Jump to content

scommander2

Members
  • Posts

    1204
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by scommander2

  1. A quick question about core parking disabling on Windows 11: does it mean dcs.exe run on P and E cores with no restriction for the render cores (or, okay with the common cores. My understanding the IO cores should be in E-cores)? Thanks.
  2. Thanks for the comment. I am seeking the possible configurations for a desktop.
  3. Thanks for all comments. My goal is to maintain that DCS runs 60 FPS (hope I am not greedy) constantly. I have tried Process Lasso/ParkControl to unpark all my cores and all P-core affinity is with DCS on my current system, and I still feel lagging somehow. A better hardware environment maybe relief the resource usages.
  4. Hi @The_Nephilim, thanks for the comment. I do have a 4K monitor (3840 x 2160 at 144 Hz and I am not VR ready yet).
  5. Hi, To make DCS runs smoothly without disabling/relaxing (not extreme) DCS settings, I have few questions? 1. Get good/excellent GPU is most important? (i.e. RTX5090, or AMD 9070XT) 2. Get more CPU cores (for Intel, more P-Cores as possible) are important even though having the good/excellent GPU? Or, not critical since the good/excellent GPU will take the most UI rendering? Thanks.
  6. Yes, we have these two points in our list , thanks for mentioning them.
  7. some sort of penalty for over-stressing the airframe and for landing over-weight So, the above wording is okay for entering our wish list section or any suggestion? Thanks.
  8. Yup, BRSIT with the WCS lock and we can break the lock after firing. It is "truly fire and forgot" according to the HB F-14 manual @ AIM-54 ACM active
  9. Yes, I made the target in the flood area based on ADL possible according to the HB F-14 manual (Boresight Mode section) according to Tacview. However, it does not mean that I am always lucky to shoot a target.
  10. Tried ACM/BRSIT with MiG-29 x 2 around 6nm:
  11. Without a WCS track, is it a case?
  12. Thanks!! - [ADDED]Weight added for weapons rails in the ME case {https://forum.dcs.world/topic/349953-f-14-ab-feature-follow-up-wish-list-and-beyond/page/12/#findComment-5613957} Added in the wish list section.
  13. Trying to read/understand the wish list item 2 and 3, where we are so far? About the item 3, is it for the ME case? Thanks.
  14. - [ADDED]With hot refueling procedure and right engine has to be shut down and the ground crew operation and comms - "unable to comply" with right engine running {https://forum.dcs.world/topic/349953-f-14-ab-feature-follow-up-wish-list-and-beyond/page/11/#findComment-5613297 https://forum.dcs.world/topic/349953-f-14-ab-feature-follow-up-wish-list-and-beyond/page/11/#findComment-5613707} added into the wish list section.
  15. Okay, switch back to the matters of F-14 but nothing else. Shall we?
  16. @Zabuzard, thanks for comment and it helps. However.... can we think about something in F-14B(U) for making up in the future? Thanks.
  17. Added the following item into the "TODO" section: - [ADDED]Provide the same amount of the mouse button bindable options in F-4E for F-14 {https://forum.dcs.world/topic/349953-f-14-ab-feature-follow-up-wish-list-and-beyond/page/11/#findComment-5613460} Hope it covers more mouse button bindable options not just one for today and asks more for tomorrow.
  18. I would like to wait a bit for if we have no more update for these three wish lists
  19. Thanks for the suggestion, and I did try the teleport option with no response
  20. To break F-14 flaps is kind easy... and it is a DCS official mod....
  21. Okay, thanks!! With this solution should get my following issue resolved:
  22. How about a new key bind in the supercarrier to release the looping logic for the deck crew manually?
×
×
  • Create New...