BrzI

I actually extracted the view .luas from the mission and replaced them with the core DCS .luas and finally got the views I wanted. Looks like the baked in views were the culprit. Thanks

I can set the default Zoom for a mission (LAlt + Numpad0). But I want to set a default zoom factor for an aircraft so that it works any time I spawn in it. It seems like this issue has been present for a long time. Lots of posts but none of the suggestions work for me. I have played with the default view section in the main AND saved games section of the config/views folder. Tried various combinations along with chekcing-unchecking the enable user snap views option. Nothing works for me. I have to customize the default view and Zoom factor everytime I start a new mission. This used to work for many years but I stopped working quite a while ago... Is this a bug or if not - coudl somebody suggest what I could be doing wrong ? Thanks

It has been a while...so I am not sure any more what exactly I did. I ended up deleting the Su-30. The Su-35 is still installed. Created a few loadouts for the Su-33 - see attached file. With the R-77M and the RVV you pack a big punch now.. Su-33.lua

Just to say that I also lost my J-11 on top of the FC3 loop. It does not get recognised in the encylopedia (background only shows). If I insert it in a mission it will not spawn. Will wait for the fix. Don't want to have to go through setting up all the FC3 aircraft.

Where to I find the missile declaration script ? Thanks

It is interesting that I have been running base Windows 10 security without excluding the DCS folder until he last update. Anyway, I have excluded it but cannot see a loading time improvement. Probably because i am running it on a newer SSD. Thanks

nullGot this from my Windows security center after latest update. Any suggestions folks ?

Hi folks, is it possible to task AI to shoot down drones (eg. CHs Shaheed 136) and cruise missiles... ? Thanks

Yes , that will make things much simpler for end users... But, will you have access to their new versions before release ? Or will there be a time where we will need to wait for you to update your packages.. Just asking...I realize the amount of work you put into this and then provide it at no cost to us... much appreciated and thank you.

OK...so that means when the new stable version is released all the missile tracking issues will go away...the current beta will become the new stable and I will not upgrade your packages... Will wait for the next stable release before I chime back in... Cheerio

I did a full repair of current stable version of DCS...took a while Removed all add-ons except TacView and latest Russian asset pack ( CH Military Asset Pack Russia 1.1.0 ) Running MT version of DCS - same thing...the AntiShip missile flies to where the target was at point of launch.. CH - would it be possible to note the versions of the Open Beta and Current Stable that your packs are tested with ? Thanks Navy collisions2.miz

Not sure if this has been mentioned before. Core DCS antiship missiles track targeted ships fine. However, all CH antiship missiles from the Russia pack track the targeted ship position at launch. They do not adjust in flight for the target ship movement and always fall behind the targeted ship. Thanks

Figured it out. Used successfully on a Mig-29S and Su-33. If anybody is interested in doing this feel free to drop me a line.

Hi folks, this is a question for the mod makers.... I just downloaded the Codename Flanker Su-30. Unfortunately, in order for it to work, you have to remove the Su-35 mod. However, I would like to keep the Su-35's RVV-L and the R37M for use in the Su-30/33. Can somebody outline what files I would need to carry over/edit from the Su-35 folder in order to use these two weapon in the Su-33 ? Thanks a lot...

December 22 2023 Russian asset pack. Looks like with DCS 2.9 all 3M54T amd 3M55M antiship missiles aim for positions-at-launch of their assigned targets. They can no longer hit anything. Thanks Navy collisions2.miz

No...

Tried it but no go... HUD lines on Su-33/27 J-11 are still jaggy. DLSS does nothing. Only option is good old-fashioned MSAA. Pity that DCS will never give us full-fidelity Soviet/Russian aircraft Thanks though...

My NVIDIA control panel settings are ALL on default.

Did some experimenting: Running native monitor resolution 3440x1440. Turned upscaling off. Guess that makes the sharpening slider redundant ? MSAA x 4. Looks good. I am seeing what I was expecting to see. TAA.. Jaggies DLAA.. Jaggies Looks like all these new features give me no visual benefit at all. Curious to hear what Flappie and co. have to say. Thanks

Here you go...Thanks options.lua

I have updated to 2.9 MT and indeed - performance is much better. I have a minor question : When flying the SU-33/27 the HUD lines are more jagged than they were before. I pushed all AA settings all the way up but no joy. It almost feels like AA settings do not apply to the HUD and the situational display... What do you folks think ? Is this a bug ? Thanks

Here is my version of the same problem. SCUDs overshooting big time. Test_SCUD.miz

Thank you..

Just reporting the issue where missile trails become flickering black and carrier white lines also blacken - depending on view angle. If I use dynamic weather the clouds will also turn flickering black - depending on view angle. This seems to happen when a significant number of missile trails need to be displayed. Happens in both basic and MT version. No response needed. Hope this helps to improve graphics performance. Navy collisions.miz

Yes, it had it for years... Wish somebody would make it clear if this is going to return or not.