HungaroJET

No problemo senores :thumbup: Just open up the .dll files and the .exe > We will get a whole new world :smartass:

Gorgeous model :thumbup:

4xmpl: We need a joint/bounded effect to F-16.cmd files to show F16-SRYW-L.cmd and F16-SRYW-R.cmd (F-16 vapuors) @ x,y,z coords (of aircraft) when Gs higher than 5-6Gs. If then Arg0 must run 0.01 to 0.99 (again and again) and dissapears when Gs lower than 5-6 Gs. That's it. Easy ! but only in .dll files :( Result: Vapour fogs will weaving backward in FC2/DCS :thumbup: (wont as homogeneous like in Flanker2) I dont have antialiasing with ModelViewer. I have no idea why :(

some simple little thing that ED would do it NO it is not ! There are many fuselage vapour 3D .cmd files in Shapes folder for left and right side of fuselage: 4xmpl: F15-SRYW-L.cmd, F15-SRYW-R.cmd and more for F-16, F-18, MiG-29, Su-25, Su-27, Su-33 Arg0 moves the vapour effect (waves) backward on these 3D .cmd vapour models. I think nice enough, so ask ED to put it back @ aircrafts. It's easy for Them but not for us :( Flanker2 (2.5) used these vapour models ! These Vapour fogs a little plastic in Flanker2 but the 3D models of DCS are different. The skins/textures of the vapor are nicer, looks like redesigned, but unused in FC2/DCS :( Also interesting: Flanker2 use this option - if player put 4 or 6 AIM-7 Sparrows to Tomcat then Phoenix rails are not visible. How ? This is also missing from FC2/DCS :( Shame http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=53943

This Vapour (fuselage) Effect is a long story :cry: Almost 5 years old. ...& nothing changed :mad: only A-10C got new wingtip effect :baby: http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?p=215704&highlight=vapour#post215704

Howbout' this ? http://milviz.com/modeldetail.php?type=1&id=AV-8B# or this ? http://milviz.com/modeldetail.php?type=1&id=F-111F :thumbup:

Great ! So is it 3D (.lom) ? or just edited/modified draw (.bmp) ? What do you mean "working" ? All Switches, Buttons, Rotaries, Handles, Pedals ? Just like "Cockpit-Ka-50.lom" ? That will be really Fantastic !

Here come some old pics from DCSBS...

I think these are the biggest/hardest problems of DCS & E.D.: Radar modes and two seaters/multiplayers :cry: ...and the classification (F-15E) :(

...and will you implement BLU-108 for CBU-97/105 ? - a new CBU model with Arg3 (to rotate) with moving/loose covers (skin opens) ? - 10 BLU-108 with doubled parachute (new 3D model?) - 40 spining skeets with ability to search targets and destroy vehicles like a missile (pinpoint) ? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fkVZnRQ1Ao0

What about Spanish Harrier ? I know we have different version in FC2/DCS but would be great for Spain too anyway :thumbup: http://www.airliners.net/photo/Spain---Navy/McDonnell-Douglas-EAV-8B/1726056/L/

corrected pylons and adapters

Please make skin(s) for Chinook too :thumbup: http://www.airliners.net/photo/Australia---Air/Boeing-Vertol-CH-47C/1177345/L/&sid=170943d7d46ab30c6b28385a919d8b21

Sounds interesting :thumbup: Show us that 365 :music_whistling: ways :sorcerer::worthy:

If you are making a new Su-33 model which has same size, ground (tyre) points and wingtips coordinates! then you will see moving missiles @ wingtip. Of course you must use Arg8 for fold wings. I dont really know how wingtips works in .cmd files but i repositioned the factory Su-33.cmd wingtip coords. This coords (differ from original) good for R-73 but not for (Sorbcija.cmd) ECM pod. Problem: R-73 diameter differ from Sorbcija diameter (larger) but program use the center coords of models so ECM pods reach wings while R-73 only the wingtip rails. So if someone is making new Sorbcija pods, he needs to make two -for left and for right wings too with different coords of the model using these Su-33 pilon coords: pylon(1, 0, -2.073000, 0.150600, -7.283800, pylon(12, 0, -2.073000, 0.150600, 7.283800, Otherwise R-73 wont connect to wingtip rails correctly. LOM is different like F/A-18A There is a ConList in the .lom file (connector list) which tells coordinates of pylons and lights so if you named the wingtip pilons to hardponit-1 and hardpoint-9 in the new .lom 3d object then program will move weapons with wingtip hardpoint coordinates if you fold wings. ED's F-18A hardpoint-1 coords: (-2.071,0.0280006,-5.822) right wingtip hardpoint-9 coords: (-2.071,0.0279998,5.822) left wingtip ED's F-18C hardpoint-1 coords: (-2.071,0.028,-5.822) ! hardpoint-9 coords: same as in F-18A.lom Does not matter what you write into F-18A, F-18C.lua the plyon coordinates used from .lom file not from this .lua file if the model is LOM. So if you make a new LOM model with moving pilons (F-111, Tornado too) you need to use hardpoint-x names for these pilons DCSW is differ moreover. For pilon positions there is a row in F-18C.lua: use_full_connector_position = true, if this option true program will use the pilon coords from .lom file if this option false program will use the pilon coords from .lua file - just like in FC2 with .cmd models so lets hope we will get this "use_full_connector_position" option in the merged (after compatibility patch) DCSW/FC2 coz DCSBS/FC2 does not able to use now this option/command by the program (by .dll files) Wrong F-18 pilon coords in FC2: you can see here http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=57093&highlight=pylon

...WIP Fishbeds in DCS/FC2

This is not a joke Blaze...ask ED :D Yes, with Su-27 Pit from FC2 fun Fun FUN :joystick: Added SnakeEye (and more) ... yes it works ;)

Maybe...:D Pssst, ALL flyable (F-15E too) :surrender: As i repeated few days ago: everything is possible in DCS (by GGTharos) and Beta code is the best type of code (EtherealN) but plz do not kill me for this info :P Yes i know: poor detail @ screenshots...i must buy a new High-End PC :mad: Checking High ALT Checking High SPD Droping EFT before... ...checking High Gs :D Oopsy, i made too much dust :) ...but i prefer the fresh air in Tbilisi (Yep...checking High Air Pressure :D )

Hm, good news for all ;) so does it mean that we will never get an Alpha gift ? :hehe: :crash: :devil_2:

Hey Bucic :) There is no DCS anymore :smilewink: Just DCS+W and DCS+BS, but i understand your answer. Choose 8 or 10 Renato ! I wanted to add more choices but iv got only 10 choices for this poll. Choose 8 or 9 ;) Another choices: 11. I'm not interested in DCSWb at all. :cry: I want a Frogfoot :joystick: 12. I have DCSBS only. :worthy: I want an Apache :pilotfly: 13. I bought DCSWb coz it's the next Gen DCS. DCSW will the future. :director: 14. Im f**king rich, so i bought DCSWb just for a try :idiot: 15. I bought DCSWb coz i wanted to see how .edm models will look like :doh: 16. I bought DCSWb coz im living in Vegas/Tbilisi and i want to bomb my neighbour's home :smartass: 17. I bought DCSWb coz i wanted to be a Tester :devil_2: and so on...

Please read ALL choices carefully before Your choice/answer ;) TY

here: http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=63667 TY

here: http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=63667 TY

I'm just curious, maybe ED also ;)

F-111F from Flanker2. :( Old cmd model, but cool in online missions, especially with flyable slot :smilewink: Should be great a new edm model for DCSW :thumbup: Just like this: http://www.milviz.com/modeldetail.php?type=1&id=F-111F