Mizzy

Haha, I am up for that, maybe not a pint thought unless it's a pint of wine . Actually this is an interesting point, I doubt any of us would be so argumentative if we all met in the real world. Online forums are not representative of our personal character, so let's not be too harsh with each other, it's not people's real character represented in forum posts. I seldom play DCS these days but the Mig 29 may change that Mizzy

Have you thought your posts are simply antagonistic and without a shred of official evidence against ED or even evidence to support Zambrano? As for the very poor excuse that you can't answer my post because you have received penalty points, let me tell you, if you have received penalties that is a private matter, read the forum rules! If you wish to answer me, make it factual and only cite official statements. I am not interested in your unwaning support for Zambrano unless you have official support from him, do you understand !

You mean we are still waiting to hear if Zambrano has fulfilled his obligations under the agreement. Remember the problem was caused by him in the first place, read the opening post. However, ED has stated the agreement is confidential and you don't quite grasp the concept of what 'confidential' means.

I have just watched the most amazing game of football with England's Lionesses against Spain, real bad ass football, sorry, where was I. oh yes I remember, some of you just have far too much time on your hands. How long did it take you to write all that drivel ? I'm only kidding Mizzy

I will answer this for you, read the post above and stop being a nuisance.

Exactly, it is not an official announcement from Zambrano (Razbam) about anything to do with this dispute. Move along Citizens, nothing to see here officially ! Mizzy Indeed Nothing official, so no. Miz

In your opinion

It's already been stated in the first post what will happen to the Razbam modules regardless of outcome. It only affects the F15E, or rather, it affects the F15E much more that the others because bugger all was being done with them before the dispute. Hope this helps. Miz

Yes, but not anything to do with Razbam. I personally feel Razbam are well and truly out of the equation for developing anything again in DCS and the hope for a good outcome is Razbam leave DCS on good terms, whatever that may entail. Mizzy

Unfortunately wounds that have been left to infest don't heal. In this case, amputation is the healer. Agreed Also agreed Agreed Your post has merit You have repeated this many times, we get the message. I would like the Mig 23 but not by Razbam and I am not alone.

So is it Razbam that are holding things up ?

"They are totally different era anyway so not comparable". Galinette I agree with him, you can't, even on a simulation basis unless the F15E has the same radar as say the F18 or 16. To say one radar is more accurate has to be from the same starting point and that is what I am meaning. Agree to disagree eh ! Mizzy Ahh, that's nice.

And you picked up on my point, I didn't hide it very well ! You can't compare radar's in DCS and it is ridiculous to do so, tell your friend Timghetta that, he doesn't seem to comprehend this point. I must clarify a point made by Timgetta: "it was Razbam who coded the cockpit, with one of the best radars in game. Far more accurate than other aircraft inside DCS." it's more of a point of 'I like my radar better than yours' and disrespectful to other 3rd Party developers who's radars may well be far more accurate than the one mentioned. Anyway, it's OT and I have asked for the offending post to be removed as being subjective, offensive and Off Topic. Mizzy just checking if it was the same person

I do apologise, it was the word 'within' I missed the 'in' bit, not to worry it's not important. As to attributing development credit, looks like Razbam got all the credit for your work from your friend Timghetta (Razbam being the trade name for Zambrano) and not you. I personally would be very upset about that. Timghetta said: "it was Razbam who coded the cockpit, with one of the best radars in game. Far more accurate than other aircraft inside DCS." Is he saying you didn't ? I'm confused. I can't comment as I don't have the F15e module, is it better than the F-5, my favourite? Anyway, we are getting off topic. Mizzy Agreed

No, it's my fault, when I use the term 'Razbam' it means 'Zambrano' and Zambrano doesn't do anything other than publish the product and I don't really care who did what as it's muddied the waters yet again. I didn't ask you the question but I will respond to your last comment. From the first post: "It is our commitment that no matter what happens we will do our best to make sure these continue to work into the future. We understand those of you who remember losing the Hawk, this is not something we intend to do again." You are getting confused with Razbam (Zambrano) continuing to update and internally fix his published modules out of early access (which he wasn't doing anyway) that's your point and EDs commitment to fix any issues that break the module in DCS, my point, they are two very different entities. In other words, ED will keep the module working in DCS (all 4 of them, the SA map has nothing to do with Razbam) for as long as they can in the state they were left in after early access. This is my point when people say they will lose all 4 modules, they won't and if people would care to read the first post, they would not be asking the question. Tavo89 "Clearly the legal dispute doesn't let you see beyond that, take some time to investigate about the projects that were planned, they are much more than a simple Mig-19. And about badmouthing RB people leave it to yourself, it doesn't help." I am not interested in what would have been or what was planned, Zambrano planned a lot of things that never materialised and not just for this sim ! As for 'badmouthing' Razbam, go over to his Discord and see what they say about ED, utterly disgraceful and it certainly has not helped Zambrano for allowing such behaviour on his official Discord. Mizzy