Jump to content

Cunning_Raven

Members
  • Posts

    74
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Cunning_Raven

  1. Maybe not insults, but this is getting ridiculous. This is the third topic about this, and the conclusion is always the same. The only people who want to remove the cfts are the people that like airquake and don't realize that this plane was made mainly for low level strikes, and not for air to air. The USA has other planes for that.
  2. Are we still talking about this? Jesus, people are so stupid..
  3. This is the third time now.
  4. Can we just lock this topic before it get's out of hand?
  5. Maybe they were talking about a two-ship of F-15s? That's be entirely possible, if you can carry 3x GBU-28s, of course
  6. I'm gonna be living off that video and the two pictures of the eurofighter for a while haha
  7. I see, I don't know why I thought that there's an integrated FLIR haha. Thank you for the info!
  8. Same, even though I'm trying to except much later, I was really sad that it didn't make an appearance. And when they were replying to Eurofighter comments, it really sounded like it is not close at all.
  9. Hello there! I've been thinking about this for a while. On the top of the Eurofighter's UFC, there are five buttons and one of them says "Flir", even on the german variants. What does it do? Is it like the F15E"s nav pod?
  10. Well. they didn't specify which timezone. It's still 4 pm here (Jan 4th)
  11. No, we are getting the Captor-M
  12. Yeah, that's the point of the MAW. It detects the infared signiture of the missile launch and it warns the pilot, or something like that.
  13. I'm hoping to see the eurofighter, but I assume Heatblur won't let ED show it. They said that they'll only show anything about it when it's almost ready. And also that we'll only see stuff from them. But a man can always dream.
  14. Well, back then, you didn't kill the enemy but your bullets did Sorry, I'm gonna leave now
  15. That's nice to hear! I guess the sources I looked at weren't too good. I don't even care about the LWRs, but the rear MAW is pretty important
  16. Dear Cobra, Thank you for the response, sorry if I sounded rude or urging, I didn't mean to. I'm very happy that Oliver posted it. And as you said, he's doing an amazing job! Even though the picture is blurred, I can see what everything is. The lighting is my favourite! I'm gonna keep waiting patiently for news, just take your time. Best regards Raven
  17. It's clearly different. Miltech's picture is very blurry, but you can see that it's a different angle. And their picture has the HMD activated. That's the green blob in the middle.
  18. Uhh, I think that picture is a joke haha
  19. Isn't that a picture from Wikipedia? MT5's picture looks like it was shot at night with lots of cockpit lighting, and the angle was also a bit different. I hope it's gonna look this good, though!
  20. Yeah, I don't know how I feel about it. I'm happy with anything we get, but couldn't it have a little better resolution? And now this picture is the "Cover picture" of Miltech on facebook alongside the bo-105.
  21. Honestly, reading Nahen's stupidity is kind of entertaining..
  22. Yeah, the person who made the cockpit works for Truegritt and Miltech-5, which is a one man team. So yeah, everything makes ense now
×
×
  • Create New...