Jump to content

Divide Et Impera

Members
  • Posts

    138
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Divide Et Impera

  1. This is Military obligations , we are in a game , the goal is to make different scenarios , not the only one who is made by true planes . So in this case , delete the russian boats , have you ever seen a10C attacking russian boats ? what are the MIG29 are here for ? etc . and for the fan-boy part , being a Fan-boy wich means love evrything from some entity even if its not that good , is not a good action philosophically speaking ..
  2. That's right , i've never seen any F16 , any ukrainian plane etc taxing in front of me . Have you played any scénario a bit more evolved than " shooting tanks shooting the other tank .. " ? But as always ED is perfect , whats the point of this forum so ? I'm not attacking ED , i attack the 99% of Fan-boys .. This is not a SO important thing but man stop beeing ED's pompom girl .. Without any agression , but with the passion of the debate
  3. This is a true answer . This is what a forum is made for , and i have absolutly no problem in giving money for hard work , but : i don't really feel lts différent to pay 60€ before or after the release . But anyways , it wouldn't be fun if evrybody was in the same mind :) and i'm confident that ED Will do the best . Thx for the reply btw , and have a Nice day
  4. I must admit that this was a bit provocative :) but its a fact that people from the ED team should just be less " you're wrong ". I'm just saying, wags, that i hope this map wouldn't be just another map with sand . Its Nice to get fully detailled 2cm rocks but its not the aim of this sim isn't it ? The thing about the 3D model is frustrating you have to admit : they are not at the same level as the whole sim : very high You know the reason why i care and worry about this : because i love this sim . And if you know i'm wrong , tell me why , i'll be the first being happy to go to bed smarter than before. BTW the next one , DCS : what ? ( kidding ;) )
  5. ? The goal of ED isn't supposed to make money = to make people want to buy their products ? Another thing wich ( without any agression ) is quite annoying is that when anyone say other things than " ED is fabulous " they got answer Like that . I'm not six years old , and i'm speaking about a moral and a reflexion point of view . Not a : if you're not happy ... Etc. I'm just saying that this map quite finished in the beta have been recuperated by ED to have the "DCS" label and attract people buying it . It would just be better to have something else ( Like those 3D models wich are for me a incomprehensive thing ) BUT if i have to be a bit abused by a monopol company when i buy something i prefer this company to be ED because this is business but they have without any doubt made a magnificient sim . I'm just not a sheep saying " fabulous " At evrything ED pops out . Even If i must admit that they made fabulous thing , but not all . But this is my opinion and you have totally the right to got yours as a part of the ED team .. :)
  6. Its not a price and money question , more a moral one . I can largely afford to pay , but i don't like to pay when the thing inside is not that good. but we'll see. i really pray though for the 3D models update ..
  7. I really don't understand ED sometimes and i hope i'm wrong : why making this map PAYWARE when the possibility of immersion in real combat really goes down when you're over las vegas instead of Irak/Afghanistan when there is a LOT of 3D planes models who seem to come from 1980's. At least , id prefer to see a new map with a 3D models improvement ... Please , why does the SAM systems and tanks got a better 3D model than quite a lot of planes ? There's a lot more prioritary things to do IMHO But at this stage , to be constructive , i think that to make people pay you should make those 3D models
  8. Pinky switch : Ctrl+P . And then click on the lights switch
  9. UFO's .. I want easterr egggs !! Or is this is an annoucement of DCS:UFO ? I hope it'll be possible to fly over FPS-friendly areas and feel like in Irak or Afghanistan :)
  10. Wouldn't be a Good idea to add a F16C option in the poll ?
  11. sorry if this has been asked before, but I was wondering if the nevada's terrain with its most sand evrywhere and rock based style would be less FPS-killer than the crimea/caucasus region with its lots of towns ?
  12. The prepare mission options ? Wharf is it located ? I've never heard about it
  13. Does The cbu bug which put cbu87 bomblets in cbu97 and makes very difficult to kill armour with anti personal bomb will be resolved ?
  14. Emergency flood light .. The one right the first one you press when making a startup
  15. Personnaly sand is sand , iraqian sand should look Like Nevada sand . I'll just imagine that i'm in Iraq its quite the same terrain in dry places . But thats true that a single airbase is ...
  16. Does the cbu bug ( anti armor sub munitions incorrectly replaced with anti personal ligot armor muni ) is résolvable before the next patch with any manipulation ?
  17. Because as you may know , dcs needs all my joystick buttons. And there is no Space left .. ( i dont have track IR yet )
  18. We hear them but why can't we see the little drops on the cockpit when ifs raining ? Like in FSX for exemple
  19. A company of heroes - style if you see what i mean . A ranking system would be a dream for me
  20. And we could still keep the two options available : on/off commands for TM warthog , and same but with axis for other users
  21. Mk-84 for only unarmored and light armour ? Its very effective against tanks and all heavy armour
×
×
  • Create New...