jwflowersii

ED Team, A few questions on planned features for the Dynamic Campaign engine below. Will you be able to pick ATOs in the future and do flight planning for that ATO? Will the dynamic campaign be available for the Warbirds? Will the Mission Data Card feature work within the Dynamic Campaigns? Thanks!

Is ED aware that the Bf109 seems to be able to take a ton of hits and have no effect. Yet, I get shot a single time and the P-51D's engine is smoking. I mean I'm putting over 200 or more rounds into a guy at close range and he's good to go still.

I bought a module that is still not finished and they released another module after the one I purchased. It is reasonable to expect completion within a certain time while other aircraft that are newer get features we've been waiting for. That's just not good business ED.

Also, the TWS is a feature that has severe game impact as well in Multiplayer. Now we have AIM-54s and AIM120Cs that makes it very hard to compete. Sure we have SA, but it doesn't matter if you can't get close enough to fire a weapon.

NineLine, I appreciate the comment, however, how do you expect people who purchased a product two years ago to feel when features that have been missing get added to another product. It may make sense from an engineering standpoint to a degree, but for people waiting patiently it seems to leave a different message. I'm sure you can understand the frustration when many items are still left incomplete. I'm sorry, but two years is a long time for an early access standpoint. Appearances matter when making business decisions as well.

ED, I've been a loyal customer since the release of the A-10 module. I'm highly discouraged that a newly released product has received features we have been waiting patiently for on the Hornet for two years. Your team stated Hornet resources would not be diverted, however, this appears to not be the case. I don't see how the Track While Scan feature that we've been patiently waiting for has arrived on the Viper prior to a product released two years ago. It is not okay to divert development resources to another product while you have unfinished products with features missing originally planned on. This is a serious breach of customer trust and I sincerely hope you realize the trust you have lost. Early Access means you will finish the products features and prioritize those features prior to releasing other new content. Unfortunately, my greatest fears have been realized and my trust has been broken. I hope this is a one time occurence, but it really is poor form from ED.

I've streamed an example where I do not get a missile warning until I'm already in the break. You can see the missile starts tracking me at 16nm and 14nm right away. I had no EWR warning at all until right after I fire off my missile and start my break.

The 16's are firing off at 20nm and the missile is tracking right at me. No EWR or spike. Either they have LTWS now or something is bonked. I just fired a missile with LTWS in Hornet and the F14 turned right away.

I tried TWS Maddog on Hornet all the time, and they always immediately turn away. So something is not right on the Hornet or AIM120. ED needs to finish the Hornet before releasing multiple other modules. Its leaving a bad taste in my mouth.

In the recent update did they change the behavior of the AIM-120Cs. I've had multiple times now when a F16 fires off an AIM-120C missile I get no EWR warning until right before impact. It's not tracking anyone else. Either they have TWS implement now and the F18 doesn't, or something is broken. Can someone else confirm this finding?

Wags, Any chance of getting flight planning for multiplayer missions built into the system? I think this is a weakness for allowing multiple flights plan missions on multiplayer. John

I would like the ability to have custom kneeboards for a specific flight within a mission. Thanks

Is anyone else frustrated that the track replays never seem to work? I would love to be able to record movies and post them on YouTube for the world to see. Why doesn't ED respond to this issue? It seems the track of other aircraft doesn't have issues in multiplayer or single player, but the player aircraft never works properly. I don't see how TacView is able to replay all events just fine, but we can't get a working replay in game. Please fix ED.

DCS Team, I think this is a great idea and would require minimal effort. For anyone who objects to this idea, if you're offended by this you have some serious self esteem issues. We have skins to represents various countries, it isn't a stretch to add skins to represent various genders and races. BTW, it's not "social justice" in any way, and to make such an issue out of a simple request shows you're bias unfortunately. Please add as soon as possible.

I would love to see the ability to create multiplayer squadrons that people could join and keep track of statistics. It would be nice to have to ability to challenge other squadrons as well. Eventually, you could look into creating an eSport as well with live broadcasts of events.

When I'm flying the F-14, for some reason I can't see anything in the mirror or use external views. It works on all the other planes. Am I missing something?

Please, it's about time to spend some cycles on fixing the replay tracks. I have so many awesome moments in multiplayer and in single player, but I can never capture them because it fails to capture my flight. It's about time you spend some development time on fixing this issue. It's ridiculous and you might as well not have it in the game if it doesn't work properly.

I've seen some weird behavior when trying to trim. I've reduced power only to have the nose climb. Something is off, I'm just not sure what it is.

Do you have link to this new terrain engine you speak of? I haven't heard they were working on it. Thanks!

Actual ground deformations would be nice to have included. Any chance this could make it in?

Do you represent ED, and while I understand other features are important, I believe this is important as well for playing multiplayer. Also, why so hostile over a simple question?

Any plans for a data cartridge? Are there any plans for a data cartridge feature for the F/A-18C? Thanks, John

Curious it there are any plans to add some bump mapping or ground clutter for terrains in DCS World?

If they could combine this with the Nevada Maps and add Davis Monthan, Luke AFB, El Centro, Miramar, and Fallon I would pay $100 for it. F-16 training out of Luke, A-10C out of Davis Monthan. If they could add Lemoore, that would be heaven.

It would be nice to have a new terrain for San Diego, Miramar, North Island, San Clemente, and the Yuma training range.