scommander2

It is a wish list at:

Hi, I think that it will be nice to have the AI wingmen to report their own status from the fighter command menu. the main status likes: fuel weapon countermeasures anything else?? So, the leader can decide what AI wingmen should do in the next step. Any suggestion? Thanks.

I am wondering if DCS core feature can provide the AI wingman status, such as: weapon, fuel, counter measurements... etc through the fighter commands.

I am wondering what the tooltip says if the mouse cursor is on top of the red exclamation mark.

I concur and I need that kind of power to boost up not only AI objects but also terrains.

A nice video about 5090 cooling:

There is a very very old posting about nozzle at:

Wow... thanks!!

Thanks for the reply and sharing. Saying 6 or 8 P-Cores (no-hyperthreading) for DCS, is it good enough for the DCS task load (meaning no FPS drop or whatever)?

Hi, My understanding is about Intel E-cores are for processing the lightweight/daemon processes that running in the backend. and the E-cores are not meant for the heavy task and high performance. Question: the latest Intel CPUs have more E-cores than P-Cores (no-hyperthreading), what are the impacts to the DCS MT performance? Thanks.

Which Nvidia app version supports the feature? Thanks.

Checked with the F-14B cockpit: The piece of something was here when HB modeled it from the plane, and I guess that it does not have balance at left and right so makes it likes a real used equipment (I am not sure and I may be wrong sorry).

A fun video about RTX, enjoy!!

Is there a dependency required by hardware? Thanks.

FYI: just in case that the power management may cause the stutter happened sometimes due to some of P-Cores are parked...

Oh... gee... Never pay attention to that piece of something shown in photo 1....

Quoted from Nvidia.com for the RTX 50 family: Due to DLSS4: So, the family of the RTX 50 can perform faster than RTX 40 family. Question: can DCS run on DLSS4?

It was not extremely expensive for 5090.

Unfortunately, the answer is "No"

It is a good question. I have had an issue for the FPS drop since 2.9.8.1214 even all P/E-Cores were unparked. So, is the recent release better the earlier releases for MT? If yes, it is the good news then. Thanks.

Hi @jackd, will it be kindly to let me know when/how DCS will go the black screen? Thanks.

Hi @pimp and @freehand, can I know which DCS release version after is no longer needed Process Lasso? Thanks.

There are lots of YouTube videos for AH-64D, and I found the following channel contains "fast & easy" for AH-64D: (327) Callsign Grimey - YouTube His videos do help for me a lots!!

Hi, I am not sure that the cloud rendering is the known issue or not. Thanks.

Personally, I think that it is a good benefits to use Process Lasso to tune CPU/Process usage. especially for Intel 12th+ gen family. SP has his YouTube video for how he gets this environment improvement with DCS "2.9" at: With Process Lasso, we can make CPU affinity with all P-Cores for dcs.exe so that DCS multi-threading can leverage the heavy process cores to generate a better FPS. I had done the testing on my Intel 13th gen CPU with Process Lasso at: Because of Windows Power management, Windows kernel may not schedule all available CPUs for DCS when DCS needs more CPU resources to compute the objects and FPS (likes F10 map and others). So Process Lasso can take care for us, if we do not have time to manage CPU/process. A good Process Lasso setup will make DCS runs smoothly in MT, otherwise it becomes totally chaos since DCS 2.9+ (I guess for troubleshooting and ED wants to know we run Process Lasso runs in background or not).