Jump to content

A.S

Members
  • Posts

    1914
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

Everything posted by A.S

  1. The Pheonix lights, that was not a tri-angle UFO...that were the Berkuts :lol:
  2. Geh zu simw.com .....ist nahe, liefern einwandfrei...verschiede Zahlungsarten...sind auf dem laufenden.....ich bin sehr zufrieden mit denen.
  3. 1. Thx so much. More details, without revealing to much? 2. Looking forward to test it ..but very happy to see something being done here 3. Looking forward to test it ..but very happy to see something being done here 4. Thx for considering this issue too. 5. ;) ..hmmmm Now you speak :smilewink:
  4. NEWS - 2nd optional TCL Mission for Lockon Guns Only read more: http://www.teamcombatleague.ca/forum/showthread.php?t=382 Both Teams start AIRBORNE at: 10kft at 330kts speed with 15nm head to head seperation to bandit(s) Available Aircraft each side: 2x Su-27 Fuelload 40% 2x F-15 Fuelload 52% 2x Mig-29s Fuelload 65% 2x Su-33 Fuelloat 30% It is ABSOLUTLY not allowed to change Fuel-settings. This will lead to immediate disqualifaction !!! In case of disputes the .track-files of your opponent(s) can be requested, or you can open your own .track-file with a Hex-editor to "read-out" the proper fuel-load(s) of your opponent(s) to control if they were according to ROEs or not. (Your own track will save the fuel-ammount as data of your opponent as "starting-condition") The ROEs (Rules) are the same as usual ..... http://www.teamcombatleague.ca/rules/ with ONE difference !! In Map2 .... LOOSER is who does not fly anymore WINNER is, who stays airborne (If both collide and one crashes few seconds before the other...cmon....thats a draw..."stays airborne" means intact and able to mantain a flight. If both flame out...well, the first - who hits the deck - lost :P ) ... have fun ..all of you..... :smilewink:
  5. This Stick is an old LeGend ......nice to see it after long time ..somehow
  6. memories :D
  7. Happy Birthday :yay:
  8. AWESOME ! :pirate::drink::gun_rifle:
  9. We proudly present the new Live-TV Stream application the homepage www.teamcombatleague.ca Purpose of this idea is to stream live aircombats/flights taking place and to run in other times loops of tracks, tapes and taciview. Of course not every match will be shown live, but you got the idea of good entertainment :smilewink: TV screen also includes a Live Chat Box, if spectators want to communicate or have a good laugh. :D (Test-stream today 20th Sept. 2009 3pm Servertime) * * * * * * * PS: additionally i would love to announce the new change in the "must upload recordings-rules" (all ladders). ACMI's or Tracks or Recordings need not be uploaded anymore unless there is a dispute, and the player filing the dispute must upload their ACMI's or Tracks or Recordings and after and only after it is reviewed and if it warrants it the Admin's will ask the opponent to upload their ACMI's for further review, failure to do so will be automatically considered a loss. This action will ensure both players record their matches, meaning that still every pilot HAS TO record the flights and save them. This change applies for FalconAF, Lockon FC and IL-2 Ladder !! Updates: Rules of Engagement (ROE) Falcon Allied Forces http://www.teamcombatleague.ca/forum...read.php?t=324 Rules of Engagement IL-2 http://www.teamcombatleague.ca/forum...read.php?t=347 Rules of Engagement Lockon FC http://www.teamcombatleague.ca/rules/
  10. Here i have another example to "inspire" minds... After some 20 years of tireless dedication to his in depth research on unification, Nassim Haramein’s most recent scientific paper, “The Schwarzschild Proton,” received an award at the University of Liège, Belgium during the 9th International Conference CASYS'09 (Computing Anticipatory Systems). Chosen by a panel of 11 peer reviewers, Haramein's paper won the prestigious "Best Paper Award" in the field of “Physics, Quantum Mechanics, Relativity, Field Theory, and Gravitation.” This significant paper marks a new paradigm in the world of quantum theory, as it describes the nuclei of an atom as a mini black hole, where protons are attracted to each other by gravitation rather than some mysterious undefined “strong force.” This radical new view of the quantum world produces a unification of the forces and appropriately predicts measured values for the nucleon of atoms. Think about the differneces between "KNOWLEDGE" and the safety it provides, but that sometimes the only safety you achieve is the one to end in a trap. VIDEO: http://video.google.de/videoplay?docid=4907540922643918266&ei=vmCkSrCMJJzE2wKn59TyBA&q=Crossing+the+Event+Horizon&hl=de&dur=3# btw. yoda if you see this..you might like it (fractal universe)
  11. Actually i enjoy that circus with GG here :D ....ok understood
  12. You know topol...what is more funey.... If you catch up on latest Theories, i mean the ones made by mainstream science, you will see things like Relativity-Theory, Quantum Mechanics, Particle and EM researches ( Large Hardon Colider so to speak), String and M-Theory....mathematical equations over equations to combine and to explain all those findings so they make sense, trying to combine their relations in order find the "world formula" etc etc....mathematical inventions of 11th dimension in order make the equations work out....and so far and so on.... you might ask yourself at one point, "holy crap...how deep and phantasized is all that?" Science surely has to specific points manifested proofs and standpoints, but beyond it becomes REALLY wild....really really wild....and somtimes, the answers may be simpler then thought. Therefore i dont laugh about Keshes work for example, i know he is a very weirdo guy - cmon his sayings are tooo good to be true - but yet i respect his approchings, because at the end of the day, they arent "wilder" then those of conventional science are. Whereas normal science is specifying paritcles, quarks etc etc etc. for example....he and even back in days Ed. L. say: all are just 2 poles or "forcefields" in very specific behaviour, and only their kind of interaction, position and relations defines matter, antimatter, electrons and so on.. oh yeah..and light and gravity of course.... I find this way of thinking VERY interesing (although i just described their thinking very very simplyfied here) i would love to see, modern science pulling that ideas through a mathematical test-model. (Btw, i made resarch on Keshe to be sure he is not just a nutcase...he has relyable backgrounds in science or registers) Einstein is a soo good example for that too.....who in world would have ever imagined the results of his work before ...everyone "normal" would have said its bolloks, magics, nonsense.....you know what i mean? Who are we, to say we know so much, just because someone, somewhere proofed something and we refer to it and only to it and everything beyond we dont dare to ask, and if someone does we lol about him?.... Thats sad.
  13. that trhows you off...doesnt it :lol:
  14. Seems like you are just bubbling words spontanius out of emotional state without clear following. I m not BELIEVING anything, all i did is quoting FACTS. If YOU believe it or not, well thats up to your intelligence in research. It is a very flat statement btw...but i would love to see the creative part, your CD tray motor ;)
  15. The Casmir effect is a measurable effect also based on it, but as far i know you cant measure the ZPE energy flow, conversion and fluctuations however you wanna name it. Thats is/was the big problem in first place. You can realize effects obviously with mysterious source or reason, but you cant directly spot it with known instruments. You really have to walk through all the links i provided...slowly and good, even some of them may appear "wierd" at first view...walk through them....make parallel own researches.....and sum up your owb picture. Sometimes you read about mystical devices...on other places you find more "relyable" documents assisting that mysterious device...etc etc........ I try to find some solid material on it...i mean really solid.....hard ..here and ther i pick somthing up...but the most funey part is...that Edward Leedskalnin's and Keshe´s works convinced me most with their absolutly differnt approach of electromagnetism and matter. Both are very dubios men in general, but their explanations are so overlaying and convincing in nature, that its hard to deny add: this is a very nice place to read on ... http://www.calphysics.org/index.html
  16. How funey is that :D its hard to extract a "direct" energy what you cant even measure...believe me..im on this for long time...just out of interest..and i really have some wierd ideas connecting all the dots i found till now.
  17. Because it did and does work. I gave you many links which show that, including a publication-.pdf and the attempt to combine ZPE with QM what was a big struggle in first place. All you have to do is ... search for accredited instutions .. their latest works in that field....and read up. You might not find a ZPE powered nose-hair shaver..but you will find enough to read.
  18. I dont know if you are refering to this case http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/1559579/Physicists-have-solved-mystery-of-levitation.html if so, yes i know it. What you just said is at the end, what i struggled from the very beginning ....part of this science business is to try to disprove stuff, including the existing model - this is an important part.... And yes, i attempted. Im not blond or someone who has some euphoria because he thinks he invented the wheel a 2nd time. Surely i follow those new things i presented VERY critical. What you think how much digg digg digg search search browse browse confirm i did, before i post such things.
  19. Interesting thoughts.... I have my own theories if it goes really beyond book science. I try to draw my own conclussion and same time i try to adapt in excistent known physics without violating it - too much. But thats the good part of phantasie, you can construct, destruct and progress. I like alternative ideas, wild approaches, yet not sci-fi, still on bases of physics. I remember someone comparing the fact that light may act as particle or as wave depending if you observe it or not (that alone is wilder then my own dreams lol) with smoke rings. Those you blow smoking cigarettes. They move through space as waves (or vortex) but yet they can bounce off of surfaces keeping shape and chaning direction as they would have been a particle in toto ...... Many interesting things are to come, and maybe it requires unguilty child-like playing, free of boundries to discover so much more in nature..... We all learnt that there is no such thing as perpetuum mobile, including me as long as i was teached anything in physics...but yet new days, new science discovers fully agreed on and official violations of some of those laws in particular cases and admits it......(video above. min 32:40 and also other publications)...perpetuum laws are violated, as we would cheat nature, but we dont, just showing there were just parts we haven´t understood before. That is what i was trying to say from the beginning of this post.
  20. Looks like your concisousness is refusing to learn....you get stuck in one miss-spelled line just to justify your ignorance...denying FULLY who that person is..and what he speaks about overall. That is ridicilous...am i arguing with kids here? geeez. Einstein cheated his wife, what hasnt made him unworthy in his deliverances :) Compared to him in terms of science you are "nothing" ... Speeking of speed: to shakle your believe-systems again of absolute knowledge and mighty stuff.....information, not signal, has been experimental and proofen transmitted over light-speed. In Germany and in Los Angeles. Get over it.... ;)
  21. If you refered to me...i must correct ...not mad...but "not normal" :smilewink:
  22. This one i must (or forget) to post... It is a little bit on higher levels of understanding but fair enough. http://video.google.de/videoplay?docid=-988496603742502119&ei=14OhSs-BEaCY2ALlzJzsBA&q=john+bedini&hl=de&dur=3#docid=-5738531568036565057 Background to his person: http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Thomas_Valone edit: for GG...listen to 32:50 minutes in that video.... and let me say this. There is Tom Valone saying this.... and you here saying whatever......what you think i and all others believe more? ;)
  23. Here is another very interesting case: "Left-Handed materials" First of all a quick read from physicsworld.com http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/7046 Let´s see what we find in Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metamaterial hmm intersting enough....quote: "defying physics..." f+++ the what? :huh: now lets see what accidently poped up in the news regarding energy applications with left-handed materials http://pesn.com/2009/09/04/9501564_Schwartz_ERR_Fluxgenerator/ tztztz...stuff out there :suspect:
  24. I have to add this link in order for proper re-production or research: http://www.cheniere.org/toc.html follow all links there... http://cseti.homesite.net/bearden.rm quick realplayer vid
  25. Sure i agree on that part.....it must be re-do-able....best from other persons indepentend...but in all cases that happened. I really have to research to pick on that one...i know from previous browsings..that many ohters hooked on those results and replicated same experiments. I keep broswing and collecting and digging....you can also if like...and we meet again...this post wont disappear anytime soon ..i guess :D
×
×
  • Create New...