Boberro

I hope so ^^^^^ I am at the front of the PC change, don't know if whole or just GPU yet. Anyway my minimum level is 8 GB VRAM - now have 1 so it is PITA.

I think it is better to take 8 GB GPU if someone is going to upgrade PC in this year. Of course nVidia.

OK I know the truth is painful, so I limit it to Su-25 only. I do not care where I do say bad things about very old plane. I fly it well enough to see how "useful" it can be in modern battlefield. Like Russian trolls troll over and over moan about mighty Russian missiles. In such case you trolls shouldn't give voice in other topics. I replayed track. You were killed after destroying bridge. Of course Su-25 wouldn't know where missiles and other threats come from in multiplayer missions made by other people. It is hard to prove anything in flying own mission or have in memory where units are. In reality there is no such info, especially nobody knows precision location of mobile MANPADS. Do not try to convince that 40 year old Lada car is almost or as effective as newer/more advanced because you will never succeed.

I haven't declared anti-anything. So far in reality facts say whenever Western equipment showed there Soviet ones were wasted. Great example is Israelis wars. I am not trolling, I have right to say my opinion and I do it, whether Russian fanboyz like it or not. At least I do not live in phantasmagoria of mighty Russian hardware nobody's seen.:megalol: I test mission later though. It is the best to play not self made mission, I presume?

110

What about people with glasses?

Why couldn't you bear? There was problem with your head, sickness or FPS looked a bit crappy in DK2?

Yeah but imagine Doom 3 (old game but very passionate), Half-Life, Crysis 3 ect.... lovely :D Well, when did TiR was priced for $200? Anyway, 200 dollars is not 600 dollars, or worse 750 EURO in stupid Europe where everything must be so expensive.

If you mean effective against threats with even minimum AD around, then yes. I do not see how this middle age plane could achieve goals in such conditions - before, not after everything else has been cleaned by other planes and choppers. Maneuverability is not key to success. It is electronic, avionics. This is why Russian planes are good mostly for airshows, instead of real battlefield. Su-25T compared to vanilla Su-25 is top-tech. The problem is it is under development since when? 2001? It was the same idea with Ka-50 and Ka-29 (or Ka-52) as tactical commander leading the group. It failed as they now prefer to manufacture full Ka-52 units, fully individual, functional without help of 3rd hand.

What a horrendous price. I expected it to be around 350-400 euro. In this case I calmly wait for HTC Vive, as it seems to be even nicer...

Su-25SM has some nice things (like IIRC threat detector suite), but since 10-20 years I hear about SM there is no TV display. No TV, night, IR pod. Still when we take account possibility to precisely attack target (and identify it before) old 25T is better than SM. SM is just cheap modernization which would not ruin tiny RU military budget which takes ages to complete. Vanilla Su-25 is retarded nowadays, yes it can kill and can be effective - against some kind of village only.

Cmon, what is difference between vanilla Su-25, a brick and II World War plane :D This plane is good for attacking some "poor" insurgents who are not protected by some AA defense around. Drop few dumb bombs and run away. That's all like in II war plane I could achieve - except speed and harder airframe. 25T brick is a different story... at least it has possibility to find target via TV further than 2 km....

Yup, Arma model seems to be really simple and cost effective...

What can you attack sitting in this useless brick? :D

I do think real view is better, what I mean: - video resolution, encoding ect - we do not know original resolution - we do not know scaling - it is easier to put even ugly image on bigger screen and spot something than otherwise Example Ka-50's Shkval is really old, poor system but CRT TV seems to be not so small. To have real view of pilot we would have to get real resolution of the displays, resolution of the "TV pod" and MFD\TV screen physical size.

Yeah I think that too. Will test it :D To stop more derailing your thread I will just say it is sad you make change in the shader file you have to restart whole game. It takes long time even on powerful PC.

I've seen more files. Example laser beam, radar ect. We do not see laser beam and radar cone emitted by source (plane, chopper). Perhaps they are just made transparent... It would be nice to see how radars browse sky in the game. Just for tests :P I beginning to like that.

Does this "color render calls" have anything to the MFD shader file in Bazar\shaders folder? I ask 'cause I've modified shaders and now have color TV in Su-25T. It is also possible to put 32 inch TV inside :D

Yes, you seem to be right. I deleted Ka-50 folder and it gave me error with fc_3protect.dll I hope Su-25T is supported (later)? I removed FC3 as well, this time got other error: kernelbase.dll Nazwa aplikacji powodującej błąd: DCS.exe, wersja: 1.5.2.48726, sygnatura czasowa: 0x567c2fef Nazwa modułu powodującego błąd: KERNELBASE.dll, wersja: 6.1.7601.18869, sygnatura czasowa: 0x556366fd Kod wyjątku: 0xc0020001 Przesunięcie błędu: 0x000000000000b3dd Identyfikator procesu powodującego błąd: 0x19f8 Godzina uruchomienia aplikacji powodującej błąd: 0x01d1465cbc6b11a5 Ścieżka aplikacji powodującej błąd: D:\GRY\DCS_World_NEW\bin\DCS.exe Ścieżka modułu powodującego błąd: C:\Windows\system32\KERNELBASE.dll Identyfikator raportu: 0027bb98-b250-11e5-9bc1-f46d04e5aa3a

Yeah I glanced and here it is (System event log, applications): Nazwa aplikacji powodującej błąd: DCS.exe, wersja: 1.5.2.48726, sygnatura czasowa: 0x567c2fef Nazwa modułu powodującego błąd: ka50_protect.dll, wersja: 5.91.1512.10, sygnatura czasowa: 0x567c2fca Kod wyjątku: 0x40000015 Przesunięcie błędu: 0x000000000002f96e Identyfikator procesu powodującego błąd: 0x1964 Godzina uruchomienia aplikacji powodującej błąd: 0x01d1465946c91de7 Ścieżka aplikacji powodującej błąd: D:\GRY\DCS_World_NEW\bin\DCS.exe Ścieżka modułu powodującego błąd: D:\GRY\DCS_World_NEW\Mods\aircraft\Ka-50\bin\ka50_protect.dll Identyfikator raportu: a7801cd9-b24c-11e5-9bc1-f46d04e5aa3a Seems something with Ka-50 protection? StarForce?

Thx it helped but then is error with DCS itself. App detects DCS.... DCS runs but after few seconds there is error: Seems hoek :P --------------------------- Microsoft Visual C++ Runtime Library --------------------------- Runtime Error! Program: D:\GRY\DCS_World_NEW\bin\DCS.exe This application has requested the Runtime to terminate it in an unusual way. Please contact the application's support team for more information. --------------------------- OK --------------------------- If I don't run UltraMFCD there is no error.

I have such error at startup app: --------------------------- --------------------------- System.Windows.Markup.XamlParseException: The invocation of the constructor on type '_G23u50oRns0cgMPklePfjRz1I1e_' that matches the specified binding constraints threw an exception. ---> System.MissingMethodException: Method not found: '!!0[] System.Array.Empty()'. at _G23u50oRns0cgMPklePfjRz1I1e_..ctor() --- End of inner exception stack trace --- at System.Windows.Markup.WpfXamlLoader.Load(XamlReader xamlReader, IXamlObjectWriterFactory writerFactory, Boolean skipJournaledProperties, Object rootObject, XamlObjectWriterSettings settings, Uri baseUri) at System.Windows.Markup.WpfXamlLoader.LoadBaml(XamlReader xamlReader, Boolean skipJournaledProperties, Object rootObject, XamlAccessLevel accessLevel, Uri baseUri) at System.Windows.Markup.XamlReader.LoadBaml(Stream stream, ParserContext parserContext, Object parent, Boolean closeStream) at System.Windows.Application.LoadBamlStreamWithSyncInfo(Stream stream, ParserContext pc) at System.Windows.Application.LoadComponent(Uri resourceLocator, Boolean bSkipJournaledProperties) at System.Windows.Application.DoStartup() at System.Windows.Application.<.ctor>b__1(Object unused) at System.Windows.Threading.ExceptionWrapper.InternalRealCall(Delegate callback, Object args, Int32 numArgs) at MS.Internal.Threading.ExceptionFilterHelper.TryCatchWhen(Object source, Delegate method, Object args, Int32 numArgs, Delegate catchHandler) at System.Windows.Threading.DispatcherOperation.InvokeImpl() at System.Threading.ExecutionContext.RunInternal(ExecutionContext executionContext, ContextCallback callback, Object state, Boolean preserveSyncCtx) at System.Threading.ExecutionContext.Run(ExecutionContext executionContext, ContextCallback callback, Object state, Boolean preserveSyncCtx) at System.Threading.ExecutionContext.Run(ExecutionContext executionContext, ContextCallback callback, Object state) at System.Windows.Threading.DispatcherOperation.Invoke() at System.Windows.Threading.Dispatcher.ProcessQueue() at System.Windows.Threading.Dispatcher.WndProcHook(IntPtr hwnd, Int32 msg, IntPtr wParam, IntPtr lParam, Boolean& handled) at MS.Win32.HwndWrapper.WndProc(IntPtr hwnd, Int32 msg, IntPtr wParam, IntPtr lParam, Boolean& handled) at MS.Win32.HwndSubclass.DispatcherCallbackOperation(Object o) at System.Windows.Threading.ExceptionWrapper.InternalRealCall(Delegate callback, Object args, Int32 numArgs) at MS.Internal.Threading.ExceptionFilterHelper.TryCatchWhen(Object source, Delegate method, Object args, Int32 numArgs, Delegate catchHandler) at System.Windows.Threading.Dispatcher.LegacyInvokeImpl(DispatcherPriority priority, TimeSpan timeout, Delegate method, Object args, Int32 numArgs) at MS.Win32.HwndSubclass.SubclassWndProc(IntPtr hwnd, Int32 msg, IntPtr wParam, IntPtr lParam) at MS.Win32.UnsafeNativeMethods.DispatchMessage(MSG& msg) at System.Windows.Threading.Dispatcher.PushFrameImpl(DispatcherFrame frame) at System.Windows.Application.RunInternal(Window window) at _keeKUSFYs1GQ0lpUwd5aqr33f2E_._ulS6rtMa7Hmq4WBtgT7BQk5aSnZ_() --------------------------- OK ---------------------------

Yes and no. I guided it, stopped, reacquired. I kept radar on the target, no problem. But when I watched missile on F6 I've seen how it went stupid to the left for 1-2 seconds, then suddenly returned to guide on target. Twice happened during its flight. I guess enemy chaff worked and made ER to fly this weird path. I do not it was supposed to be like that. Green line is theoretical path to the target, black line is real path chosen by missile. Arrows shows missile position, how it turned left\right like. Difference in paths between green and black line is market as orange degree symbol.

I noticed better ER behavior but something else is crashing me. I am flying 1600 km\h at 12000 meters, happily looking for some n00b to kill. Found one. Happily locked and fired. Sadly watched how the missile loses precious energy. Missile went almost to 5000 km\h but then lost energy and went dead. When I saw how the missile tried to fight thin air at 12000 alt and how much energy, time has passed till it stabilized I got nervous. Additionally no lofting make flying at very high alt almost useless, except speed factor of the missile - but it loses it quickly so...

And that is sad. People are now used to get "beta" and wait for updates long time. It became "normal" which clearly is not. I do not deny the right to release beta product but which is close to function properly and short after release make it full product. Even now long time after release 80% modules are in beta status - I just browsed ED's shop. And people have orgasm about that :) What a weird "argument". People didn't complain just for complain to kill time. They had good points, the form of saying it could be better though.