303_Kermit

Hallo. I experienced repeated problem with AiM-9B on high altitude (38 000ft) while trying to shoot at B-52H, on MP server. I can't launch the missile. Master arm on, trigger unlocked, "croissant equation" on, (green lamp is on). Is there anything I'm missing? Or it's some bug. can anyone repeat my problem?

Flying on populated servers with GCI is very frustrated. I fly and enjoy the view, Heat blur CW when: - how many contacts around me in 10 nm range? -8 -I don't see any. -don't worry they can't see you either.

I never heard about ED being involved in removing bugs from 3'rd party module. TBH I also never heard about Magnitude / Leatherneck removing any bugs either. It's tradition and honour of those 3'rd party dev. - to collect oldest bugs in DCS. If you want to see even more impressive collection of bugs buy MiG-21 "Unfinischedbed" by Magnitude.

nullLatest activities: -Live combat trainings on Heatblur Cold War Server live PvP training in Hostile environment null-Night Bombing mission also Heatblur Cold War Server. -BFM Training with Instructor and Aggressors. Polish language is welcomed, but any guest is appreciated. We speak English and German. Ostatnie aktywnosci: -Treningi walki mysliwskiej na maszynie 2 miejscowej (Mirage F-1BE) z instruktorem na serwerze HBCW w srodowisku PvP. -Nocne Bombardowania z JTAC i dlugimi litaniami 9-Line, polaczone z nawigacja w nocy. -Treningi BFM pod okiem instruktora z wykorzystaniem maszyn 2 miejscowych (Mirage F-1BE). null Język Polski mile widziany

You mean Unfinishedbed?

Tactical commentary to prop up the subject I'd love to have Mi-2 in DCS.

Here you go Sir! There is a flight from Hama to King Hussein. At start TACAN ch:21 (Incirlik) and VOR Incirlik) are perfectly clear received. The further I go south signal weakens till it's completely lost. In spite of it flag never appears. The same situation is with VOR. Here signal is stronger, but even during frequency change, when no station is being received flag doesn't appear. I'm sorry that track isn't short. If it's a problem, I'll make a new one. server-20241013-145125.trk

I'll take care about it. Problem occurs by MP missions.

I recommend the video of HIP about it. Last year we had reported WIP on 18 FF modules (19 if one includes SAAB Draken form HB). No counting here ED and Razbam modules from obvious reasons. Since a year no slightest progress report in any of them (The exception is polychop with his Kiowa). Not a single word. Correct me if I'm wrong here.

Can you please also answer to my bug report?

Did you ever tried simply to reduce canopy reflections?

Dear Aegress Thank you for your amazing work. Your model is a true masterpiece. I like it more and more every next flight. I found 2 3 problems which I can't resolve myself. Can you please help? 1. TACAN / VOR Flag - As far as I know it shall inform me, when those systems goes outside range, and their readouts are unreliable. I fly mostly on Syria and PG map, and those flags seem to work only very rarely. Most of cases I find TACAN out of range, and in spite of it, flag don't appear. With th VOR situation is the same. 2. I use second screen to work as MFD. It works well on CE, but BE seem to have strange appearance. Please see the photo: CE looks like that: (photo nr 1) and BE has some missing texture: (photo number 2) 3. There is one warning lamp in cockpit which I filed to understand: on the left front panel. In the instruction it's named "Receptacle light" (page 18 englisch instruction by Aegres). Can you please clarify a purpose of these warning lamp? I failed to observe it ever working... (photo number 3) PS. If the questions/ problem were already posted somewhere else I kindly excuse. I failed to find it. Thank you for your work With my best regards

How true. I look for high quality module , not a mod with simplified unverified FM.

Sad but true

I also do poses Rift-s I can say many nice thing about them. They're great... For Minecraft VR. And I left them there. Actually they're IMO Minecraft dedicated since every game looks like Minecraft in them.

Big problem with your feedback is, that you apparently don't understand the problem. Can you please allow yourself to watch the Video below? It was already posted by @Zakson85 @SharpeXB please be so kind and stop writing nonsense. Start from understanding the problem.

I suggest moving the topic to ED - since it's hard to expect , that Magnitude Leatherneck will develop anything soon... God I'd love to fly MiG-21 FL/PF/PFM ... or full fidelity MiG-21bis

And that concludes the show. The true problem is not how big are the dots, but why the hell they disappear. And there's even bigger question: Why nobody reports "We took it as our top priority, since the problem makes game in bigger perspective unplayable, or playable in very limited scenario options MP and SP". And just how Bignewy mentioned. Stick to the subject gents.

Read my post till the end.

Do you have some valuable Statistics, or you just guessing? If you base on personal experience then I'll base on mine saying that 100% DCS players play mostly online, since Offline is no really an alternative. I'm not sure if ... ED knows what are true numbers. Mine word against yours sir. that is one Two: In Digital Combat Simulator - (I suppose title suggest that Game has something to do with aerial warfare) - seeing a planes around you is something important. I don't think that Zakson is overreacting. Statement comes from yt video based on another yt video based on .... It's not valid source. Statement, that "90% of our users!" - is not the same as 90% of DCS players. in fact it may be some very small number.

Definitely. Both modernisations are performed in purpose to extend service of outdated planes and give them capability to fight against modern gen 4 fighters. From my professional point of view - waste of money. just like Italian modifications of F-104. useless for aerial warfare of '90-2005 but surely not suited for scenario anytime in '60-'70 -'80. Great for War thunder... and only there. AiM-9X+AiM-120 vs AiM-9L+AiM-7F/M (there's strong discussion about F-16C bl.25) T/W ratio 1,4 vs 1,05 (0,98 for early F-16C) . Difference between old F-16 and new F-16 is huge. Old one is gen4 fighter and new one is gen 4+. Fact. F-18C is much closer to F-18A, but avionics is main difference. IMO Situation Awareness of F-18C is much better than in his older brother. Facts are that F-16 modelled in DCS is not suited to any CW scenario. MiG-29 / Su-27 are much closer. I think it's main tragedy of DCS, that we have very modern F-16CM bl50 and F-18C , instead of F-18A and F-16A/B bl.15(ocm or not) or F-16C/D bl. 25 Anyway.... Stick to the MiG-21 gents.

I would rather say barely cold war. Wasn't used in any conflict until 1992. and after wikipedia: It's last huraaah!. Not the main stream plane as we see in most scenarios.

The production Su-27 (sometimes Su-27S, NATO designation 'Flanker-B') began to enter VVS operational service in 1985, although manufacturing difficulties kept it from appearing in strength until 1990. Source: "Airplanes - Military Aircraft - Su-27SÊ - Historical background". Sukhoi Company (JSC). Archived from the original on 14 February 2015. Retrieved 4 February 2015. link:https://web.archive.org/web/20150214080912/http://www.sukhoi.org/eng/planes/military/su27sk/history/

"The devil lies between the details" F-16A - yes , it's pure CW plane. Very modern for the time F-16A bl.15ocu from 1988, would be perfect adversary for MiG-29A. F-16C bl.25 from 1984, very late CW and very needed. But armed in AiM-120 and AiM9X F-16CM in DCS ? Nope. Very far past that era. F18A - Cold war plane, Eldorado Canyon was serious combat operation. Operation Prairie Fire was key part of it. I'll never deny. But F-18C - it's first serious action was Desert Storm 1991 (according to most historians it's last year of cold war as such). Not a cold war plane Su-25 - that one is true late cold war plane. my only problem with it is, that it's main area of operations was Afghanistan. rather one sided campaign. For middle east conflicts, Vietnam war conflicts, India vs Pakistan conflicts - we need different birds. The same case is with A-10. First combat use 1991 Persian Gulf. MiG-29A - some very limited numbers of cheaper versions of that plane (with downgraded avionics and radar from MiG-23) saw combat during later stage of Iran-Iraq but Saddam bought them not sooner than 1989. Their first serious action was... Desert Storm 1991. So - however MiG-29A was king of the sky of second half of '80 it didn't saw true action during cold war, except Farnborough Air Show ;-). Using them in every possible cw scenario is pure fantasy. one may use F-15E, B-1B, B-2, Tu-160 etc. if we follow that logic... Bollocks. Su-27 - officially entered service in 1990. CCCP collapsed one year later 1991. Before that marvelous plane truly entered service, (pilots need to learn new plane, new tactic has to be developed etc. etc.) CCCP collapsed and cold war was over. It's not cold war plane, but it's rather last hurrah! of CCCP aircraft industry. So.... Do you realize that none of DCS plane you mentioned is actually cold war era combat plane?

I'm ready to pay 2x as much for proper MiG-21 FAMILY made the way how Heatblur did their F-4 Phantom II MiG-21F-13 MiG-21FL MiG-21PF/PFM MiG-21SMT MiG-21MF MiG-21R MiG-21bis both variants (face lifting. new 3d new Flight model, new damage model, exactly modelled systems). Stop neglecting fans of Cold War era aviation. To be honest... MiG-21 family vs F-4 Family .... Mi-24 /Mi-2/Mi-8 vs UH-1H/AH-1G/CH-47C, solid portion of A2G attack planes of both sides + that what's promised F-104, A-7, A-6, A-1 ... and I'll forget anything else exist in dcs... F-16? F18? MiG-29? A-10? Su-25/27/33....? “Frankly, my dear, I don't give a damn.”