FlyNate

why nothing like tars in dcs ? Or they could make it work through existing teamspeak...

why nothing like tars in dcs ? No one changes every 30 secs lol, you might change once or twice per flight. Some of us are building scale pits and want the radios to work. Otherwise why build them. This is something that needs to be done. When flying online with many people. One channel becomes crowded and it's very sloppy. Don't say you are happy there's no TARS because there won't ever be any hope of added radio realism, just don't use it, lol. Use the EASY COMMUNICATION option... You'll get better as time goes by and you practice. There are those of us that want the added realism, and we aren't overwhelmed, yet ;)

How do I use it? DCS Huey isn't on the 'Add Interface' list...

Exactly.

In fact, why doesn't ED just integrate TARS into DCS. They could make it work with DCS from the core and maybe make it more stable. We should have had an accurate comms feature from the start, or at the very least added by now.

Lmao! Personally, I prefer bags of concrete, lmao!

True. I would be happy with just the weapons change. I don't use the forward minis much because it doesn't look good. That's just me though. I really would love to have the guns moved back and have no front station at all. Is anyone working on it?

Yes, yes... But they didn't :( DCS is long overdue. We need in-game comms that are properly simulated. If TARS can do it, then it shouldn't bee too hard at all. Why have they not done this yet?

F-4 Phantom Who Wants it Poll Yeah, I myself am 100% NOT interested in the A-7 lol. Not when I have the A-10C

Because not all of us can afford it.

The Huey weapons systems - are they wrong? Same here, but the twin 60s sure looks badass lol. Check this out guys... Why did we not get this option? I want this, but not on the forward mounts. I too want just the rear mounts with everything installed on them. BST should just make a UH-1B lol.

I've flown falcon for years. Most of the falcon players I talk to want to come to DCS, but not until they have a 16. The ones that don't, didn't know about DCS, and when they find out, they want it too. Falcon is old. They Falcon players want to fly with other aircraft types and enjoy all the advantages of DCS that Falcon doesn't offer. Please give us a Block 50/52.

F-4G!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I WANT!!!!!!!!!!!! PLEEEEEASE!!!!!!!!!!!!

THAT DID IT!!!! Thanks guys! I love 1.2.8 btw. SLINGLOADS BABY!!! and my A-10C Countermeasures finally work, lol.

yes. let me get rid of it and see what happens...

Someone please tell me whats up with this, lol. How do I make the entire thing look like the right? Anyone else have this problem?

I agree. Hands down. Viper Cg/Cj

I finally grabbed 1.2.8 and set it up this evening. I made an AIR AMERICA mission using the new Huey Sling-loading feature, and it sparked a new idea... AIRDROP CARGO :music_whistling:

Sounds like a good time to me... BRING IT!!! :joystick:

Even though I want the F-16C, F-4G, and/or F-111D more than any other, I could get on board with the F/A-18D. The GBU-16 drops no different than the GBU-12 or GBU-10, but Carrier Ops, SEAD missions (IronHand), Recon, Intercept, and Night-Time Bombing all sounds pretty great. Not to mention the chance to develope the first "Shared-Cockpit" fighter aircraft. They could make the back seat just as detailed and functional as the front seat and we could have some serious fun online, and that would also open up the possibility of a 2-seat tandem Home Sim Pit... I WANT!!!

I agree about the flyable aircraft, but not the WT comparison. We need to have what's already there flyable, not a list of projects that aren't already in the game. An F-16C, F-4E or G, a Tornado IDS, these are things that would sell to so many people. Everyone says "we don't need a Viper, Falcon has that covered" but actually we do need it, and more. Those guys, myself included, would love an accurate, fresh Viper sim, among others aircraft already used by the AI. BMS is great, but I feel the sim is outdated. We could have many more players if we had more multirole fighters flyable, simply the ones that are already in the game. That would make DCS more popular in the sim world. More customers would make the change to DCS. And ED makes more money. I hate that there are already lists of new subjects being developed, when the best selling subjects are already in the game. When I first got into DCS, I assumed that they would make the stuff they already have in game and eventually we would have all of the DCSW aircraft flyable in A-10C detail. I hope this is the plan.

I know the F-4G might not be 100% accurate with the period! but it would work for 70s, 80s, and 90s missions. They did have Gs in the SE Asia paint job so I think that would work. And what tha hell, might as well throw on the F-111D while they're at it lol.

That's the one of three things I want more than a Viper... F-4E or G. Preferably a G, an A-1H Skyraider, an AH-1G Cobra, and an O-2A Skymaster These would be great along side the Huey. Oh, and a Nam map. :thumbup:

There's your reason right there... I fly Falcon BMS, but DCS is newer, and it would be great for all of us to be able to fly together. The Viper would sell great. Many air forces use it, and if they simply released an F-16C, most of the Falcon guys would want to check it out and rig their sims for DCS. BMS is great, but DCS needs the F-16C. I'm amazed they haven't done it yet. I am almost done with my A-10C pit, and I really want to do an F-16C next, but I'm firmly waiting on a Viper for DCS to begin work on it. I don't want to use BMS to run it. I have fought BMS for some time now, but my DCS works great. It would definitely make the Nevada map more fun if we had a Viper. The whole Red Flag idea sounds so much more fun with the Viper in the equation...Aggressor.... And not FC3 F-15C either. A full-fidelity Viper. Not sure who said it, but a few posts ago, someone said that ED should just make the AI aircraft one at a time first. I agree. Why add more when they could update each AI fighter to full-fidelity like the A-10C? That would make more sense. I wish they were all flyable in the same detail as the Hog. And I'm sure I'm not the only one. If we could have all the fighters flyable in detail, I would be satisfied with just that. Cockpits could be built for any plane in the game. I hope the Viper isn't just wishful thinking. Most of the people I talk to want the Viper as bad as I do. Only one way to find out, and that's to wait...

That sucks. We need a multirole fighter. The F/A-18C will be neat but I want the F-16C the most right now. More mission possibilities, so many countries use it... Not to mention the availability of sim pit parts. The falcon guys have already done the work.