robert123456

Even if you look at it at a software/game perspective i get a lot more hours, fun, challenge from the dcs a10c than with lets say x favorite game. Both are great things but the a10 is still my choice and will be for a lot more time, besides it took me to learn the a10 the same ammount of hours that it would take to complete most more expensive games and i still get to enjoy as long as i wont and is always different. So i agree with most that the price is just right for what you get.

Really like it, but now you will start hearing (mainly from me) how can you have that beatifull model without AFM and clickable pit :music_whistling: Jokes aside really nice and hope that one small step towards dcs flanker :thumbup:

Back to square one then.

Finally!!!!! The mig 21 should be good enough to wait for this and this will be great to wait for the flanker. I hope you are doing whichever version has the more info that let you achieve greater fidelity, as everyone says DCS level or death :D. Lots of good luck with this proyect and keep us as updated as you can please. :thumbup:

looking very good, cant wait to see a start up test on that nice cockpit.

Interesting, at first it looks like it looses some depth and yes i felt a dizziness like effect at first. After watching a couple of times it looks like something that with some work an testing could make it even better.

If you like DIY stuff search for freetrack, download software, make clip and have something as good as track ir for a fraction of the cost. There is facetracknoir too but not as good as freetrack.

Yes and thanks for pointing it out. Also i think thats inevitable, but i can tell you its not the focus of my post, at least not here because this is not a forum for that. To put it differently, if we have more variety we can choose our aircraft and side more in tune with our preferences and we would have a better and more interesting experience, taking the role of different pilots on different platforms from different countries. like now there is BS, the huey, the gazelle project, its interesting. (personally Ill go now to my cave to wait for the mig 21) :)

I agree, as i posted when i got the a10, i love it, not because of the a10 but because of the quality. But with the current trend you have nothing to fly against that offers the same quality. So in multiplayer is a10 or a10 if you like an afm fixed wing, of course there is the p51 but they are not compatible and the su25 lacks the quality of the a10 module. I cant imagine how happy ill be with an aircraft i like and afm and everything, but that wont happen soon. I dont have anything against us aircraft, i do hope to have variety. Also what you say its true anything can change in the market, maybe wait till all get bored of having one side to choose in mp and then other offerings will come.

To put it simply i agree with what you say, moreover i would like to see more level of attention to military aviation without making the usaf the focus of everything. One has the ugly feeling that we are heading more towards "DCS: Us air force" with a couple of oponents here and there instead of an open combat simulator. We got black shark, but then a10, p51, now f15c, soon a u.s fast mover, 90% of 3rd party are us based aircraft..... I could be awfully wrong but thats why its a feeling and not a fact. Also i like dcs quality so i would really like to understand where are they heading but time will tell. And yes beczl is the most interesting offering so far

I have a10c only and after a short test really liked how it flys now, smoother. Whats the mini hud option for in misc? i checked it and saw nothing different

Thanks a lot cookie for that detailed answer. Ill see if i can grab that book somewhere because importing things here is a little complicated at the moment. Another question: The jtac asks me to attack a tank formation consisting of 4 tanks and use a maverick D, i only have 1 maverick and my wingman 2, so i strike 1, order the strike on the other two and then should contact the jtac again and tell him what to make him decide an ordinance for the fourth tank? Whats the term for that? you strike 3 tanks and then refuse command? Thanks.

I agree but that is true for me with most russian aircraft, they have more of a "soul" than western counterparts which makes them more enjoyable to fly. I would prefer that ed would release somehing else but would be great for a third party to go for it.

Thanks for the vids, ill watch them in detail later. I dont know why but every time i see a blueish russian cockpit makes me want to fly it. Beatifull vids about the su27, liked the bit i watched when explaining the hotas commands. And there goes another question, when someone will make a russian hotas :joystick:

I agree that as time passes more dev teams or even ed are going to build more. And that somebody is probably thinking of doing or already secretly developing one. Just seems odd the number of recent announcement none are for russian planes except the mig 21. I think if they can make a realistic enough f15e there wouldnt be a problem for the rest of the russian birds we are expecting. Of course i wouldnt expect a realistic t-50 but there are many old and beatiful examples to do. Didnt thought about the possible difficulty of making an AFM for these aircraft. That may be one of the reasons. From a marketing standpoint i could buy at least 10 copies of the next sukhoi or mig release if that helps :lol:

Im not complaining or anything, i really like the fact that lots of different aircraft are being modelled with fidelity. Its just seems that there are lots of us aircraft being announced, some european and very little russian which has many interesting and historically important airframes to be modeled. Currently there are (to say a few examples) f15, f104, f14, a4.... harrier, typhoon,.... and only the mig 21 as a dcs option of a russian fixed wing to come. I know that no announcement doesnt mean that someone isnt working on one or more, its just that they are the ones i would like to learn the most, with the su27 on top of the list, and see less and less attention to them. Ok thats all, just wondering if there are some russian birds on the horizon and if there is some reason behind the lack of development or announcements on them.

Thanks a lot for the fast and detailed replies. I will check all this info and replay the mission and see if i can use it to do a better and cleaner attack. Yes i like that when you think you know something a whole load of new info appears or someone starts shooting at you in ways you havent anticipated :D P.s. Kaiza that pdf was detailed and helpfull thanks.

So after a lot of trying i finally finished the first of the instant action missions in full sim mode!. On the last target (waypoint 6: column) you are asked to attack a group of tanks going through the road and you may contact the jtac playboy on x radio frequence. So i contact him and automatically send a message which says my bearing info and the current payload of me and my wingman. He then says something about the 9 line (i think he called it) and gave a set of info: 1,2,3 N/A 4 2600 feet msc 5 tank column road heading southwest 6 coordinates mm333623 7 marked by wp 8 friendlies south 3000 meters troops 9 egress east This is what i remember now so there might be one or two words missing somewhere but i think its pretty close to what he said. So my first question is what all these means in terms of information to engage the target, specifically i dont know what means numbers 4 and 6. What am i suppoused to do with the coordinates of 6, i imagine is the tanks location but how do i use it? Also what does it mean that 1,2,3 are N/A not available? I ended up completing this last part of the mission with a combination of patience, common sense and some swearing too but of course would like to understand and learn whats all that about. Thanks for any info.

That would be so much fun that would make anyone forget about fc3, Another option is that the webcams are used to make a reality show were we could put all the devs on a hercules that would crash if they stop working all at once. It would be called dcs: release or die!!!! :D

Thanks :thumbup: I didnt think i could get more excited about the mig 21 and then beczl comes up with that beatiful skin, maybe we could even start our own official mig 21 squad some day :beer:

Well ill have a look as well since im still in my diapers with the a10 :thumbup:

Yeah but when he said that cockpits are not clickable did he meant also the f15? i dont know if they confirmed or not that it will a clickable pit?

Thanks my silly brain skiped that thinking it was the runway number :ermm:

Hey i have two questions 1: during the landing training mission you select batumi runway, when selected on the right mfd i can see the radio frequency and ils number, then near the runway the instructor tells you to set the course on the hsi to 130. Where do you get this number? i.e. if im in a mission and land on another runway where do i get that number? 2: this one was a strange thing during the bomb training mission. When i was practicing with mk82 on ccip when i holded my weapon release button (without yet releasing a bomb) the plane suddenly started to turn left and i had to fight it a lot with the stick to the right. It continued that way until i applied some strong rudder on the opposite direction (right) and it corrected itself, then it did it again and corrected the same way. Was this a weather thing (wind or something else) or a navigation issue? Thanks.

Fairly new here too but not new to ed products. I too think its very nice to find so much and so inmediate support. Even the greatest software has problems but few of them has a good support team. So another big :thumbup: from me. Even better now that in the near future 1.2.1 is going to be neat you will have time to announce dcs: su27 :music_whistling: