exhausted

I don't think Robin Olds flew the F-4E, but rather the F-4C and D

Well, the Harrier was MOSTLY finished but the promised Plus is never getting released. The MiG-19S is never getting released. I called it, and this is why I am not holding out for Heatblur to make a carrier capable Phantom II, either. These types of problems are so apparent from the heavy handed moderation and deletion of posts.

Could it mean both of them are in the wrong, and what's the remedy for a disparaging remark? I would assume you have to prove damages to recover or would have to invoke whatever mechanism is in the contract, if there is one, that would allow them to break the contract. Other than that, I would think they pretty much would need to work it out, in which case I couldn't fault one side for getting things moving.

"Non-disparagement and confidentiality provisions" if in existence, would lead me to believe that the claim Razbam is making is more likely to be true. If a party breaches a contract, a promise in that contract has been broken, so if Razbam breached second by giving information that looks bad to ED, then maybe it's not the breach.

Fixed price that fails to respond to market forces does not do justice to the people who worked so hard to create a module that will fade away from low sales. Dealmaking and negotiating is part of the territory, and if you want to make sales then you must do your part. To the silly notion that offering a lower price to newer customers is unfair to older customers: what makes this so different from everything else? There is nothing at all unfair about making price adjustments.

As well as the naval ops that occurred during OEF, another interesting point is that Afghanistan actually claims that coastline, which makes for an interesting scenario! Even though it was sort of acknowledged by an Afghan leader during the Soviet involvement, recognition has since been recanted and led to skirmishes and threats from Afghanistan to Iran and Pakistan over the coastline. I could see this scenario getting very interesting! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Durand_Line

I was actually inviting you to tell us your vision of how we are to use the Afghanistan map -- we can decide whether doing circuits and flying campaigns where we drop 1-2 bombs sounds like fun, but I wanted to know what Afghanistan is supposed to bring to the series, other than terrain alone. There are potential scenarios that bring in multiple powers, should the terrain be expanded into Iran or the Arabian Sea. I really hope my posts don't continue to be deleted just for asking a challenging question. I wish to participate in the discussion and these are all pertinent points. In Afghanistan, CAS was often focused on tiny groups of 1-15 insurgents holding up a larger group. One of the early tactics was to fly over the suspected area and not drop any ordinance. Anaconda involved large groups of Al Qaeda and maybe Taliban infantry and vehicles, but it would make sense to include part of Pakistan for such a scenario related to the earlier parts of OEF. Funny story is VMA-513 out of Yuma obliterated a Pakistani border checkpoint when a USSF group was fired upon while chasing AQ out of a village.

I'd take an RF-4 module before an F-4E. The missions are pretty interesting, from the RF-4B to the RF-4EJ. Lots of cool stuff out there.

The F-4E would be more interesting if they added these sorts of capabilities. I'm really holding out for a J or an S though.

OK Devs, did you forget about this or perhaps still don't know about it?

You have to choose the complete loadout from the loadout menu. You can't choose it individually.

Hello, I think there should be smoke rockets available for the LAU-68 and the the LAU-10 pods. These are referenced in Hammer from Above: Marine Air Combat Over Iraq. Will you add them to the DCS Hornet so we can use these?

Aerges could decide on that and they should

I cannot get the Shahed to fire by using attack group, attack unit or fire at point. Does anyone know how to get them to work?

Does this happen with updates?

Does this break integrity check?

I approve of the unification into a single version.

Hey I'd be interested

I'll be sure to take care of myself and get yearly checkups until then

You guys expect way too much if you are counting on a thin air promise that 'it's being planned'. If you want vaporware, all you have to do is look around.

There's tons of MiG-21F overlap with the F-4E, but actually more so with F-4B, C and D. The bis is sort of a choice without a home, unless you would still want to go ahead and place the bis in the same arena as F-15s and the like. If you want to dogfight in the most likely of times and places, then the MiG-21F is your best choice. Then there's all the J-7 and F-7 variants, many of which but not most are nearly identical to the MiG-21F. The PF and PFM are okay, but have too many compromises for a sole focus in DCS - but if we are being aspirational, then a spread including the -F-13, -PF, and -PFM are what we need to cover the most active times where the MiG performed its intended role. To me, I'm not looking forward to placing the bis on the Afghanistan map, and the Afg map seems like a total fool's errand for the series; bomb huts in an Su-25 or do unending orbits in an A-10. No thanks. PS the MF is an awesome beast, and would have been a better choice than the bis.

private

Noirth Korea deployed to Egypt to fly MiG-21s, which I'm thinking included -Fs.

The F-13 had a great T/W ratio and a lower wing loading. The bis is a bloated pig, in comparison. As has been said, the F-13 has plenty of company when considering its very long service life and integration into F-7 models. It's the one version of the MiG-21 you literally can't miss with.

Good for the Marianas map.