Leaderboard

Bah, I thought not again, one was in March already :D

Hi to all, I present to them the state in which my new project is, is a slightly ambitious project, and the one who knows perhaps someday is seen by us inside the BS or in some of the Series of DCS. Good gentlemen the new project in which I have embarked in these moments, after looking for all the information that I could have found on the topic for different routes, it is the new acquisition of Spanish Army Aviation “Famet“, together with France, Germany and Australian Army Aviation and this one is the new helicopter of attack Eurocopter Tiger, in this case I have praised myself for the one that I have closer that it is Eurocopter Tiger HAD, but good you will try to do four variants that exist today of the Tiger, that are, the German variant the Tiger UHT (Unterstützungshubschrauber Tiger), the French the Tiger HAP (Helicoptere d'Appui Protection), the Spaniard the Tiger HAD (Helicóptero de Apoyo y Destrucción) and the Australian the Tiger ARH (Armed Reconnaissance Helicopter). I put a series of Render of the Tiger, the project is very young, and a lot of work stays that to do, so that to give completed the process of modeling, but good already sees something and wanted to share it with you, and with the hope that I have said before when the model should be finished it is possible to include inside the series of Sims DCS. These render are the different aspects for the one that the model has spent for the time being. The current aspect of the project. I hope that they should like this project and good anything that they see does not hesitate to comment on it but remember that a lot of modeling work still stays. If it finds information, interesting linkage, photos, etc, on the Tiger, they will be well received. They can continue the development of the project in this link. http://www.cruzdesanandres.com/foro_v2/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=5447 A greeting and good hunting.

Provide air support to a battalion sized defensive operation. Includes singleplayer and multiplayer versions. The mission features custom made radio calls of the ground forces, make sure to listen what they have to say about the situation on the ground. The size of your operation area gives room for different approaches and the mission features several ways how the battle can unfold. This should offer some pretty good replayability. http://cid-f33d8b1019e6f4ac.skydrive.live.com/self.aspx/Public/FlexibleDefense.zip (File updated on 7. Feb with some small fixes) I am quite happy how this mission turned out. The custom radio calls are better this time around, although you should not expect professional quality. I can change my voice only so much and my accent just doesn't want to go away :) Speaking those samples is actually really difficult. I guess I said each of them around 20 times... I hope you enjoy the mission and suggestions are as always welcome.

Решил попробовать сделать пост-обработку скриншота моего любимого штурмовика :) Результат: Оригинал: Добавлены: облака, срыв потока (совсем чуть-чуть), дым из движков, горячий воздух, блики на стекле (и вообще на самолете), тени, немножко изморози, видоизмененный бекграунд (горы, домики, деревья), очень много работы с цветностью и резкостью. Следующим будет мой любимый вертолет :D Надеюсь вам понравится!

STOP! HOLD IT RIGHT THERE! READ NO FURTHER UNTIL YOU HAVE READ MY PRE-QUESTION!!!!!!!! Pre-question: I am 36 yrs of age. I have been flying Falcon since day 1.......on and off. What I love about falcon> I just love to fly man. I love the *idea* of realistic weapons systems, and avionics......and I love the *idea* of having to learn 487 button combinations just to start the aircraft, if I so choose. What I hate about Falcon.......same as above LOL. Seriously, I've noticed a pattern with myself. I install it, fly around for a while, buzz the towers and stuff :thumbup: but I think only once have I ever really taken it seriously enough to fly 100% realism, actually program my HOTAS, actually LEARN the weapons systems, and I did manage to win ONE campaign. ONE, in 10 years now? LOL. I get frustrated at having to learn it.......get bored.......uninstall it or never fly it until the "Next" version comes out (which is now FF5) and then have to "re-learn" everything. It get's old, and frustrating. Now, let's be real for a moment.....when LOMAC came out.......A LOT of die hards from the Falcon camp frowned upon it. I DON'T CARE WHY. I DON'T KNOW WHY. All I do know, is at the time, I was firmly in the Falcon camp so I never bothered with LOMAC. Fast forward to today. DCS BLackshark. I personally was like OMFG , I could not believe the videos I was seeing. Ok, So I'm hooked on Blackshark. Cool. The graphics in my humble opinion is jaw dropping. I LOVE IT!!!!!! And it seems to have the same falcon like learning curve (huge) if you want to go that route. (Like I said, I love the IDEA of that, but probably won't ever learn it lol) So, tonight, I was browsing thru the forums here and hit the lomac forums. Honestly, it's the first time I have seen screenshots, and screenshots of the mods. In a word: OH MY GOD!!!!!!! I wanted to say all of that because I have been around long enough to know that there is somewhat of a beef between the Falcon camp and the Lomac camp. I know that. I understand that. I don't know why exactly, and I don't care why honestly. I'm not here to start any crap. What I want to know.......what is the major differences between Falcon, and Lomac? The falcon camp says lomac is just eye candy. That may be true, I don't know......but if a good lookin' chick is just "eye candy"....sure doesn't stop me from trying her out. So the logic there doesn't make sense to me. Could someone with 1st hand knowledge of both give me the real low-down. An adult, non flamewar, straight to the point low down on both games? Pro's con's. Etc. I am sorry for the long windedness of my post, but I wanted to make 2 things clear. 1) I've been around awhile, so I know this somewhat murky water........and 2) This is only my 3rd post here, and wanted to be crystal clear that I only seek the truth about lomac compared to falcon, without starting a ridiculous war and being percieved as a trouble maker or something. Thank you in advance for any answers.

hello superkungfu, and thanks for your great flanker:thumbup: i have to finish all the russian planes because they share files. (hud...ect) so it would look a bit weird to release only the fulcrum and 25t and have alf the other done. i need one more week to finish the 25t. then i will go back on the 27 and the 33. on thoses two planes i will only do the front panel, not the sides and canopy. later perhaps.:cry:

*checks the topic* Damn you X-Man :P Alright, back on topic ;)

All I can say is that what ever 3GO, Simmod, or Ruggbutt does next in the DCS/FC mod department, I will be some where near the front of the line to grab it. This type of high quality modding is transforming one of our favorite combat flight sims into a thing of even greater beauty and deeper immersion. Thank you, Thank you, Thank you for all of your outstanding effort and generosity in creating these Mods! Out

Very nice work! Out

Please stick to the topic guys! Otherwise a moderator might show up and correct you ;) Oops, he's already here :P

i'll wait till you test it for me Mustang:music_whistling:..lol im still using 8.12:thumbup:

Actually, from what I have gathered lately unity among the NATO members is growing. France seems to have taken steps towards re-entering the NATO command structure (as opposed to just being a NATO member). And one has to realize that the differences of opinion are on rather "light" topics - the fact that some NATO members didn't quite agree with the war in Iraq and therefore bitched a bit at Bush doesn't mean that they would refuse an official cause for assistance in the case of a direct attack. (A clause in the treaty that the US could technically have invoked after 9/11 but chose not to, since it's pretty difficult to call your allies to defend you from an attack of a non-nation.) But in the case of an actual conventional attack there would be no such squabbling - the clause would be invoked and even as that is being arranged the central NATO structure will be conducting operations. On the other hand, in the event of an american conventional attack against Russia they would not be able to call for such assistance under the NATO treaty, and we all know what tends to happen to people who think it's a trivial thing to commit to a conventional invasion of Russia. :P Finally, it will be a LONG time before the european NATO members would be in a position where a defensive alliance with the US could be seen as "unecessary". US military expenditure in 2009: 651,1 billion US dollars EU military expenditure in 2009: 312,2 billion US dollars, including non-NATO members. On the other hand, People's Republic of China 2009 spending: 70,2 billion US dollars Russia 2009 spending: 50 billion US dollars Now, the real trouble with all of these things is of course that you get more roubles for the dollar than you get dollars for the rouble, so to speak. Pure spending would place russia below the UK, but it is quite arguable that the UK is the weaker in pure power. (How the case would be in force projection is something else though that is more difficult to judge.) Put I do have great difficulty seeing the UK backing out of the free assistance of the US atlantic and med fleets - it would cost a shitload for the UK to replace those assets that they are effectively getting for free. And a final tidbit on the spendings side to emphasize just how far away it would be for european NATO members to drop the association to the US, the US spending of 651 billion dollars is more than half of the estimated one trillion dollars spent by NATO members. Amongst the NATO members the values you get for the dollar is also roughly the same (as opposed to the fact that Russia can build more materiel per dollar than NATO can), so replacing the strength would be equal or greater - greater because they would then either have to purchase american equipment to replace their stuff, or undergo massive restructuring programs to expand their own military-industrial infrastructure. So in the end, Europe won't be ditching the US anytime soon, and no-one else even comes close to the force projection capabilities that the yanks have. Whether those US tax dollars are well spent is another question, though. :P EDIT: Numbers were fished up from Wikipedia, so they're not gospel.

I send a PM too Devas ;)

еще раз своп отключать нерекомендуется!!!! все что нужно падает в оперативку!!! Game Prelauncher поставил? попробывал?

Hello! I think, thats a very great project in here and an absolutly "must have" for every aircraft fan if some day your Mig21 will be complete. So many nations, so many colour shemes so many versions- Absolutly wonderfull:thumbup:. I like this work very well. My best wishes, TOM

OK Sir!!! PM send :thumbup: :book:

Почитал ветку и есть что сказать: В локоне вовсе не такая шоколадная флайт модель как тут многие считают. Примеры корявой ФМ в локоне ГС – это далеко не все. Миг-29: Выход на сверхзвук без форсажа с двумя фаб-500 и 4 ракетами р-73 – легко. Максимальная скорость что с 1 что с 3 ПТБ - 2М! Перегрузка на дозвуке с любой загрузкой – 9g. Су -27: Максимальная скорость с 6 р-27 и 4 р-73 = 1.47 М. Максимальная перегрузка 9g на дозвуке при любой заправке топливом и загрузке. Угол атаки 30 градусов – как по рельсам. F – 15 Максимальная скорость что с 1 что с 3 ПТБ – одинаковая. Перегрузка на сверхзвуке 6.5 ед. На дозвуке тоже сфероконина. Угол атаки 22гр. Су - 25, Су – 25Т эти у.. гхм пепелацы лично мне не интересны – подробно не тестил, но падение скорости с движками на МГ и загрузкой ПТБ + чугуний заставляет задуматься. РЛС: И почему срыв сопровождения только на фоне земли и только если цель 4/4. По характеристикам РЛС, только одно слово БАЛАНС. Да и про весь симухлятор то же можно сказать. ЭПР от подвесок не зависит. Су -33 и кораблики: просто шоколад аркадный, даже радиогоризонт пофигу. Ракеты – баланс, р-60 в ППС, захват после пуска ТГСН, наведение на помеху всего что можно, аим-120 опустили, р-77 задрали. Просто прелесть. АИ тупой, в ганзо еще более-менее, продуктивно только тормозит, поставьте хотябы 50 самолетов с простенькими задачами с фпс можно распрощатся, с таким о динамической кампании лучше даже не мечтать. Компания набор миссий не связанных с друг другом, не видел ни одной похожей на масштабный бой. Теперь о Фальконе – пользую Редвайпер до этого ОФ 4.5, ФФ5 пока не видел (судя по количеству баг репортов - сырой). То, что ФМ якобы для всех ЛА там от Ф-16 – неверно. Задаются там все необходимые аэродинамические параметры, смотрите, мануал к RV, не помогает – тогда RV/sim/ ACDATA. Другое дело, что не все ФМ одинаково хороши, но при желании и соответствующей информации характеристики правятся по счету раз. То, что там якобы опущены ВВС – лажа. Очень много самолетов задраны по самое небалуй, но перекосы встречаются, что у синих, что у красных ;-) С ракетами тоже есть перекосы, наши задрали просто Ужас (пример – р98 перегрузка 21g!!!) . Кстати пользователи ОФ не радуйтесь там 90% перекосов в тех же местах (Миг-29 задрали в ОФ так что еще чуток и получиться звезда смерти). С подвесками лабуда, как правило для наших самолетов. Если кто кинет ссылку на толковый редактор подвесок к RV/OF буду благодарен. Минус то, что набор БРЭО для всех самолетов (игрока) от ф-16, характеристики БРЭО отличаются. Ракеты воздух – поверхность с лазерной и рл гсн работают как с ик. Пока все, можете метать табуретки.

HAHA made my day:D i will change the colours a bit and get back yo you guys:smilewink: Thanks for the inputs, its very useful :thumbup:

Happy Birthday man! Be good have Fun! (Тhis is for the BD in March 2009, I know you have one more in November :D ) :drunk:

Regards Intruder

А как я хохотал в миссии, где оказываешься один на острове и вот-вот должны прилететь враги, чтоб тебя убрать, но в то же время есть шанс дождаться своих. Так вот приперлись два UH-60 c десантом и я их всех убил :) Половину десантников еще в воздухе :megalol: Интересно - что подумали подоспевшие на помощь морпехи? В "Коммандо" была такая сцена :)

1) Here's the afterburner animation but it's pretty far from the cameraman: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1MekoxJfE2Q 2) Nice AB pic at 3:25 3) MiG-21F-13 (type74), some interesting shots of nose cone and control surfaces movement at 1:10-1:20: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XH_lklsTCpw 4) Here some pics: Might be useful for damage model: More photos taken during overhaul: http://rides.webshots.com/photo/2728698030061271690vjuaiW http://rides.webshots.com/photo/2560204520061271690WIErlU http://rides.webshots.com/photo/2183127850061271690pVkWjn http://rides.webshots.com/photo/2661984940061271690DYsZno http://rides.webshots.com/photo/2032547860061271690qUhYKn http://rides.webshots.com/photo/2573485600061271690ulTVua http://rides.webshots.com/photo/2694720750061271690IoJZBK

Hi, Firstly thanks to DCS for bringing Blackshark, fantastic simulator I see Im gonna be still playing it for years to come. ..Other simulators.. Ive played so many different sims, from battle of britain on Speccy, Hornet on amiga to Orbiter,IL2,etc on PC. I recently came across a Mars sim, which allows the player (single or multi (which is better)) to 'be on mars' and survive, collecting water,generating O2,fuel for launch vechile, survey, sampling and exploration. It plays like a FPS (allthough not a single weapon or alien in sight!) and it quite a complex, with power failures, O2 leaks, rad storms etc etc. Its still in Beta and the indy company are continusly adding content ( drivable rovers, farm units, wind turbines etc soon).. Its such a different and atmospheric type of sim, that Ive been totally hooked- its defo worth a look if your into a game where you have to think a bit to survive - try looking at http://www.hyperkat.com/ for more info. Regards!

IL2 gots tits, eh? *slowly makes his way to the shelf where the IL2 box is sitting so his wife won't notice*. ROFL @ Strike Fighters. Yeah, that was my take-away from the hour I spent playing WoE. LOMAC is missing, but I think I found her: http://xmb.stuffucanuse.com/xmb/viewthread.php?action=attachment&tid=4346&pid=12685 :megalol:

Give 3GO time to recuperate and then ask, I Believe it took them 18 months to make the wonderful SU-27 Mod, they need a rest

I want to fly new SU-33~~~~~ :D

I readed you PM Nitro_74, you have one PM, i hope i helped you. Sorry for my english ;)

Well a 3d model is a massive project so for us to ask and pressure them is not our place. We can only hope. But I do agree that the most logical choice would be the Su-33 since its airframe is similar to the Su-27. The MiG-29 would have to be a complete new project from scratch.

Well how 'bout 3GO MiG-29K?! Alfa, back me up here!

LO's MiG-29 is good. Better would be Su-33 :D

MOD to do a serious need to spend substantial time and effort we are still lack of personnel but after the production of our accumulated a certain amount of experience, we believe that we will continue to do and to do better but we are not going to do an organized MOD has begun production my english is so bad sorry

Another year lost to video games! :D I shall sacrifice many beers in your honor.

Happy Birthday! :drunk: