exhausted

It's a buggy feature. Sometimes it turns on randomly and I find there is no keybind set for it yet. It's really lousy to have in a multiplayer fight.

While the body may be a trivial improvement for some, it has almost a certainty of breaking immersion for most. I can look at my own darn arms and legs, lol. No need to "ooh" and "ahhh" at the figure in the cockpit.

first person 3d models for the pilot's own body are a terrible idea, efforts of which should be refocused elsewhere. It is not just inconvenient but it breaks immersion.

Right, so why don't we have a common sense ME exemption seems to be the question.

I want to put a lot of space between the current Block 50 and a Cold War variant. I'm thinking of the 10 for its little bitty tail. LOL 15, I don't care... 1 I don't care... 5 I don't care. Any of them are good. But let's get this bird going. Excellent candidate for modders to built. It would be a staple like tthe A-4 or C-130!

Can we start to consider the F-16A Block 10 again? This is a huge distinction from the F-16C we have now. This would be closer to the F-5 than the modern F-16, in fact. It would be able to add a lot of 1970s capability to what we have in the F-5, without compromising the need for skill.

Good choice of scheme, USMC air for the win

Good point. Can they even fire the DEFA cannon? Maybe they can make the ammo there.

Yes, I'll have to do that. i am a little disppointed about not being able to use the R530 but that's just life. I guess it gives you a real apples to apples comparison between the F1 and the F-5.

These are my thoughts as well. I have heard of their use against a drug trafficking region near the Afghan border. But, I really don't know what ordnance they are dropping. My idea is to design 6-7 missions in a short campaign where the player is allowed either the F-5 or the F1. Their mission is to inflict casualties in a flareup of tensions in 2019 where the US launches a half-cocked invasion that is so poorly planned it gives the Iranians more of opportunities than anticipate to inflict casualties on the US. This is meant to reflect a possible choice that one of the American leaders appeared ready to use at a point in history, but was in all likelihood doomed to fail. After 6-7 missions, it is meant to wrap up with both sides claiming victory. It'll have intercept, escort and strike missions.

Shouldn't this be a default option for carrier missions?

It is my understanding Harriers, especially on the boat, use bombs with fire retardant coatings on them. I don't like seeing my bombs look like they are from Air Force stockpiles. Can we change the color schemes for most JDAM and dumb bombs? The GBU-12 already has it.

Yea, I've seen Iraq with some cool loadouts but I have not seen Iran with much of anything except as you said fuel tanks

Did Iran ever obtain the French missiles?

I feel like people give too much credence on sounds recorded with lousy mics

What weapons have the Iranians had available for their F1s? I am designing some missions where the player flies the Mirage F1 for Iran in an off-the-rails adventure based on the off-the-rails events of 2018-2019 between the US and Iran.

Hey yall, I get the concept and the math is for those want to deal with the theory and the numbers. @VZ_342 this is the solution I have been using, but I would like to know if the F-5's gauges can be adjusted for magnetic variation at the start of a mission, so you don't have to keep doing mental math on the fly.

What's the correct way to do this, by the book? What do pilots irl actually do? What do pilots in game actually do?

Do the F-13!!!!

Thank you! Love the trailer.

The rule should be simple: If it's been mounted on a Su- or MiG- in Ukraine, then it should be included. Period.

What if it's already available? We are not talking about providing them with anything, we are talking about the use of regulated materials by someone who may not be exposed to US jurisdiction, like a game developer in Europe.

Could you explain that? It is my understanding that ITAR is an export restriction, not an issue for the importer. That is to say, if you receive it from the US then it's the exporter's problem and not yours. Also, what about data? Does ITAR prohibit the export of unclassified nontangible information?

Looking forward to new manual after they destroyed the key binds

Thank you very much for this guide. I waited like a year before I touched the Mirage F1, so I could get your take on how to do everything. Now that I've flown it, I can say that it is much like a MiG-21 on steroids. Thanks again for this guide, as it is making DCS very fun for me!