Daerchanar

Don't know if you misunderstood or not, I wasn't answering to you, but to OP. I know that the modding tools are not available, so I agree with OP that terrain modding is desperately needed in DCS.

Thanks

Agreed, the terrain modding is badly needed in DCS.

The "one number fits all" idea that DCS uses one single number for all sides might just fall short. Yes, the model is very simplified, but we only have one side of it, that is, the config file with the RCS values. What people are not considering is that the underlining hardcoded calculation might have some clever, albeit simplified, algorithms that multiplies that basic RCS value, whatever it is, to a given ratio according the plane's angle. If one compares any given numbers of RCS signatures for fighter aircrafts, it becomes quite clear that there is pattern, something like 0 and 180 are usually about 1/2 that of 270 and 90 degrees.

I vote for a Gulf War map!

Sorry thanks, but that was not the question.

Does wireless headphones interfere with Pico 4's wireless performance?

Very nice setup, but that cabling problem of yours!

If they are delaying (twice) the pre-order, I can't imagine how it will be with the release proper. Uff

There's a lot of potential indeed but I'm afraid ED has its hands tied by its business model. Perhaps one thing that came to mind, completely unrelated, would be a "DCS Season Pass Bundle" subscription like option, to untie some resources from new modules sales. Gonna ask ChatGPT what he thinks about that.

Thanks, you're really very kind and generous.

This poll is not a petition thread nor a wishlist. Nobody's asking anything here.

I can confirm, the problem is still there.

No need for insults.

The point is only to gather the general opinion, regardless of outcome.

Removable CFT or not?