gonvise

Hello, I understand that you are referring to the "+" versions, and not any of these that allow use via link cable. And on the other hand, It's working well for you the wired ethernet cable + USB-adapter to connect to the Quest? I would like to test with VD without having to reassemble the Wifi-6 router.

Well, you could have started there ;-)... and it's not that I have my opinion, I don't want to be right or wrong, if you can advise me something that improves performance or even quality, I'll be happy to try it and even more happy that it works. That's why I opened this post.

It's very difficult to get anything positive out of these types of posts when you are able to say things like that without even having tested it. Do you think I'm putting those values because I'm a teenager (with all due respect to my teenage son ;-)) who has a 4090 and I want to go around saying that I put 2 for supersampling? I'm an engineer with more than 30 years of experience, in hardware and software, and I assure you that I spend more hours testing this type of things than flying the simulator itself. If I say that my supersampling value is 2.0, it's because I've tested 1.9 and I notice a worse difference. If I say that, currently, I hardly notice ghosting with ASW, it's because it is like that, since it keeps improving with each version (although others think it isn't like that). I also "thought" that putting 2 was an outrage, but when I put it, I almost cried, the image quality that it achieves with the lenses of the Questo Pro is incredible. I'm attaching my queadview.log if you want us to start the typical resolution discussion to see "who has the biggest one", but for me it's the opposite, it's a matter of what we see on the screen. I understand that if you think I'm crazy for putting that SS, you've tried it, right? It's very simple; I put 2.0 in the ODT because the slider in the meta application itself only lets me put 1.5. And I've tried 1.6, 1.7, 1.8 and 1.9... and the best quality that my eyes perceive is 2. That's it. Of course, then I put ASW, because with that SS, even with a 4090 it's impossible to maintain 90FPS. And I use ASW, because, nowadays, it's almost magical, and combined with the new DLSS 4 (I only use DLAA), I've even realized that the little ghosting I had was caused by DLSS 3 DLAA. These posts always end the same. Lessons about resolutions and why "mine is better than everyone else's". But I've tried everything you say, I've tried VD, I've tried lowering SS, I've tried with and without ASW, and if you tell me to try something that can improve what I have, I will do it, I won't go around saying things like my SS 2.0 is "absurd and hilarious" or that ASW reprojection is wrecking my image, because my visual perception say it's not, and if you say that it's simply because you likely haven't tried to test it or simply the quest pro lenses are superior to the Quest 3. Quad-Views-Foveated.log

Sorry, but in your last two posts it doesn't seem like you're reading me!! ;-)... I've already stated the CPU and GPU I have, I've already said twice that my SS/PD is 2, I don't even want to try 1.2. With this supersampling (2.0), I need reprojection, not even with a 4090 would I get 90FPS in most scenarios, which is what I'm looking for. 72 FPS, simply, my eyes notice it and I perceive the screen slightly flickering. It's clear that with your configuration, I don't doubt that you have proven that VD works better for you than cable link, but I'm telling you that with SS/PD 2.0 and reprojection, my tests in VD were a sea of stutters compared to cable link. Understand me, we're talking about different configurations and expectations.

Ok, and the reprojection has improved? it is comparable to ASW?

Sure!

Hello @Fiztex, I've read your post about VD, and really, there's nothing I'd like more than VD giving me the same (or better) quality and fluidity that the Quest Pro gives me with Cable Link. This past year I've already tried twice VD and try to stick with it, in May and October, with an Asus Wifi 6 dedicated router, 4090, Questo Pro, 7800x3D, but neither time (different versions of VD) have I managed to get close to the quality mentioned. There have been other posts about it, and the conclusion reached is that yes, VD is very good software, and with normal configurations it can improve Cable Link (perhaps, or so you say). But with SS/PD levels, like in my case, x2, it's impossible for me to reach the same quality and fluidity as with cable link. In your comment, I see that you talk about PD at 1.1 or 1.2 (AKA Super Sampling), but I'm talking about 2.0 via Oculus Tool With that level of SS, the Quest Pro looks almost like on a HD monitor, and with the meta ASW, I just have to keep it at 45 to have a smooth experience. Can you tell me your experience and how you have configured VD to work better than the link cable with that super sample (2.0)? And please, from the other post, this is not a war, I really want to be able to have the best configuration I can have, and "I want to believe" in VD ;-), but I have not achieved it (Neither I nor many other people who want to use SS levels > 1.5), using the VD "god like" and raising the bitrate, as you say, to 900, but...: 1. VD reprojection is not as good as meta's ASW. 2. No matter how much I increase the encoding speed, it is always somewhat more bluried than with cable link. 3. Stutters, and more stutters in VD. 4. Quad Views doesn't work in VD (has this changed?) in Quest Pro (with eye tracking) Quad Views are magical, and the performance increment is very significant, and allows me to raise the SS to values like 2. All the best!

Sorry to disagree, but I think saying that the cable link is "abandonware" is very, very far from the truth. That the "god like" of Virtual Desktop is enough for you in your configuration seems very good to me, but with quest pro cable link, 900Mbps and, above all, supersampling x2 via OT, crisp and smooth like silk graphics... VD "god like" doesn't even come close, and if I try match SS2x resolution in VD, it's a stutterfest. Sorry, but no.

For me the version that is downloaded is still 7.1, we will have to wait for it to refresh.

Yes, that effect is perfect, thanks!

OK, working in VR, I think I tried 7.1 with VREM disabled in addons. Effect areas (cockpit,external) also working. Would it be possible to have an effect for HDR, contrast, or something similar? My goal is to darken the cockpit compared to the outside.

Please @lefuneste01, Tell me exactly the options because with so much testing I'm going crazy ;-). First, we are testing the VREM effects directly in reshade; from the VREM add-ons page, they work, but from the reshade effects start page, the effect is not displayed in VR, but it is in 2D...ok? I have installed reshade and your VREM mod above. In addons page, are correct these options or is necessary activate DCS VREM although we are testing VREM effects in reshade? And in start page, I'm testing only with this effect. And if it doesn't work, you need: 1. Reshade.log 2. Restart. install Shader hunter mod, F1 in cockpit, and Reshade.log. Is it all like this? Thanks for your work.

Sorry, no luck, stand alone reshade VREM effect noy shows in VR... attached reshade.log with shader hunter https://we.tl/t-2y7j2b6OrD

310.2.1.0 is not in DLLS Swaper at the moment. Have any of you tried the K preset of the new drivers that is supposed to improve the J?

Is posible use DLSS Swaper for DCS?

Ok, VREM disabled, restarted and... https://we.tl/t-OubtypRvg6

OK, reshade (text unnoficial at start), mod and shader hunter in bin-mt, load mission, cockpit, F1... log > 100Mb, https://we.tl/t-9UyR4L9zT1

With Reshade and ShaderHunter in bin-mt, DCS crash at startup and a new folder appear...

I was going to say the same thing, shadows, both in the cockpit and in the world, are clearly visible and one of the things that give the most immersion and graphic quality to this simulator.

here it is, but remember, with Add-ons VREM effects works perfectly options.lua

Quest Pro, XR Quad View (mbuchia). Disabled "Generic depth" and "Effect runtime sync". Restart, no VR changes, I have red slider to maximum, the effect is seen in 2D, but not in VR. Debug activated, capture frame, and log attached. Thanks. ReShade.log

Activating reshade techniques and seleccting colormatrix for vrem effect only works in 2D mirror, in VR nothing change when moving sliders.

It works again, I just use the color effect in the cockpit; but sorry, I don't understand what you mean by "capacity to use both VREM features AND reshade effect in VR". On the other hand, would it be possible to use an effect like HDR only in the cockpit? Thanks

Is it necessary to put J preset in the base profile or can it be put only in the Digital Combat Simulator profile?

Is this latest version worth it if I only use DLAA?