dwm

I found (up to now) three areas with bomb and strafing targets: Bergen Range (look at FRG 50 Helicopter base) Baumholder Range (thats the one at FRG 51) "Bombodrome" Wittstock (look at GDR 34). All have nearly the same layout, just different orientation on the map. According to Wikipedia Baumholder and Wittstock really have been used for air-to-ground.

Eher nicht, vermute ich. Die Strassen passen einigermassen, POI auch, aber der Rest der Gebäude ist halt nach grob nach Kategorie modelliert. War mal dienstlich in Tel Aviv und wollte mir in DCS das Bürohaus anschauen, da war in DCS aber ein Parkplatz. Ich finde das jetzt nicht schlimm, klar möchte man mal mit der F18 über das eigene Haus düsen aber der technische Aufwand ... die müssten ja für JEDES Gebäude ein 3d Modell machen.

Thanks guys, especially Rudel. Tried after slow repair, ,looks good, no clue what happened.

Seems that 2.9.10.3948 now finally broke it. The fix (the old fx files) now break shader compile, without the fix, the missions are broken and also won't load.

I was really looking forward to the updated German pack ... but that's for me the icing on the cake ... thanks CH!! Really appreciate all your hard work!

Thats a whole can of worms opened up ... My fear is that will not make a solution come any sooner

Somehow I'm sure we're in a time loop. How often has this been discussed now?

Well, it's a difficult situation, and we (the community) all wish it's resolved. Talking about transparency. Lot of people here say, there should be more transparency ... - Stating the situation on ED's shop - The takeover of the RB modules by ED, is it possible, will it eventually happen - refunding policies ... - ... and the state of the negotiations. You all read the statements. I agree, i personally would wish to know all of these. But i'm also thinking about the signal effects that would have ... basically it would would signal to most of the people i'm reading here simply "worst case happened, lets start the refunding race". That would not help in any way. So, as long as we hear nothing, at least we can hope for a positive outcome. And frankly, I don't necessarily want a refunding, I want working modules, that's why i obtained them About the whole "source code" thing ... well, "normally" something like that would be solved by a escrow at a trusted party, which would release the code to ED at certain conditions. Are the conditions met? Is the escrow updated at latest state, or was that neglected in the "hurry up" of a release? Would not having the code in escrow rectify stop of payment? Nobody here would expect to get informed about that details, right? So my summary - while i'm really not, repeat NOT happy with the situation, i can to some extent understand the information policy. Nevertheless to both RB and ED ... its already 2 months, and patience somehow is running out. The situation is damaging both of you, more than you even might realize - the community understood suddenly, that they give a lot of money for something virtual, which can "evaporate" on a very short notice, and thats really a basic problem. So, whatever you talk - hurry up

Cool

Also had a crash after a Bronco mission... used also NS430 there. Needs probably a little invstigation ...

The amundsen.zip file - the textures for the Amundsen Icebreaker seems to be broken in the download. These are cool ships ...

Thought about that too ... Rudel_chw, I think thats exactly the way to go. Maybe there would be the possibilty to define "routes" which are just a "series" of trigger zones, so ships could randomly spawn in one of the zones of a "route" and then follow through ... Think of a Tankers going through the street of hormuz ...

Very cool, thanks very much for that

Hat perfekt geklappt. Vielen Dank für die Organisation!! CU

Nice skins ... i wonder if we could have also the west german variant with the new template? The 24+20 ? tnx !