taps

What bombing mode do you use? I always use CCIP releasing the bombs in pairs to kill tanks. You have to hit them pretty close, at least the T-80. Take a look a this thread: http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=99688 it contains a lot of useful information for CCIP delivery. Unfortunately the link to the mentioned "battle book" has been removed, maybe if you ask this Eddie guy nicely he will still give it you.

It's kind of difficult to create a campaign with the P-51 and the AI FW-190 being the only WWII "things" in current DCS.

Your numbers are completely made up and no relevant basis for a discussion.

Mirage-F1 turned cabriolet: http://pics-aeronef.discutfree.com/t22p890-dassault-mirage-f1 :pilotfly:

Ok, no harm intended, I've deleted my posting.

...

In a recent incident in Afghanistan - according to media reports - taliban fighters successfully hid from A-10s overwatching the area and lured German KSK into an ambush. So the guys in the real world sometimes have problems finding targets as well.

Geht / und * auf dem Numpad nicht?

That's nice but with the Huey solution, non-FFB users can unchain the rudder from trim and still use central position trimmer mode.

Hi, I'm trying to figure out how to use the addStaticObject function. The documentation says that "The table has the same format static objects have in a mission file." but I don't understand what exactly that means. Here is my current non working sample code. The trigger message is shown but the container does not appear: static = { ["units"] = { [1] = { ["shape_name"] = "konteiner_red1", ["type"] = "Container red 1", ["unitId"] = 17, ["rate"] = 100, ["y"] = 682340, ["x"] = -85215.428571426, ["name"] = "Alpha", ["category"] = "Fortifications", ["heading"] = 0, }, -- end of [1] }, -- end of ["units"] } -- end of static trigger.action.outText("debug", 5) coalition.addStaticObject(0, static)

5zN02p1-Y8Y Another dogfight vs Fw-190D AI.

Did a short test, seems to work fine.

Denke, die F-18 ist interessanter als die F-15C, da trägergestützt und multirole.

The campaign is not a real combat campaign, more like a series of tutorials. Yeah, well, it doesn't :music_whistling:

Did you follow this procedure: http://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=1661223&postcount=2 ?

Nice flying. Why do you use only the fixed sight?

There is Flaming Cliffs for the mass market, but the P-51 is part of the "hardcore side" of DCS that means you will have to invest a lot of time to master it. Sure it's probably a good idea for ED to program a more customizable AI, but there are dozens of other in my opinion more important issues that require ED's attention too. Maybe people can dogfight online against other "non-hardcore" players, so they have a beatable opponent?

No, you just have to practice more. Sooner or later, you'll wish the AI wasn't so easy to beat :thumbup:

Works fine for me with the latest TS3 version. Do you use 64-bit TS3?

Played the mission tonight with three other guys. Big thanks for your work and the work of all involved people. The voice acting is superb and the way the pilots are guided through the mission is working flawlessly, we always knew what was expected of us. I can only recommend this mission :) Though we didn't need the tanker, I wonder how to find it. Can you add TACAN information for the tanker in the briefing?

Does still apply? So it doesn't really matter whether you fight average or expert AI?

I flew the A-10 for a long time without rudder pedals. I used the "throttle friction" slider on the TM Warthog throttle unit for the rudder while taxiing on the ground. I never use the rudder in the air with the A-10. I only recently bought rudder pedals for use with the P-51.

Maybe this way we can get all those "farming simulator" guys interested in DCS? ;)

No. Just lots of practice. :thumbup:

Ker, hier laufen se wieder rum... Was ist denn an Battlefield abwertend?