Ghostraider

I could draw but i have no original dimensions

Hey Deadman check the link: http://aerotronicsllc.com/docs/rudders.pdf

But there is some big problem ! The interfacing to connect the panels. I think jetpilot use the best interfacing solution via can bus system. You connect to control Box and four exits for the can busses, there are "plug and play" use one or all panel. Wich interface solution would you like to offer ? Or is it a problem who to resolve by the user ? My favorite was an complete construction Kit, but the interfacing to connect 25 panels and more is not easy i think. Best Regards Ghostraider

Hello Guys i think there are many ways to selling parts & panels: 1. Blank Panel with or without backlight 2. Panel with switches, without wiring 3. Panel with switches & wiring 4. Panel complete with all parts to build like a constuctiobn Kit 5. or completely funkrional panel For an affordable cnc look here: https://www.stepcraft-systems.com/

O.K Deadman I see its your passion to do this. Thanks for the patience about my Question and... How to get the plans or Part from you, or do have a contact person in the EU ? Because when i buy Parts in the USA the half or fom the Price is shipping, custom duties and tax that a b......t. But good work and quality cost P.S. Taste a good beer from Germany and you feel better ( or not )

Hallo hatte ich auch schon Antivir ist da relativ " snsibel " lass mal einen anderen Virenscanner darüber laufen ob er auch ne meldung schmeißt. Ansonsten musst du mal im englische forum unter Site issue schauen da ist dieses Thema auch schon behandelt worden. Beim herunteladen kannst du mit einem Programm auch die Checksumme prüfen lassen. Dann weißt du auch ob die Datei i.O. ist oder nicht. http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=137041

Ich zähle im Tiefflug nicht die Blätter an den Bäumen

OK DM why will you do the hard work allone ? When youre wife say ready for pre contact you spend too much time for your Hobby ( joke) Not every Person have the knowledge or the ability to make drawings or electronic or what you ever need for cockpitbuilding. Thats the reason to talk about here in this forum and find everybody who can help. The second reason ist to save money when you can create these part for yourself. Or you have the money then buy the parts by Jetpilot or others.

Did everyone have the original dimensons from the a10-c cockpit/consol/Panels i would like to make an ACAD drawing about this, maybe in mm for the European Rebuilder

Ist halt wie immer wenn sich Politik einmischt, entweder wird es teuer, es geht schief, am Bedarf vorbei oder alles in kombination.

Versucht es doch einmal mit der Maus

Na ich nehme mal an das DCS einfach zu viele "Baustellen" aufgemacht hat. Die schon vorhandenen Module die noch gering verbuged sind bzw. wo auch noch arbeit anfällt. dann dei ganzen Third Party developer und schließlich dei eigenen Entwicklungen wie die Maps. Meine Meinung: erst die vorhandenen Module "zu Ende" entwickeln und dann das nächste Anfangen. Bei zu vielen "Baustellen" und zu wenig Leuten bleibt halt mal was auf der Strecke. Andererseits ist es die Comunity die nicht warten kann bzw. zu viel implementieren wollen gleichzeitig muss das ganze noch "Spielbar" sein, mit anderen Worten die Eierlegende Wollmilch Sau. Ich finde ED hat schon eine verdammt Gute Simulation auf die Beine gestellt, klar nervt es mit den Ankündigungen die nicht eingehalten werde ( falche Informationspolitik) aber ich warte lieber etwas länger und habe ein " Vernünftiges" Modul" als irgend ne Beta Variante die alle zwei Tage irgendwelch Updates braucht dann ist ein Bug gefixt, hat man zwei neue, das nervt ebenfalls. Also ED lasst euch lieber Zeit macht keine voreiligen Versprechungen, kündigt ein Modul an wenn es fertig ist, Informiert uns über den Stand der Dinge. In diesem Sinne, Danke für die bis jetzt geleistete hervorragende Arbeit und Gutes gelingen für die weiteren.

Here are a supplier in Germany: http://www.alders.de also available in english In USA: http://www.ottoexcellence.com http://www.nkkswitches.com/aboutUs.aspx

Hi all, here a link wich could be helpful: http://www.alders.de/Steuergriffe/OTTO-Controls-Griffe-fuer-Luftfahrt-und-Militaerische-Applikationen::622.html?language=de http://www.nkkswitches.com/aboutUs.aspx http://www.ottoexcellence.com/

Sorry about this, not everybody is programming expert like you ! my question, is it possible to connect your Panels or others to a can bus system like sim parts or whatever or do you think its to complicate. When you have an other forum who can talk about this, tell me. THX for sharing your hard work, answers...... It could be easier when we have this in a german forum

Hi All, IAN great Stuff ! Any CAN BUS system works: http://www.simparts.de/ How did they do that ? You need one controller and then you can connect every panel you want. A friend buildt a cockpit with these parts: http://www.a10-homecockpit.de/alle-alben/!/oa/6603752/ It have many benefits. 1. one USB/Ethernet connect to PC, other panels are plug and Play, reduced cabeling...... What i want is to start a disscussion, if it possible or not that the comunity to develop an equal system.

Antivir found someone, Avast dosnt found someone i think it was an fals positiv THX for help !!!

Checksum IS O.K.

O.K. I have to download with the Downthemall with MD5 the same problem rise up.

How can i test it ?

For Information I Download the UH1 modul from FTP3 Germany today and the ANTI Virus say infect by, HTTP the same TR/Crypt.ULPM.GEN

Hi all ? Im not a programming expert but perhaps it can be realised. When use a cuple moduls it could be better to use a can-bus system because you have one Interface to communicate with the PC ( Ethernet / USB) the other traffic between the modules works via can-bus http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CAN_bus the MC are used for the modules are: 18F45K80

OK it moves THX

Where is the cortex Thread or oversight everything

The late Cold War preference for compact antennas and S-band operation has been supplanted by a preference for designs operating in the L-band and VHF-band. Of the six recent Russian acquisition radar designs, only one may operate in the S-band, the remainder being beyond any question L-band or VHF-band designs. The preference for lower bands is intended to defeat stealth shaping and coatings optimised for S-band and X-band threats, but also electronic warfare self protection systems most of which cannot jam below the S-band due to antenna size limitations Look here: http://www.ausairpower.net/APA-2009-02.html