Skarp

I don’t think setting the radar to silent will stop it from sending an active command. Did you clear the track or just had an X Over it? Yeah so as long as the memory track holds it will send an active command. Hit the PLM button to clear the track and it won’t go active. Memory hold I believe is 2 minutes

AI T80s will no longer attack targets at range at night unless they are within arms reach of the enemy unit. T80NightBug.trk

Any updates for the fighter to fighter integration?

Ramp cold start: Jester does not connect DL to the ship F14 ramp cold carrier jester does not connet to ship.trk

Not connected to ship DL when spawning hot on carrier. It will not be connected to any DL on spawn. F14 ramp hot spawn carrier DL not connected to ship.trk

Thank you Deka for such an amazing module. You have done a fantastic job! It’s always on the top of the list for recommended modules for DCS.

Yes I’ve also seen this as well. Not so much rubber banding but teleporting.

Taliban have employed the tactic of airbursting RPGs over the tops of marine fobs. Although I’ve not heard an instance someone has been wounded by one.

updated OP with track showing an example.

have an Abrams driving full speed on a road and try to drop a gbu12 or laser rocket. the weapons will hit just behind them and miss. laserbugjf17.trk

would be nice to know :D

This is a complex CTD but it’s caused by players that are frozen in space due to them lagging out. So I can’t make a track of it. SYNCING|R2|1023:1024 groundrecievehit: blue M1134 Stryker ATGM(Jaxon) has hit red Ka-50(=DDCS= Bane 61) with BGM-71 TOW - +15 groundrecievehit: blue M1134 Stryker ATGM(Jaxon) has hit red Ka-50(=DDCS= Bane 61) with BGM-71 TOW - +15 groundrecievehit: blue M1134 Stryker ATGM(Aim9Sidewinder2020) has hit red Su-25T(=DDCS=Hawkeye) with BGM-71 TOW - +15 M1134 Stryker ATGM has given 15 to Aim9Sidewinder2020 on 2, Total: { blueRSPoints: 570 } groundrecievehit: blue M1134 Stryker ATGM(Aim9Sidewinder2020) has hit red Su-25T(=DDCS=Hawkeye) with BGM-71 TOW - +15 M1134 Stryker ATGM has given 15 to Aim9Sidewinder2020 on 2, Total: { blueRSPoints: 585 } groundrecievehit: blue M1134 Stryker ATGM(Aim9Sidewinder2020) has hit red Su-25T(=DDCS=Hawkeye) with BGM-71 TOW - +15 M1134 Stryker ATGM has given 15 to Aim9Sidewinder2020 on 2, Total: { blueRSPoints: 600 } groundrecievehit: blue M1134 Stryker ATGM(Aim9Sidewinder2020) has hit red Su-25T(=DDCS=Hawkeye) with BGM-71 TOW - +15 M1134 Stryker ATGM has given 15 to Aim9Sidewinder2020 on 2, Total: { blueRSPoints: 615 } SYNCING|R2|1021:1020

Well as a pilot DCS comes pretty damn close to the real thing. If DCS simulates turbulence properly and humidity we would see even better immersion. The issue with sins and IRL is there are no forces acting upon your body. So you are missing allot of input the aircraft would give you. Anyways it’s physics , it’s numbers, you absolutely can make a sim act exactly as it would IRL. It will never feel right because they can’t simulate forces acting on your body.

If you have ground units or statics placed on farp pads they spawn inside the pads. track included. ground units spawn in pad.trk

Can't figure out the reason but it's crashing all the clients in multiplayer. tracks attached. dcs.log-20200604-081815.zip

The S3B Tankers bingo fuel is wrong I believe. In the track I have some F18s to bring the tankers to bingo. They will stop tanking and attempt to RTB. By the time the tanker reaches the final threshold on the runway it ejects. The carrier tanker doesn't make it anywhere near a friendly base and ejects. Mission Attached. Track attached showing the one over the runway threshold ejecting. I used time fast forward to test this. Refule Test.miz Tanker bug.trk

Logs attached showing client crashes caused by rearming and a client leaving a server after the rearming process is finished. I was unable to reproduce. dcs.log-20200526-191733.zip dcs.log-20200526-192526.zip dcs.log-20200526-191747.zip dcs.log-20200526-191749.zip

DCS 2.5.6.49718 Open Beta: While hosting. have 2 other clients join a server. have them fire a tow and then hit the rearm command. once the rearming is finished have the client disconnect while in the unit. It then boots the server host out of a CA unit. server-20200526-144857.trk

Workaround is simply spawning them backwards. Set carrier to late activation and vis. before activation. Then deactivate carrier group if you don't need it.

If you have a carrier set to delayed activation with static units attached. the carrier will spawn but the static units will spawn inside the carrier sea level. track attached demonstrating. 60 second mark carrier spawns. ship static unit bug.trk

looks like it happens every time. logs attached dcs.log-20200520-230717.zip dcs.log-20200520-230424.zip dcs.log-20200520-230042.zip

DCS 2.5.6.49314 Open Beta Rearm Crash still there. crash log with track attached dcs.log-20200520-212851.zip

it’s not necessarily a discussion of balance. DCS lacks any use of such a weapon because ED has not yet developed SAM AI. Bumping the RC up would at least present challenge. Otherwise what’s the point of using it knowing it will kill the target 99% of the time. Doesn’t even allow for human error.

Because it’s going to be a year maybe 2 until we see ED give us Sam AI.

I appreciate the reply but yes we have been tinkering with it quite a bit. Apart from removing the LD10s completely we would hope for an adjustment to their RC values. Adding more radars doesn’t really present much of a challenge to human players with no heavy scripting or server limiting amounts of Radar dishes. Until ED pump out improved ai and Sam traps it’s just too easy to sead with these weapons.