЛС? Вчера экспериментировал. По идее, при включенной совместной работе, сначала хватает ведущий канал. И он выдает куда смотреть ведомому каналу. Когда схватил ведущий и ведомый они ведут совместно. Если один теряет, то второй поддерживает захват. Однако. ДВБ с ботом на Хорнете. Встречные курсы. Пуск Р-27 с дистанции где то километров 15. Бот ставит на 3-9 (маневр ночь) где то на удалении километров в 5-7 на форсаже. И РЛС его теряет. Захват срывается. Р-27 улетает по своим делам. То, что при ночи РЛС теряет захват не удивляет. А вот то, что разницы нет совсем между режимом совместной работы с ОЛС и без него (во всяком случае я этого не заметил) несколько удивило. ОЛС его не видит при таких то параметрах? БВБ. Тот же бот на Хорнете. То же самое. Исходил из того, что РЛ или ТП в случае подключения второго канала в режиме вертикального сканирования отображают ведущий канал. Но, опять же, никакой разницы по качеству сопровождения целей в БВБ отметить не смог. Это баг, или я чего то не понимаю. Правда полетать удалось немного. Чуть больше часа. Может и не увидел чего.

https://store.steampowered.com/app/3824490/Oasis_Driver_for_Windows_Mixed_Reality/ il creatore dei OpenXR ha sviluppato free, su piattaforma steam, dei driver chiamati Oasis, che riportano in funzione tutta una serie di VR che lavoravano solo con WMR. Installando steam e scaricando i driver, si effettua un "unlock" del visore/controller e a quel punto il visore diventa "nativo" per SteamVR, funzionando direttamente con quello. E' il modo con cui io sto' usando il mio Reverb G1, con grande soddisfazione. Funziona? Eccome! Pure meglio, non avendo più WMR come passaggio intermedio.

Download the updated campaign from here Operation Piercing Fury V1.52

What has me completely baffled is that from the moment the BF109K-4 came out in access, I have never had these problems with engine stops. I don't usually fly it live, but I have flown it a couple or three times a week, and this has been a surprise to me.

OK. Thanks @Vakarian and @MeanJim - both of your answers were very helpful. The incompatibility thing was nailed, and after practicing with the advanced pod I got good enough to find and hit my targets. Some targets I could never find, but I guess that's like real life too

Есть подозрение, что вопрос в унификации. Такой же блок управления закрылками стоял и на МиГ-23. Там положений механизации, как раз, три.Тут еще писали, что на двадцать девятых поздних выпусков использовался блок на две кнопки.

You may try to change order of OpenXR layers.

Because this have small objects involved. I'll check MSAA and report back.

During the landing phase just behind an AI-controlled F-16, the player touches down a few seconds before the AI aircraft. Instead of continuing straight ahead after touchdown, the AI suddenly makes a sharp turn on the runway. MAP: SINAI Airport: Hatzor

It is not giving me trouble with any other game, software or whatever other than DCS, but we don't know for sure its G HUB.

У меня ощущение, что я схожу с ума... если между положениями "ВЗЛЕТ" и "ПОСАДКА" нет никакой разницы, то зачем для выполнения одного и того же действия делать, соответственно, две разные кнопки (по кнопке "УБРАНЫ" вопросов нет)? Логичнее было бы сделать только "ВЫПУЩЕНО" и "УБРАНО", а то прям какой то бредятиной попахивает...

I get what you are suggesting, but why would that apply specifically to the missile/rails and nothing else? I have a little bit of ghosting with fast aircraft moving against the background with DLAA, but nothing llike the jittering of the missiles.

You have a temporal anti aliasing turned on (DLSS, DLAA, TAA, FSR...) With a temporal solution for anti aliasing, some object movements are nullified (wingtip and rails) while others are conserved (wingtip AAMRAMS). It is dependent on contrast and size. So they appear disconnected. Try to zoom right into the missile and rail to see if the rail and missile are moving together. IIRC I did that and saw them properly connected. It is been a while I don't use MSAA and always saw this discrepancy using DLAA since late 2023 when I got the Viper. There are other instances of this phenomenon happening as well, in and outside DCS.

he's talking about the mw-50 vs fuel in the mw-50 tank. Technically, you overboosted the engine only once (without mw50), so this switch's position shouldn't really matter that much so early into the flight time, however I noticed you got to 2600rpm & 1.4 ATA pretty quickly and stayed there until the engine failure. Try limiting to 1.3 ATA max and see if that extends the engine's life (don't over-boost to 1.8 ata either, even if just for a split second). null

yes it can if you take off from the carrier with an incorrect trim ....

Another big thing to think about is the size of your target. You can pick up a flight of bombers at 50k ft. Pretty much at the max range of your scope. MIG 21s and other smaller single seat fighters have a smaller RCS if they're heading straight at you. So listening to that "Hot/Cold/Flanking" should give you an idea of when you will pick up the target. And if youre doing things manually, which Aspect knob to use.

In my mind, G-HUB is an absolute crap piece of software that shouldn't be running if possible. Other's milage may vary. Only thing it is good for, is to keep the rainbow puke on my mouse at bay, but for that I'm not willing to compromise my DCS experience.

My perception from the video is, that there is much more wing tip movement due to the inertia of the missiles, but the connection between the missile and its rail seems rock solid. What I was going for ist that in the game the missiles jiggle relative to their rails. The momentum on the wing is missing for the most part. But that's just not a feature and no "bug" afaik.

I'm not so sure if the real world methods are applicable to a Joystick in front of or on top of a desk.... Trust me on that. The less resistence your stick offers, the better for helicopter flying. Ideally you would have a stick that has no/little/adjustable spring re-centering force and holds every postion you put it in (like a real world cyclic would), but that would need a FFB-Device like the VP Rhino of FFBeast (or the frinckin' Moza). VERY recommendable - but VERY expensive as well.... With a common spring loaded joystick, it is vital, that you choose the right trimming mode in the special options and learn how it works! You DON'T want to fight the stick!

For me, everything is running fine with the OG Crystal. No crashes and very good performance. You might want to check if you run some unofficial mods or did do some fancy stuff to the finicky pimax software. A full repair of DCS might also help.

The pressure thing was a British Army instructor teaching new pilots to take off/hover in their first Gazelle lesson, in a 1990s documentary. I figured he'd know what he was talking about... I already have no curve set, nor any saturation. It's all on default, +/- zero. I'll have a play with the trim later tonight... and try not to look at my dashboard!