-
Posts
53 -
Joined
-
Last visited
About ExNusquam
- Birthday June 11
Personal Information
-
Flight Simulators
DCS, MSFS
-
Location
United States
-
Interests
PC Gaming, Fencing
Recent Profile Visitors
The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.
-
That doesn't work in MP - I have no way of presetting CMS settings if the mission designer hasn't done it already.
-
I believe there has been a change where CMDS_ALE47.lua isn't loaded into the aircraft. Custom CMDS files are now broken.
-
I don't know if this has been reported already, so posting it here for tracking. If there are two clients spawned in on Elevator 2 (the 2 first spots that are taken when spawning), the deck crew will be unable to taxi them unless one aircraft releases their slot and respawns. Observed behavior is: -Both clients spawn, salute once and proceed through startup. -After selecting salute a second time, both aircraft will receive the message "Awaiting Requested Crew Member", which will not clear. The Deck Crew highlight will appear over the yellow shirt in front of the aircraft, however he will not direct the aircraft. -If one client changes slots, the other will immediately receive taxi instructions from the yellow shirt. No track available due to lengthy/large multiplayer mission, however behavior has been observed before:
-
I absolutely agree, and would happily accept some compromises for the sake of compatibility with other modules. However, we have excellent sources for how it should work for the Hornet - hence why I'm reporting it. I'd like bombs that at least something predictable (like go high-order with reasonable settings applied).
-
I note that this got moved out of the Hornet forum (put there for specific avionics refs for the Hornet) - is there a status on this (reported, WAD, under investigation?)
-
Mike Force Team started following ExNusquam
-
Writing up a series of conditions that document the FMU-139 is not functioning correctly, and the avionics interfaces within the F/A-18C do not match expected behavior. Tracks are attached for all conditions. Source for all of this is here: https://www.fighterpilotpodcast.com/post/understanding-the-fmu-139-and-its-employment-options - Source description "This unclassified article was originally penned in 2008 for inclusion into a classified Navy tactics periodical. Various grammatical changes have been made to change the tense of the text from what was expected to happen in 2008 to what is now known over a decade later." This is a fantastic source that is unclassified, publicly released, and includes avionics depictions that is contemporaneous to our F/A-18C. Condition 1: A/C Loaded with 1xLGB and 1xJDAM, each with an FMU-139 set to 10s ARM Delay and INST Function time Expected Behavior: Both weapons should have either EFUZ w/INST/DLY1 as options, ARM function should give options for either 5.5s or 10s. Alternate: MFUZ Option with OFF/TAIL options. ARM function should give 6s/7s/10s/14s/20s options Observed behavior: JDAM shows EFUZ w/INST/DLY1 as options, ARM function is not usable, JPF Page/Function was incorrectly available (Showing 14s Arm Time), however the weapon honored the 10s arm time (went High-Order after 12s TOF). Dud cues honored 10s time set on loadout page. LGB incorrectly displayed EFUZ w/INST/DLY1/DLY2 options, no Arm Function. Condition 2: A/C Loaded with 1xLGB and 1xJDAM, each with an FMU-139 set to 14s ARM Delay and 10ms Function time Expected Behavior: Both weapons should have MFUZ (EFUZ not valid for arm times >10s) with OFF/TAIL, Arm function should give 6s/7s/10s/14s/20s options. Weapon should execute 10ms delay on function. Weapon should go High-Order with specified function time with TAIL boxed. Alternate: if EFUZ must be used, weapon should go High-Order at specified function with DLY1, and on contact with INST selected. Observed behavior: JDAM incorrectly shows EFUZ w/INST/DLY1, ARM function not usable, JPF Page/Function was incorrectly available (Showing 14s Arm time). Weapon went High-Order with INST selected (not correct for this Arm Time selection) but duded with DLY1 boxed. Condition 3: JDAM with FMU-139 10s Arm Delay and INST Function Time, DSU-33 Expected Behavior: EFUZ Option with INST and VT1 as options. INST should function on contact and VT1 should function as airburst. Alternate: MFUZ with OFF/TAIL options. Airburst always functions. Observed Behavior: EFUZ option incorrectly shows VT1/INST/DLY1. Arm Function is not usable. VT1 results in weapon dud (incorrect), INST executes airburst (incorrect), DLY1 duds weapon. Condition 4: JDAM with FMU-139 14s/INST Plugged Extended TOF Expected Behavior: With EFUZ option (FFCS Mode), JDAM should have TOF limit of either 60s or 240s. With MFUZ (FZU Mode) JDAM should have unlimited TOF. Observed Behavior: JDAM fails to go high-order for TOF of 139s. Need further testing to verify what actual TOF limit is (but it's clearly not one of the expected ones) Condition_1.trk Condition_2.trk Condition_3.trk Condition_4.trk
-
Per title. Selecting the HUD Attitude Selector Switch to "STBY" should remove the Velocity Vector, display a fixed "W" for the waterline, and HUD attitude information should match the Standby Attitude Indicator. The DDI ADI page correctly matches the attitude information provided by the Standby Attitude Indicator, even with a variety of attitude excursions. standby INS bug.trk
-
Agreed - this would be very helpful.
- 1 reply
-
- 1
-
-
Our squadron has been using this for a while, it's a great little program:
-
reported Entering TWS Auto Breaks Antenna Elevation
ExNusquam replied to ExNusquam's topic in Bugs and Problems
1 Week Bump. Can we get a status/tag on this? -
Entering TWS Auto will remove ability to control antenna elevation. To replicate: 1. STT on contact 2. Enter TWS via PB10(Automatically selects TWS AUTO) 3. Observe no antenna elevation control 4. Select RWS via PB5 5. Observe antenna elevation control not regained in RWS. Track attached. antenna_elevation_bug.trk
-
Resurrecting this thread, per standard aircraft characteristics for the AGM-84A, a declassified document from 1974, Harpoon should cruise at 50-200' before executing it's terminal maneuver. http://www.alternatewars.com/SAC/AGM-84A_Harpoon_SAC_-_August_1974.pdf
-
Check OS Elevation. You're looking below the target, when terrain elevation is ~700M.
-
ExNusquam changed their profile photo
-
There is a minor error in the hook bypass switch logic. If the switch is in Carrier, and the hook is down, the switch will not be held in Field. However, if the switch is in Field, and the hook is lowered, the switch is not released to Carrier. If the hook is ever down the bypass switch should no longer be held in Field. Track attached. bypass_bug.trk
-
If dropped below minimum altitude, the Harpoon will self-destruct after ~25 seconds, despite successfully transitioning to cruise flight. This appears to only occur if the HARM stabilizes fairly low altitude (<300'). If employed such that it stabilizes at a higher altitude (but still below cruise altitude) the missile will level off and transit to the target as planned. I'm not aware of any documentation for a Harpoon self-destructing before it reaches programmed destruct range. Track attached. HPD Self-Destruct.trk
-
- 1
-